Supply chain vertical common ownership and cost of loans

被引:5
作者
Tian, Haowen [1 ]
Wang, Junkai [2 ]
Wu, Sirui [2 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Polytech Univ, Sch Management, Xian, Peoples R China
[2] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Management, Xian, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Vertical common ownership; Supply chain; Hold-up; Cost of loans; CROSS-OWNERSHIP; CUSTOMER CONCENTRATION; CORPORATE SUPPLIERS; EARNINGS MANAGEMENT; DEBT; WORLD; RISK; EXTERNALITIES; DETERMINANTS; COMPETITION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2024.102677
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This study explores how vertical common ownership reduces supply chain risk and influences creditors' decisions, focusing on the cost of loans. Findings reveal that creditors view such firms as less likely to default, evidenced by lower loan spreads. This effect is stronger for suppliers with more relationship-specific investments, weaker bargaining power, higher information asymmetry, and long-term common institutional ownership. Results remain robust through quasi-natural experiments from financial institutions' M&As, supplier-customer pair analyses, etc. We also compare vertical common ownership with the horizontal one and demonstrate its incremental contributions. Moreover, the fraction of customer sales and the institutional investors' share ownership likely influence the likelihood of vertical common ownership, with our results consistently holding under Heckman analysis. Overall, the results suggest that vertical common ownership enhances coordination and monitoring, reducing risks and creditor risk premiums. The findings may offer valuable insights into managing supply chain risks and understanding their financial implications.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]   FINANCIAL RATIOS, DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS AND PREDICTION OF CORPORATE BANKRUPTCY [J].
ALTMAN, EI .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1968, 23 (04) :589-609
[2]   Does trust matter for the cost of bank loans? [J].
Alvarez-Botas, Celia ;
Gonzalez, Victor M. .
JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2021, 66
[3]  
Anton M., 2021, Innovation: The bright side of common ownership? Working Paper
[4]   Passive investors, not passive owners [J].
Appel, Ian R. ;
Gormley, Todd A. ;
Keim, Donald B. .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2016, 121 (01) :111-141
[5]   Electoral goals and center-state transfers: A theoretical model and empirical evidence from India [J].
Arulampalam, Wiji ;
Dasgupta, Sugato ;
Dhillon, Amrita ;
Dutta, Bhaskar .
JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2009, 88 (01) :103-119
[6]   Anticompetitive Effects of Common Ownership [J].
Azar, Jose ;
Schmalz, Martin C. ;
Tecu, Isabel .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2018, 73 (04) :1513-1565
[7]   The Total Cost of Corporate Borrowing in the Loan Market: Don't Ignore the Fees [J].
Berg, Tobias ;
Saunders, Anthony ;
Steffen, Sascha .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2016, 71 (03) :1357-1392
[8]   The effect of institutional ownership on firm transparency and information production [J].
Boone, Audra L. ;
White, Joshua T. .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2015, 117 (03) :508-533
[9]   The effects of institutional investor objectives on firm valuation and governance [J].
Borochin, Paul ;
Yang, Jie .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2017, 126 (01) :171-199
[10]   Institutional cross-ownership and corporate strategy: The case of mergers and acquisitions [J].
Brooks, Chris ;
Chen, Zhong ;
Zeng, Yeqin .
JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2018, 48 :187-216