Bone anchored maxillary protraction - a case report

被引:0
作者
Tabellion, Maike [1 ]
Lisson, Joerg Alexander [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Klinikum Homburg Saar, Klin Kieferorthopadie, Homburg, Germany
来源
INFORMATIONEN AUS ORTHODONTIE UND KIEFERORTHOPAEDIE | 2025年 / 57卷 / 01期
关键词
Maxill & auml; re Retrognathie; mandibul & auml; re Prognathie; re Protraktion; Bollard-Platten; Maxillary retrognathia; Mandibular prognathia; Maxillary protraction; Bone anchors; 3-DIMENSIONAL ASSESSMENT; FACE MASK; TRACTION; THERAPY; FORCE;
D O I
10.1055/a-2344-3518
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background Class III malocclusion is the result of maxillary retrognathia and/or mandibular prognathia. Orthodontists have different, age-dependent treatment options for class III anomalies. Treatment by means of Delaire-type facemask is an option, if the class III anomaly is diagnosed and treated early in age. Later treatment, previous to pubertal growth spurt, needs bone anchorage. Bone anchors are useful in patients, whose facemask therapy had not been successful or to avoid or decrease the amount of later orthognatic surgery, particularly if the patients have been too old for treatment with facemask. Case Presentation An eleven-year-old female patient with class III malocclusion with reversed overjet and deviation of the mandible to the left side was treated with bone anchors (Bollard-type plates) and elastics. After the overjet was corrected, the bone anchors were used during the following treatment with fixed braces for changing the position of particular teeth. Conclusions In this case report, bone anchors for skeletal anchorage were useful during treatment of the class III malocclusion. There was no need for orthognathic surgery during the course of the treatment. Despite some possible complications (loosening of the bone anchors, granulated tissue, unfavorable outcome during growth), the use of bone anchors and elastics for stimulation maxillary growth is effective in patients with class III malocclusion.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 46
页数:10
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
Alexander AEZ, 2009, AM J ORTHOD DENTOFAC, V135, DOI 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.06.025
[2]   Treatment and posttreatment craniofacial changes after vapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy [J].
Baccetti, T ;
Franchi, L ;
McNamara, JA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2000, 118 (04) :404-413
[3]  
Bhatia SN., 1993, MANUAL FACIAL GROWTH
[4]   Comparison of two protocols for maxillary protraction: bone anchors versus face mask with rapid maxillary expansion [J].
Cevidanes, Lucia ;
Baccetti, Tiziano ;
Franchi, Lorenzo ;
McNamara, James A., Jr. ;
De Clerck, Hugo .
ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2010, 80 (05) :799-806
[5]  
Chong YH, 1996, ANGLE ORTHOD, V66, P351
[6]   Treatment effect of bone-anchored maxillary protraction in growing patients compared to controls: a systematic review with meta-analysis [J].
Comelis, Marie A. ;
Tepedino, Michele ;
Riis, Neel de Vos ;
Niu, Xiaowen ;
Cattaneo, Paolo M. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2021, 43 (01) :51-68
[7]   Patients' and orthodontists' perceptions of miniplates used for temporary skeletal anchorage: A prospective study [J].
Cornelis, Marie A. ;
Scheffler, Nicole R. ;
Nyssen-Behets, Catherine ;
De Clerck, Hugo J. ;
Tulloch, J. F. Camilla .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2008, 133 (01) :18-24
[8]   EXTRA-ORAL TRACTION AND CLASS-III TREATMENT [J].
COZZANI, G .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1981, 80 (06) :638-650
[9]   Success rate of miniplate anchorage for bone anchored maxillary protraction [J].
De Clerck, Eline E. B. ;
Swennen, Gwen R. J. .
ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2011, 81 (06) :1010-1013
[10]   Three-dimensional assessment of mandibular and glenoid fossa changes after bone-anchored Class III intermaxillary traction [J].
De Clerck, Hugo ;
Tung Nguyen ;
de Paula, Leonardo Koerich ;
Cevidanes, Lucia .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2012, 142 (01) :25-31