Motivation Strategies for Learning and Their Influences in Students' Feedback Literacy During Undergraduate Medical School: An Explanatory Sequential Mixed Methods Study

被引:0
作者
Cordovani, Ligia [1 ]
Jack, Susan M. [2 ]
Wong, Anne [1 ]
Monteiro, Sandra [3 ]
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Dept Anesthesia, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[2] McMaster Univ, Sch Nursing, Dept Hlth Res Methods Evidence & Impact, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[3] McMaster Univ, Dept Med, Hamilton, ON, Canada
关键词
Feedback; Feedback literacy; Undergraduate medical education; Learning strategies; Learning motivation; PAUSE; 2; LEARN; IMPLICIT THEORIES; SELF-REGULATION; SAMPLE-SIZE; EDUCATION; PERCEPTIONS; EXPERIENCES;
D O I
10.1007/s40670-025-02310-1
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Feedback from educators to students is considered an important and essential element of effective learning in medical education. Feedback literacy is the process in which a student receives, comprehends, accepts, and makes use of feedback. Factors affecting medical students' feedback literacy include students' characteristics, motivation, abilities in self-assessment, emotional reactions to feedback, and maturity. To generate a deeper understanding of this phenomenon, a sequential explanatory mixed methods study was conducted to measure students' motivational orientations and explore their strategies towards learning, how these orientations and strategies are related to students' feedback literacy, and how this relationship changes as students progress through a Canadian medical school. In the first quantitative phase, the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) was administered to first- and last-year medical students at a Canadian university to measure their motivational orientations for learning and learning strategies. Using the quantitative results (N = 58) to develop a sampling strategy for the second phase, individuals with different motivational orientations and learning strategies were identified based on their questionnaires' scores. This purposeful sample (N = 15) was then invited to participate in the second explanatory phase of this study, where a qualitative description approach was applied. We conducted semi-structured interviews with students, divided into two groups: those who through the measurement of 4.62 or below by the MSLQ were identified as having a low motivational orientation for learning (n = 4), and those who through the measurement of 5.34 or above by the MSLQ were identified as having a high motivational orientation for learning (n = 3). Participants' views were explored and synthesized, with the intent for these findings to further explain how medical students' learning motivations and strategies might influence feedback literacy. The integration of findings showed that five factors could be taken into consideration when improving students' feedback literacy skills: learning goal orientation, self-regulation, help seeking, personality traits, and learning experience. Based on those factors, we identified some approaches that could allow the students to enhance their own feedback literacy. Feedback literacy could empower students to have more control over the feedback process and help them to overcome the barriers they still face during the feedback process.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] Watling C.J., Ginsburg S., Assessment, feedback and the alchemy of learning, Med Educ, 53, 1, pp. 76-85, (2019)
  • [2] Urquhart L.M., Rees C.E., Ker J.S., Making sense of feedback experiences: a multi-school study of medical students’ narratives, Med Educ, 48, 2, pp. 189-203, (2014)
  • [3] Wisniewski B., Zierer K., Hattie J., The power of feedback revisited: a meta-analysis of educational feedback research, Front Psychol, 10, January, pp. 1-14, (2020)
  • [4] Bing-You R., Hayes V., Varaklis K., Trowbridge R., Kemp H., McKelvy D., Feedback for learners in medical education: what is known?, A scoping review Acad Med, 92, 9, pp. 1346-1354, (2017)
  • [5] Carless D., Boud D., The development of student feedback literacy: enabling uptake of feedback, Assess Eval High Educ, 43, 8, pp. 1315-1325, (2018)
  • [6] Archer J.C., State of the science in health professional education: effective feedback, Med Educ, 44, 1, pp. 101-108, (2010)
  • [7] Bing-You R., Varaklis K., Hayes V., Trowbridge R., Kemp H., McKelvy D., The feedback tango: an integrative review and analysis of the content of the teacher learner feedback exchange, Acad Med, 93, 4, pp. 657-662, (2018)
  • [8] Kluger A.N., Denisi A., The effects of feedback interventions on performance: a historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory, Psychol Bull, 9, 2, pp. 254-284, (1996)
  • [9] Watling C.J., Ajjawi R., Bearman M., Approaching culture in medical education: three perspectives, Med Educ, 54, 4, pp. 289-295, (2020)
  • [10] Ramani S., Konings K.D., Ginsburg S., van der Vleuten C.P.M., Meaningful feedback through a sociocultural lens, Med Teach, 41, 12, pp. 1342-1352, (2019)