Comparing an Advanced Monofocal With a Non-diffractive Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens Using a Mini-Monovision Approach

被引:1
作者
Zeilinger, Johannes [1 ]
Kronschlaeger, Martin [1 ]
Schlatter, Andreas [1 ]
Georgiev, Stefan [1 ]
Ruiss, Manuel [1 ]
Pilwachs, Caroline [1 ]
Findl, Oliver [1 ]
机构
[1] Hanusch Hosp, Karl Landsteiner Inst, Vienna Inst Res Ocular Surg VIROS, Vienna, Austria
关键词
CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; VISUAL-ACUITY; VISION; IMPLANTATION; RANGE; DOMINANCE; SURGERY; QUALITY; SIZE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajo.2024.10.014
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
center dot PURPOSE: To compare interindividual differences in visual performance of an advanced monofocal with a non- diffractive extended depth of focus intraocular lens (IOL) using a mini-monovision approach. center dot DESIGN: Single-center, randomized, controlled, double- masked study. center dot METHODS: In total, 48 patients (96 eyes) with bilateral age-related cataract were enrolled. One group received an advanced monofocal IOL RAO200E (RayOne EMV; Rayner) and the other group a non-diffractive extended depth of focus IOL DFT015 (Acrysof IQ Vivity; Alcon) in both eyes. Target refraction for both groups was mini-monovision. After 3 months, monocular and binocular distance corrected and uncorrected distance (CDVA/UDVA), intermediate (DCIVA/UIVA), and near visual acuity (DCNVA/UNVA); contrast sensitivity; binocular defocus curves; halometry; and Quality of Vision questionnaire scores were compared. center dot RESULTS: Binocular mean CDVA, DCIVA at 66 cm, and DCNVA at 40 cm were-0.10 +/- 0.10, 0.15 +/- 0.11, and 0.32 +/- 0.16 logMAR for the RAO200E and- 0.10 +/- 0.10, 0.12 +/- 0.10, and 0.27 +/- 0.16 logMAR for the DFT015, respectively, with no significant difference. A significant difference could be shown for the dominant eye in monocular DCIVA and DCNVA and for the dominant and nondominant eye in monocular UNVA, with 0.28 +/- 0.14, 0.48 +/- 0.22, 0.46 +/- 0.21, and 0.41 +/- 0.20 log- MAR for the RAO200E and 0.14 +/- 0.10 ( P = .023), 0.35 +/- 0.16 ( P = .008), 0.30 +/- 0.14 ( P = .001), and 0.21 +/- 0.10 ( P = .003) logMAR for the DFT015, respectively. Significantly smaller halo size in the RAO200E group and significantly better distance-corrected defocus curve at-2.5 ( P = .031),-2.0 ( P = .03), and-1 diopters ( P = .03) of defocus in the DFT015 group could be shown. center dot CONCLUSIONS: Distance corrected or uncorrected binocular visual acuity for far, intermediate, and near distance between the advanced monofocal IOL RAO200E and the non-diffractive extended depth of focus IOL DFT015, when compared in a mini-monovision setting, showed no significant differences. (Am J Ophthalmol 2025;271: 86-95. (c) 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc- nd/4.0/))
引用
收藏
页码:86 / 95
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Visual performance and photic disturbances with diffractive and nondiffractive EDOF intraocular lenses using mini-monovision: randomized trial [J].
Fernandes, Marcelo Caram ;
Nunomura, Carlos Yuji ;
Messias, Andre .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2024, 50 (02) :153-159
[32]   Design of double-zone aspheric diffractive intraocular lens with extended depth of focus [J].
Bian, Yayan ;
Liu, Yongji ;
Jiang, Lai .
CHINESE OPTICS LETTERS, 2018, 16 (09)
[33]   Clinical outcomes of a monofocal intraocular lens with enhanced intermediate function compared with an extended depth-of-focus intraocular lens [J].
Lee, Jae Hyuck ;
Moon, Su Young ;
Chung, Ho Seok ;
Park, So Young ;
Lee, Hun ;
Kim, Jae Yong ;
Tchah, Hungwon .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2022, 48 (01) :61-66
[34]   Difference in Quality of Vision Outcome among Extended Depth of Focus, Bifocal, and Monofocal Intraocular Lens Implantation [J].
Chao, Chen-Cheng ;
Lin, Hung-Yuan ;
Lee, Chia-Yi ;
Mai, Elsa Lin-Chin ;
Lian, Ie-Bin ;
Chang, Chao-Kai .
HEALTHCARE, 2022, 10 (06)
[35]   Visual Outcomes Following Non-Diffractive Extended-Depth-of-Focus Intraocular Lens Implantation in Patients with Epiretinal Membrane in One Eye and Bilateral Cataracts [J].
Sararols, Laura ;
Guarro, Merce ;
Vazquez, Meritxell ;
Ruiz, Sergi ;
Lopez, Elena ;
Biarnes, Marc .
BIOMEDICINES, 2024, 12 (11)
[36]   European, Multicenter, Prospective, Non-comparative Clinical Evaluation of an Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens [J].
Auffarth, Gerd U. ;
Moraru, Ozana ;
Munteanu, Mihnea ;
Tognetto, Daniele ;
Bordin, Paolo ;
Belucci, Roberto ;
Khoramnia, Ramin ;
Son, Hyeck-Soo .
JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2020, 36 (07) :426-+
[37]   Through-Focus Optical Bench Performance of Extended Depth-of-Focus and Bifocal Intraocular Lenses Compared to a Monofocal Lens [J].
Yoo, Young-Sik ;
Whang, Woong-Joo ;
Byun, Yong-Soo ;
Piao, Jun Jie ;
Kim, Dae Yu ;
Joo, Choun-Ki ;
Yoon, Geunyoung .
JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2018, 34 (04) :236-+
[38]   Comparative Outcomes of the Next-Generation Extended Depth-of-Focus Intraocular Lens and Enhanced Monofocal Intraocular Lens in Cataract Surgery [J].
Kim, Do Young ;
Park, Ella Seo Yeon ;
Park, Hyunjin ;
Kim, Bo Yi ;
Jun, Ikhyun ;
Seo, Kyoung Yul ;
Elsheikh, Ahmed ;
Kim, Tae-im .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2025, 14 (14)
[39]   Clinical Outcomes of a Non-Diffractive Extended Depth-of-Focus IOL in Eyes with Mild Glaucoma [J].
Ferguson, Tanner J. ;
Wilson, Caroline W. ;
Shafer, Brian M. ;
Berdahl, John P. ;
Terveen, Daniel C. .
CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2023, 17 :861-868
[40]   Comparison of dynamic defocus curve on cataract patients implanting extended depth of focus and monofocal intraocular lens [J].
Wu, Tingyi ;
Wang, Yuexin ;
Yu, Jiazhi ;
Ren, Xiaotong ;
Li, Yuanting ;
Qiu, Weiqiang ;
Li, Xuemin .
EYE AND VISION, 2023, 10 (01)