Effect of the number of passes on diagnostic performance of EUS fi ne-needle biopsy of solid pancreatic masses: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:4
作者
Chalhoub, Jean M. [1 ]
Hawa, Fadi [2 ]
Grantham, Tyler [1 ]
Lester, Janice [2 ]
Carpenter, Eileen S. [2 ]
Mendoza-Ladd, Antonio [3 ]
Wani, Sachin [4 ]
Machicado, Jorge D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Northwell Hlth, Staten Isl Univ Hosp, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Dept Internal Med, Staten Isl, NY USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Div Gastroenterol, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[3] Univ Calif Davis, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Sacramento, CA USA
[4] Univ Colorado, Anschutz Med Ctr, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Aurora, CO USA
关键词
FORK-TIP; ASPIRATION; LESIONS; 22G; CELLULARITY; CANCER; YIELD;
D O I
10.1016/j.gie.2024.05.022
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Aims: The optimal number of passes to maximize the diagnostic ability of EUS fi ne-needle biopsy (FNB) of solid pancreatic masses (SPMs) is not well known. We conducted a systematic review to evaluate the impact of the incremental number of passes on diagnostic accuracy, tissue adequacy, and diagnostic yield for EUS-FNB of SPMs. Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Central for randomized controlled trials comparing per-pass diagnostic outcomes of FNB needles in patients with SPMs. Meta-analysis was conducted using random-effects models. A separate analysis was performed on studies that used contemporary Franseen and fork-tip needles. Results: Overall, 19 randomized controlled trials (N = 3552) were identified. fi ed. For EUS-FNB of SPMs, 3 passes with any FNB needle outperformed 2 passes for accuracy (odds ratio [OR], 1.58; 95% confidence fi dence interval [CI], 1.202.09; I 2 = 0%), adequacy (OR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.30-2.83; I 2 = 61%), and yield (OR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.37-3.27; I 2 = 14%). Adding a fourth or fi fth pass resulted in no significant fi cant improvement in diagnostic parameters. When using contemporary FNB needles, adding a second to a single pass significantly fi cantly improved accuracy (OR, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.23-2.63; I 2 = 0%), adequacy (OR, 2.19; 95% CI, 1.65-2.90; I 2 = 0%), and yield (OR, 2.72; 95% CI, 1.50-4.95; I 2 = 0%). Adding a third pass to a second pass with contemporary needles improved adequacy (OR, 2.96; 95% CI, 1.97-4.46; I 2 = 0%) but did not provide better diagnostic accuracy or yield. Conclusions: Two passes with Franseen or fork-tip needles and 3 passes with any FNB needle suffice fi ce to provide optimal diagnostic performance for EUS-FNB of SPMs, without additional diagnostic benefits fi ts with more passes. Our results can inform future guidelines and quality benchmarks. (Gastrointest Endosc 2024;100:595-604.)
引用
收藏
页码:595 / 604.e8
页数:18
相关论文
共 32 条
[21]   Endoscopic tissue sampling - Part 1: Upper gastrointestinal and hepatopancreatobiliary tracts. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline [J].
Pouw, Roos E. ;
Barret, Maximilien ;
Biermann, Katharina ;
Bisschops, Raf ;
Czako, Laszlo ;
Gecse, Krisztina B. ;
de Hertogh, Gert ;
Hucl, Tomas ;
Iacucci, Marietta ;
Jansen, Marnix ;
Rutter, Matthew ;
Savarino, Edoardo ;
Spaander, Manon C. W. ;
Schmidt, Peter T. ;
Vieth, Michael ;
Dinis-Ribeiro, Mario ;
van Hooft, Jeanin E. .
ENDOSCOPY, 2021, 53 (11) :1174-1188
[22]  
R Core Team, R: A language and environment for statistical computing
[23]   Cancer statistics, 2022 [J].
Siegel, Rebecca L. ;
Miller, Kimberly D. ;
Fuchs, Hannah E. ;
Jemal, Ahmedin .
CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2022, 72 (01) :7-33
[24]   Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma, Version 1.2019 [J].
Tempero, Margaret A. ;
Malafa, Mokenge P. ;
Chiorean, E. Gabriela ;
Czito, Brian ;
Scaife, Courtney ;
Narang, Amol K. ;
Fountzilas, Christos ;
Wolpin, Brian M. ;
Al-Hawary, Mahmoud ;
Asbun, Horacio ;
Behrman, Stephen W. ;
Benson, Al B., III ;
Binder, Ellen ;
Cardin, Dana B. ;
Cha, Charles ;
Chung, Vincent ;
Dillhoff, Mary ;
Dotan, Efrat ;
Ferrone, Cristina R. ;
Fisher, George ;
Hardacre, Jeffrey ;
Hawkins, William G. ;
Ko, Andrew H. ;
LoConte, Noelle ;
Lowy, Andrew M. ;
Moravek, Cassadie ;
Nakakura, Eric K. ;
O'Reilly, Eileen M. ;
Obando, Jorge ;
Reddy, Sushanth ;
Thayer, Sarah ;
Wolff, Robert A. ;
Burns, Jennifer L. ;
Zuccarino-Catania, Griselda .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK, 2019, 17 (03) :203-210
[25]   Evaluation of 22G fine-needle aspiration (FNA) versus fine-needle biopsy (FNB) for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of pancreatic lesions: a prospective comparison study [J].
Tian, Li ;
Tang, An-Liu ;
Zhang, Lei ;
Liu, Xiao-Wen ;
Li, Jing-Bo ;
Wang, Fen ;
Shen, Shou-Rong ;
Wang, Xiao-Yan .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2018, 32 (08) :3533-3539
[26]   Comparison of fine-needle aspiration and fine-needle biopsy devices for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid lesions: a systemic review and meta-analysis [J].
van Riet, Priscilla A. ;
Erler, Nicole S. ;
Bruno, Marco J. ;
Cahen, Djuna L. .
ENDOSCOPY, 2021, 53 (04) :411-423
[27]   Mapping international practice patterns in EUS-guided tissue sampling: outcome of a global survey [J].
van Riet, Priscilla A. ;
Cahen, Djuna L. ;
Poley, Jan-Werner ;
Bruno, Marco J. .
ENDOSCOPY INTERNATIONAL OPEN, 2016, 4 (03) :E360-E370
[28]   Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package [J].
Viechtbauer, Wolfgang .
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE, 2010, 36 (03) :1-48
[29]   Quality indicators for EUS [J].
Wani, Sachin ;
Wallace, Michael B. ;
Cohen, Jonathan ;
Pike, Irving M. ;
Adler, Douglas G. ;
Kochman, Michael L. ;
Lieb, John G., II ;
Park, Walter G. ;
Rizk, Maged K. ;
Sawhney, Mandeep S. ;
Shaheen, Nicholas J. ;
Tokar, Jeffrey L. .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2015, 81 (01) :67-80
[30]   Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Fine-needle Aspiration of Lymph Nodes and Solid Masses Factors Influencing the Cellularity and Adequacy of the Aspirate [J].
Wee, Eric ;
Lakhtakia, Sandeep ;
Gupta, Rajesh ;
Sekaran, Anuradha ;
Kalapala, Rakesh ;
Monga, Amitabh ;
Arjunan, Saravanan ;
Reddy, Duvvuru Nageshwar .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2012, 46 (06) :487-493