Effect of the number of passes on diagnostic performance of EUS fi ne-needle biopsy of solid pancreatic masses: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:4
作者
Chalhoub, Jean M. [1 ]
Hawa, Fadi [2 ]
Grantham, Tyler [1 ]
Lester, Janice [2 ]
Carpenter, Eileen S. [2 ]
Mendoza-Ladd, Antonio [3 ]
Wani, Sachin [4 ]
Machicado, Jorge D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Northwell Hlth, Staten Isl Univ Hosp, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Dept Internal Med, Staten Isl, NY USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Div Gastroenterol, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[3] Univ Calif Davis, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Sacramento, CA USA
[4] Univ Colorado, Anschutz Med Ctr, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Aurora, CO USA
关键词
FORK-TIP; ASPIRATION; LESIONS; 22G; CELLULARITY; CANCER; YIELD;
D O I
10.1016/j.gie.2024.05.022
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Aims: The optimal number of passes to maximize the diagnostic ability of EUS fi ne-needle biopsy (FNB) of solid pancreatic masses (SPMs) is not well known. We conducted a systematic review to evaluate the impact of the incremental number of passes on diagnostic accuracy, tissue adequacy, and diagnostic yield for EUS-FNB of SPMs. Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Central for randomized controlled trials comparing per-pass diagnostic outcomes of FNB needles in patients with SPMs. Meta-analysis was conducted using random-effects models. A separate analysis was performed on studies that used contemporary Franseen and fork-tip needles. Results: Overall, 19 randomized controlled trials (N = 3552) were identified. fi ed. For EUS-FNB of SPMs, 3 passes with any FNB needle outperformed 2 passes for accuracy (odds ratio [OR], 1.58; 95% confidence fi dence interval [CI], 1.202.09; I 2 = 0%), adequacy (OR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.30-2.83; I 2 = 61%), and yield (OR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.37-3.27; I 2 = 14%). Adding a fourth or fi fth pass resulted in no significant fi cant improvement in diagnostic parameters. When using contemporary FNB needles, adding a second to a single pass significantly fi cantly improved accuracy (OR, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.23-2.63; I 2 = 0%), adequacy (OR, 2.19; 95% CI, 1.65-2.90; I 2 = 0%), and yield (OR, 2.72; 95% CI, 1.50-4.95; I 2 = 0%). Adding a third pass to a second pass with contemporary needles improved adequacy (OR, 2.96; 95% CI, 1.97-4.46; I 2 = 0%) but did not provide better diagnostic accuracy or yield. Conclusions: Two passes with Franseen or fork-tip needles and 3 passes with any FNB needle suffice fi ce to provide optimal diagnostic performance for EUS-FNB of SPMs, without additional diagnostic benefits fi ts with more passes. Our results can inform future guidelines and quality benchmarks. (Gastrointest Endosc 2024;100:595-604.)
引用
收藏
页码:595 / 604.e8
页数:18
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Comparing Needles and Methods of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Biopsy to Optimize Specimen Quality and Diagnostic Accuracy for Patients With Pancreatic Masses in a Randomized Trial [J].
Bang, Ji Young ;
Krall, Konrad ;
Jhala, Nirag ;
Singh, Charanjeet ;
Tejani, Mohamedtaki ;
Arnoletti, Juan Pablo ;
Navaneethan, Udayakumar ;
Hawes, Robert ;
Varadarajulu, Shyam .
CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2021, 19 (04) :825-+
[2]   Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needle biopsy alone vs. EUS-guided fine needle aspiration with rapid onsite evaluation in pancreatic lesions: a multicenter randomized trial [J].
Chen, Yen-, I ;
Chatterjee, Avijit ;
Berger, Robert ;
Kanber, Yonca ;
Wyse, Jonathan ;
Lam, Eric ;
Gan, Ian ;
Auger, Manon ;
Kenshil, Sana ;
Telford, Jennifer ;
Donnellan, Fergal ;
Quinlan, James ;
Lutzak, Gregory ;
Alshamsi, Fatma ;
Parent, Josee ;
Waschke, Kevin ;
Alghamdi, Adel ;
Barkun, Jeffrey ;
Metrakos, Peter ;
Chaudhury, Prosanto ;
Martel, Myriam ;
Dorreen, Alastair ;
Candido, Kristen ;
Miller, Corey ;
Adam, Viviane ;
Barkun, Alan ;
Zogopoulos, George ;
Wong, Clarence .
ENDOSCOPY, 2022, 54 (01) :4-12
[3]   Analysis of Fine-Needle Biopsy vs Fine-Needle Aspiration in Diagnosis of Pancreatic and Abdominal Masses: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial [J].
Cheng, Bin ;
Zhang, Yueming ;
Chen, Qian ;
Sun, Bo ;
Deng, Zhuang ;
Shan, Hongbo ;
Dou, Lizhou ;
Wang, Jinglin ;
Li, Yawen ;
Yang, Xiujiang ;
Jiang, Tianan ;
Xu, Guoliang ;
Wang, Guiqi .
CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2018, 16 (08) :1314-1321
[4]   A prospective, randomized, multicenter clinical trial comparing 25-gauge and 20-gauge biopsy needles for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic lesions [J].
Cho, Eunae ;
Park, Chang-Hwan ;
Kim, Tae Hyeon ;
Cho, Chang-Min ;
Seo, Dong Wan ;
Kim, Jaihwan ;
Choi, Jun Ho ;
Moon, Sung-Hoon .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2020, 34 (03) :1310-1317
[5]   Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine-needle Biopsy With or Without Rapid On-site Evaluation for Diagnosis of Solid Pancreatic Lesions: A Randomized Controlled Non-Inferiority Trial [J].
Crino, Stefano Francesco ;
Di Mitri, Roberto ;
Nguyen, Nam Q. ;
Tarantino, Ilaria ;
de Nucci, Germana ;
Deprez, Pierre H. ;
Carrara, Silvia ;
Kitano, Masayuki ;
Shami, Vanessa M. ;
Fernandez-Esparrach, Gloria ;
Poley, Jan-Werner ;
Baldaque-Silva, Francisco ;
Itoi, Takao ;
Manfrin, Erminia ;
Bernardoni, Laura ;
Gabbrielli, Armando ;
Conte, Elisabetta ;
Unti, Elettra ;
Naidu, Jeevinesh ;
Ruszkiewicz, Andrew ;
Amata, Michele ;
Liotta, Rosa ;
Manes, Gianpiero ;
Di Nuovo, Franca ;
Borbath, Ivan ;
Komuta, Mina ;
Lamonaca, Laura ;
Rahal, Daoud ;
Hatamaru, Keiichi ;
Itonaga, Masahiro ;
Rizzatti, Gianenrico ;
Costamagna, Guido ;
Inzani, Frediano ;
Curatolo, Mariangela ;
Strand, Daniel S. ;
Wang, Andrew Y. ;
Gines, Angels ;
Sendino, Oriol ;
Signoretti, Marianna ;
van Driel, Lydi M. J. W. ;
Dolapcsiev, Karoly ;
Matsunami, Yukitoshi ;
van der Merwe, Schalk ;
van Malenstein, Hannah ;
Locatelli, Francesca ;
Correale, Loredana ;
Scarpa, Aldo ;
Larghi, Alberto .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2021, 161 (03) :899-+
[6]   Randomized trial comparing fork-tip and side-fenestrated needles for EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy of solid pancreatic lesions [J].
Crino, Stefano Francesco ;
Le Grazie, Marco ;
Manfrin, Erminia ;
Bellocchi, Maria Cristina Conti ;
Bernardoni, Laura ;
Granato, Anna ;
Locatelli, Francesca ;
Parisi, Alice ;
Di Stefano, Serena ;
Frulloni, Luca ;
Larghi, Alberto ;
Gabbrielli, Armando .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2020, 92 (03) :648-+
[7]   ACG Clinical Guideline: Diagnosis and Management of Biliary Strictures [J].
Elmunzer, B. Joseph ;
Maranki, Jennifer L. ;
Gomez, Victoria ;
Tavakkoli, Anna ;
Sauer, Bryan G. ;
Limketkai, Berkeley N. ;
Brennan, Emily A. ;
Attridge, Elaine M. ;
Brigham, Tara J. ;
Wang, Andrew Y. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2023, 118 (03) :405-426
[8]   Randomized study comparing endoscopic ultrasound-guided Trucut biopsy and fine needle aspiration with high suction [J].
Gerke, H. ;
Rizk, M. K. ;
Vanderheyden, A. D. ;
Jensen, C. S. .
CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2010, 21 (01) :44-51
[9]   Comparative diagnostic performance of end-cutting fine-needle biopsy needles for EUS tissue sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a network meta-analysis [J].
Gkolfakis, Paraskevas ;
Crino, Stefano Francesco ;
Tziatzios, Georgios ;
Ramai, Daryl ;
Papaefthymiou, Apostolis ;
Papanikolaou, Ioannis S. ;
Triantafyllou, Konstantinos ;
Arvanitakis, Marianna ;
Lisotti, Andrea ;
Fusaroli, Pietro ;
Mangiavillano, Benedetto ;
Carrara, Silvia ;
Repici, Alessandro ;
Hassan, Cesare ;
Facciorusso, Antonio .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2022, 95 (06) :1067-+
[10]   Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Aspiration versus Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Biopsy for Pancreatic Cancer Diagnosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [J].
Hassan, Galab M. ;
Laporte, Louise ;
Paquin, Sarto C. ;
Menard, Charles ;
Sahai, Anand, V ;
Masse, Benoit ;
Trottier, Helen .
DIAGNOSTICS, 2022, 12 (12)