Results of Lisfranc Injuries Treated With Interosseous Suture Button Fixation With a Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up

被引:0
作者
Saito, Guilherme Honda [1 ]
Nishikawa, Danilo Ryuko Candido [2 ]
de Oliveira Jr, Adilson Sanches [3 ]
Fairbanks, Paula Jardim [3 ]
Mendes, Alberto Abussamra Moreira [1 ]
Prado, Marcelo Pires [3 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Sirio Libanes, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[2] Hosp Servidor Publ Municipal, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[3] Hosp Israelita Albert Einstein, Ave Albert Einstein, BR-05652900 Sao Paulo, Brazil
关键词
Lisfranc; suture button; forefoot; FRACTURE-DISLOCATIONS; INTERNAL-FIXATION; SCREW FIXATION; DEVICE; REDUCTION; OUTCOMES; REPAIR;
D O I
10.1177/10711007251322166
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Open reduction and internal fixation or primary arthrodesis are considered gold standards for treating Lisfranc injuries. However, several drawbacks are associated with these procedures, such as joint motion loss and potential cartilage damage. More recently, the suture button emerged as an alternative treatment for ligamentous Lisfranc injuries, which can be used either alone or in combination with traditional techniques, with the potential to mitigate some of these potential disadvantages. The primary outcome of the present study was to evaluate the functional outcomes of 20 patients treated with the suture button technique for Lisfranc injuries over a medium- to long-term follow-up period. The secondary outcome was to assess and describe the complications associated with this procedure.Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on 20 patients who underwent operation for acute Lisfranc injuries using the interosseous suture button technique between 2013 and 2019. The mean follow-up was 83 months (range 60-126). Clinical evaluation involved the assessment of complications, reoperations, visual analog scale (VAS) scores, American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) midfoot scores, patient satisfaction, and ability to return to previous activities. Radiographic analysis was performed aiming to evaluate reduction maintenance and osteoarthritis development.Results: Patients demonstrated excellent outcomes with an average VAS of 0.50 and a mean AOFAS midfoot score of 95.5. Incomplete reduction was the only factor we identified influencing lower VAS and AOFAS scores. Most complications were minor and solved with conservative treatment. More serious complications, such as loss of reduction and posttraumatic arthritis were observed in 2 patients each.Conclusion: In this small series with a relatively long follow-up, we found that the use of an interosseous suture button technique was a reliable method to treat acute Lisfranc injuries, resulting in satisfactory clinical and functional outcomes. However, outcomes including posttraumatic arthritis and loss of reduction raise remain of concern.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] Abbasian M.R., Paradies F., Weber M., Krause F., Temporary internal fixation for ligamentous and osseous Lisfranc injuries, Foot Ankle Int, 36, 8, pp. 976-983, (2015)
  • [2] Ahmed S., Bolt B., McBryde A., Comparison of standard screw fixation versus suture button fixation in Lisfranc ligament injuries, Foot Ankle Int, 31, 10, pp. 892-896, (2010)
  • [3] Brin Y.S., Nyska M., Kish B., Lisfranc injury repair with the TightRope™ device: a short-term case series, Foot Ankle Int, 31, 7, pp. 624-627, (2010)
  • [4] Cardenas C., McIver N.D., Nelson J., Et al., The use of knotless suture tape construct vs screw fixation for Lisfranc injuries: a cadaveric biomechanical study, Foot Ankle Int, 45, 8, pp. 896-904, (2024)
  • [5] Charlton T., Boe C., Thordarson D.B., Suture button fixation treatment of chronic Lisfranc injury in professional dancers and high-level athletes, J Dance Med Sci, 19, 4, pp. 135-139, (2015)
  • [6] Cho J., Kim J., Min T.H., Et al., Suture button vs conventional screw fixation for isolated Lisfranc ligament injuries, Foot Ankle Int, 42, 5, pp. 598-608, (2021)
  • [7] Chun D.I., Kim J., Min T.H., Et al., Fixation of isolated Lisfranc ligament injury with the TightRope™: a technical report, Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 107, 6, (2021)
  • [8] Coetzee J.C., Ly T.V., Treatment of primarily ligamentous Lisfranc joint injuries: primary arthrodesis compared with open reduction and internal fixation, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 89, pp. 122-127, (2007)
  • [9] Cottom J.M., Graney C.T., Sisovsky C., Treatment of Lisfranc injuries using interosseous suture button: a retrospective review of 84 cases with a minimum 3-year follow-up, J Foot Ankle Surg, 59, 6, pp. 1139-1143, (2020)
  • [10] Cottom J.M., Hyer C.F., Berlet G.C., Treatment of Lisfranc fracture dislocations with an interosseous suture button technique: a review of 3 cases, J Foot Ankle Surg, 47, 3, pp. 250-258, (2008)