On the application of multi-criteria decision-making methods in environmental pollution management: a comprehensive systematic review

被引:0
作者
Safarzadeh, Soroush [1 ]
Jafari, Hamed [2 ]
机构
[1] Quchan Univ Technol, Fac Engn Sci, Dept Ind Engn, Quchan, Iran
[2] Isfahan Univ Technol, Golpayegan Coll Engn, Ind Engn Grp, Golpayegan 8771767498, Iran
关键词
Environmental pollution management; Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM); Applications; Case study; Systematic review; Future directions; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; HIERARCHY PROCESS AHP; SITE SELECTION; WASTE MANAGEMENT; SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT; PERFORMANCE EVALUATION; PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION; MODEL; DESIGN; MCDM;
D O I
10.1007/s10668-025-06041-6
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The negative effects of environmental pollution, which threaten ecosystems, animals, and human health, have become more pronounced in recent years. Immediate action is required due to the devastating impacts of pollution on the air, water, and land. By realizing the scope of the problem and pursuing sustainable solutions through decision-making methods, these negative effects pave the path for a cleaner, healthier earth that can be decreased for future generations. This review of the literature looks at the collection of previous studies to investigate the connection between environmental pollution and Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) identifying major trends, approaches, and problems. All the publications have been indexed in the "Web of Science" database from 2000 to 2024 in the field. The present research gap, obtained by case study investigation, is analyzed to clear the future directions and trends of the field in detail using a comprehensive systematic review. The findings reveal that air pollutants such as carbon dioxide have been addressed more than the other pollutant types since 2013. Moreover, the application of "Fuzzy theory" and "Grey theory" appears to be more common in discussing uncertainty compared to others. Also, MCDM techniques can be complemented with other decision support tools, such as Life cycle assessment (LCA), risk assessment, and cost-benefit analysis to enhance the robustness of decision-making. Finally, this study facilitates decision-making procedures on pollution management using the introduction of the most appropriate countries' cases by industry and pollution type to provide sustainable and ideal solutions.
引用
收藏
页数:48
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Multi-criteria decision making methods: Application in the aviation industry
    Dozic, Slavica
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AIR TRANSPORT MANAGEMENT, 2019, 79
  • [42] Life cycle assessment and multi-criteria decision-making for sustainable building parts: criteria, methods, and application
    Theilig, Kathrin
    Lourenco, Bruna
    Reitberger, Roland
    Lang, Werner
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2024, 29 (11) : 1965 - 1991
  • [43] A Systematic Review of the Applications of Multi-Criteria Decision Aid Methods (1977-2022)
    Basilio, Marcio Pereira
    Pereira, Valdecy
    Costa, Helder Gomes
    Santos, Marcos
    Ghosh, Amartya
    [J]. ELECTRONICS, 2022, 11 (11)
  • [44] Application of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making in Land Evaluation of Agricultural Land Use
    Jozi, Seyed Ali
    Ebadzadeh, Farkhondeh
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE INDIAN SOCIETY OF REMOTE SENSING, 2014, 42 (02) : 363 - 371
  • [45] Review fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making in construction management using a network approach
    Chen, Long
    Pan, Wei
    [J]. APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2021, 102
  • [46] Review of multi-criteria decision-making for sustainable decentralized hybrid energy systems
    Das, Sayan
    Dutta, Risav
    De, Souvanik
    De, Sudipta
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2024, 202
  • [47] Examining the Research Performance of Universities with Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods
    Maral, Muammer
    [J]. SAGE OPEN, 2024, 14 (04):
  • [48] Simultaneous Evaluation of Criteria and Alternatives (SECA) for Multi-Criteria Decision-Making
    Keshavarz-Ghorabaee, Mehdi
    Amiri, Maghsoud
    Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras
    Turskis, Zenonas
    Antucheviciene, Jurgita
    [J]. INFORMATICA, 2018, 29 (02) : 265 - 280
  • [49] Comparison of the applicability of computer supported multi-criteria decision-making methods
    Cancer, V
    [J]. SOR 05 Proceedings, 2005, : 317 - 322
  • [50] Comparative analysis of three categories of multi-criteria decision-making methods
    Li, Yingfang
    He, Xingxing
    Martinez, Luis
    Zhang, Jiafeng
    Wang, Danchen
    Liu, Xueqin Amy
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2024, 238