Prognostic Role of Specific KRAS Mutations Detected in Aspiration and Liquid Biopsies from Patients with Pancreatic Cancer

被引:0
|
作者
Halkova, Tereza [1 ,2 ]
Bunganic, Bohus [3 ,4 ]
Traboulsi, Eva [5 ]
Minarik, Marek [6 ]
Zavoral, Miroslav [3 ,4 ]
Benesova, Lucie [1 ]
机构
[1] Genomac Res Inst, Ctr Appl Genom Solid Tumors CEGES, Drnovska 1112-60, Prague 16100, Czech Republic
[2] Charles Univ Prague, Dept Biochem, Fac Sci, Hlavova 8-2030, Prague 128 00, Czech Republic
[3] Charles Univ Prague, Fac Med 1, Dept Med, Vojenske Nemocnice 1200, Prague 16902, Czech Republic
[4] Mil Univ Hosp, U Vojenske Nemocnice 1200, Prague 16902, Czech Republic
[5] Mil Univ Hosp Prague, Dept Pathol, U Vojenske Nemocnice 1200, Prague 16902, Czech Republic
[6] Charles Univ Prague, Fac Sci, Dept Analyt Chem, Hlavova 8-2030, Prague 12800, Czech Republic
关键词
KRAS; mutation type; prognosis; EUS-FNB; ctDNA; liquid biopsy; pancreatic cancer; K-RAS; COLORECTAL-CANCER; ALLELIC LOSSES; CHEMOTHERAPY; ASSOCIATION; PROTEINS; SURVIVAL; BEHAVIOR; 18Q; P53;
D O I
10.3390/genes15101302
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Background/Objectives: Although the overall survival prognosis of patients in advanced stages of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is poor, typically ranging from days to months from diagnosis, there are rare cases of patients remaining in therapy for longer periods of time. Early estimations of survival prognosis would allow rational decisions on complex therapy interventions, including radical surgery and robust systemic therapy regimens. Understandably, there is great interest in finding prognostic markers that can be used for patient stratification. We determined the role of various KRAS mutations in the prognosis of PDAC patients using biopsy samples and circulating tumor DNA. Methods: A total of 118 patients with PDAC, clinically confirmed by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy (EUS-FNB), were included in the study. DNA was extracted from cytological slides following a standard cytology evaluation to ensure adequacy (viability and quantity) and to mark the tumor cell fraction. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) was extracted from plasma samples of 45 patients in stage IV of the disease. KRAS mutations in exons 12 and 13 were detected by denaturing capillary electrophoresis (DCE), revealing a minute presence of mutation-specific heteroduplexes. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were calculated for individual KRAS mutation types. Results: KRAS mutations were detected in 90% of tissue (106/118) and 44% of plasma (20/45) samples. All mutations were localized at exon 2, codon 12, with G12D (GGT > GAT) being the most frequent at 44% (47/106) and 65% (13/20), followed by other types including G12V (GGT > GTT) at 31% (33/106) and 10% (2/20), G12R (GGT > CGT) at 17% (18/106) and 10% (2/20), G12C (GGT/TGT) at 5% (5/106) and 0% (0/20) and G12S (GGT/AGT) at 1% (1/106) and 5% (1/20) in tissue and plasma samples, respectively. Two patients had two mutations simultaneously (G12V + G12S and G12D + G12S) in both types of samples (2%, 2/106 and 10%, 2/20 in tissue and plasma samples, respectively). The median survival of patients with the G12D mutation in tissues was less than half that of other patients (median survival 101 days, 95% CI: 80-600 vs. 228 days, 95% CI: 184-602), with a statistically significant overall difference in survival (p = 0.0080, log-rank test), and furthermore it was less than that of all combined patients with other mutation types (101 days, 95% CI: 80-600 vs. 210 days, 95% CI: 161-602, p = 0.0166). For plasma samples, the survival of patients with this mutation was six times shorter than that of patients without the G12D mutation (27 days, 95% CI: 8-334 vs. 161 days, 95% CI: 107-536, p = 0.0200). In contrast, patients with detected KRAS G12R in the tissue survived nearly twice as long as other patients in the aggregate (286 days, 95% CI: 70-602 vs. 162 days, 95% CI: 122-600, p = 0.0374) or patients with other KRAS mutations (286 days, 95% CI: 70-602 vs. 137 days, 95% CI: 107-600, p = 0.0257). Conclusions: Differentiation of specific KRAS mutations in EUS-FNB and ctDNA (above all, the crucial G12D and G12R) is feasible in routine management of PDAC patients and imperative for assessment of prognosis.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The prognostic value of KRAS mutations in patients with colorectal cancer
    Inoue, Yasuhiro
    Saigusa, Susumu
    Iwata, Takashi
    Okugawa, Yoshinaga
    Toiyama, Yuji
    Tanaka, Koji
    Uchida, Keiichi
    Mohri, Yasuhiko
    Kusunoki, Masato
    ONCOLOGY REPORTS, 2012, 28 (05) : 1579 - 1584
  • [2] Prognostic Value of KRAS Mutations in Colorectal Cancer Patients
    Koulouridi, Asimina
    Karagianni, Michaela
    Messaritakis, Ippokratis
    Sfakianaki, Maria
    Voutsina, Alexandra
    Trypaki, Maria
    Bachlitzanaki, Maria
    Koustas, Evangelos
    Karamouzis, Michalis, V
    Ntavatzikos, Anastasios
    Koumarianou, Anna
    Androulakis, Nikolaos
    Mavroudis, Dimitrios
    Tzardi, Maria
    Souglakos, John
    CANCERS, 2022, 14 (14)
  • [3] The prognostic role of microsatellite instability, codon-specific KRAS, and BRAF mutations in colon cancer
    Lin, Chun-Chi
    Lin, Jen-Kou
    Lin, Tzu-Chen
    Chen, Wei-Shone
    Yang, Shung-Haur
    Wang, Huann-Sheng
    Lan, Yuan-Tzu
    Jiang, Jeng-Kai
    Yang, Muh-Hwa
    Chang, Shih-Ching
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 110 (04) : 451 - 457
  • [4] Frequencies and Prognostic Role of KRAS and BRAF Mutations in Patients With Localized Pancreatic and Ampullary Adenocarcinomas
    Schultz, Nicolai Aagaard
    Roslind, Anne
    Christensen, Ib J.
    Horn, Thomas
    Hogdall, Estrid
    Pedersen, Lisbeth N.
    Kruhoffer, Mogens
    Burcharth, Flemming
    Wojdemann, Morten
    Johansen, Julia S.
    PANCREAS, 2012, 41 (05) : 759 - 766
  • [5] Prognostic Value of KRAS Exon-specific Mutations in Patients With Colorectal Cancer
    Asako, Kentaro
    Hayama, Tamuro
    Hashiguchi, Yojiro
    Miyata, Toshiya
    Fukushima, Yoshihisa
    Shimada, Ryu
    Kaneko, Kensuke
    Nozawa, Keijiro
    Matsuda, Keiji
    Fukagawa, Takeo
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2023, 43 (04) : 1563 - 1568
  • [6] Prognostic value of specific KRAS mutations in patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases
    Tonello, M.
    Baratti, D.
    Sammartino, P.
    Di Giorgio, A.
    Robella, M.
    Sassaroli, C.
    Framarini, M.
    Valle, M.
    Macri, A.
    Graziosi, L.
    Coccolini, F.
    Lippolis, P., V
    Gelmini, R.
    Deraco, M.
    Biacchi, D.
    Aulicino, M.
    Vaira, M.
    De Franciscis, S.
    Acapito, F.
    Carboni, F.
    Milone, E.
    Donini, A.
    Fugazzola, P.
    Faviana, P.
    Sorrentino, L.
    Pizzolato, E.
    Cenzi, C.
    Del Bianco, P.
    Sommariva, A.
    ESMO OPEN, 2024, 9 (04)
  • [7] The Prognostic Utility of KRAS Mutations in Tissue and Circulating Tumour DNA in Colorectal Cancer Patients
    Petit, Joel
    Carroll, Georgia
    Zhao, Jie
    Pockney, Peter
    Scott, Rodney J.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY INSIGHTS, 2024, 15 (01) : 107 - 121
  • [8] Prognostic role of KRAS mutations in Sardinian patients with colorectal carcinoma
    Palomba, Grazia
    Cossu, Antonio
    Paliogiannis, Panagiotis
    Pazzola, Antonio
    Baldino, Giovanni
    Scartozzi, Mario
    Ionta, Maria Teresa
    Ortu, Salvatore
    Capelli, Francesca
    Lanzillo, Annamaria
    Sedda, Tito
    Sanna, Giovanni
    Barca, Michela
    Virdis, Luciano
    Budroni, Mario
    Palmieri, Giuseppe
    ONCOLOGY LETTERS, 2016, 12 (02) : 1415 - 1421
  • [9] Clinical relevance of circulating KRAS mutated DNA in plasma from patients with advanced pancreatic cancer
    Tjensvoll, Kjersti
    Lapin, Morten
    Buhl, Tove
    Oltedal, Satu
    Berry, Katrine Steen-Ottosen
    Gilje, Bjornar
    Soreide, Jon Arne
    Javle, Millind
    Nordgard, Oddmund
    Smaaland, Rune
    MOLECULAR ONCOLOGY, 2016, 10 (04) : 635 - 643
  • [10] Prognostic Value of KRAS Mutations in the Peripheral Blood of Patients with Pancreatic Cancer: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Li, Weiwei
    Zhang, Xuejun
    Li, Yanhua
    Yue, Qiuju
    Cui, Miaohang
    Liu, Jinlong
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2022, 84 (SUPPL 2) : 476 - 484