Political Theory within and without Political Science

被引:0
作者
Feldman, Nathan H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Dept Polit Sci, New York, NY 10027 USA
关键词
AMERICAN; HISTORY; SCHOOL; ARENDT; HANNAH; LIBERALISM; REVOLUTION; DECLINE; QUEST;
D O I
10.1017/S153759272400269X
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
A schism between political theory and the broader discipline frequently shapes political science. How, when, and why did this occur? Deploying new archival evidence, I show how a cadre of leading political theorists between the 1940s and 1970s identified their vocation with humanism, presenting it as eternally opposed to the practices of "positivists" and "methodists." To tell this story, I focus on key figures, Leo Strauss and Sheldon Wolin, and critical institutions-the Conference for the Study of Political Thought and the journal Political Theory-to recount how political theory went its own way and the consequences of it doing so.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 201 条
  • [11] [Anonymous], 1968, C STUD POL THOUGHT C
  • [12] ARENDT H, 1971, SOC RES, V38, P417
  • [13] THE MODERN CONCEPT OF HISTORY
    ARENDT, H
    [J]. REVIEW OF POLITICS, 1958, 20 (04) : 570 - 590
  • [14] Arendt H., 1970, VIOLENCE
  • [15] Arrow K.J., 1951, Social choice and individual values
  • [16] Baer Michael A., 1991, Political Science in America: Oral Histories of a Discipline, P107
  • [17] Baer Michael A., 1991, Political Science in America: Oral Histories of a Discipline, P121
  • [18] Ball T., 1995, REAPPRAISING POLITIC
  • [19] Political Theory and Political Science Can This Marriage Be Saved?
    Ball, Terence
    [J]. THEORIA, 2007, 54 (113): : 1 - +
  • [20] Ball Terence., 1995, Political Science in History, P41