A matter of time: Publication dates in Scopus

被引:3
作者
Liu, Weishu [1 ]
Wang, Panpan [1 ]
Wang, Haifeng [2 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Management, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Int Studies Univ, Sch Business & Management, Shanghai 200083, Peoples R China
关键词
Bibliographic database; bibliometric analysis; data quality; publication date; Scopus; WEB; SCIENCE; ERRORS; INFORMATION; DATABASE;
D O I
10.1177/01655515241293753
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Similar to the Web of Science, Scopus is also a widely used abstract and citation database. Researchers typically employ the Year of Publication or Date of Publication field in Scopus to retrieve, filter and analyse indexed records. However, the inconsistent retrieval results obtained by these two fields in Scopus, which was occasionally observed in this study, may cause confusion among users. In this brief research article, we seek to elucidate this phenomenon by utilising indexed records in Scopus from the past 50 years. Empirical evidence indicates that inconsistent retrieval results retrieved by these two search fields are attributable to discrepancies in the publication year information provided in the Year of Publication and Date of Publication fields in Scopus. Specifically, missing year information in the Date of Publication field, incorrect year information in the Date of Publication field or in the Year of Publication field, and inconsistent use of different versions of publication dates in these two fields are four representative causes for the observed inconsistencies in retrieval results in Scopus. This article concludes by outlining the potential consequences of these issues and suggesting ways to effectively address them.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies [J].
Baas, Jeroen ;
Schotten, Michiel ;
Plume, Andrew ;
Cote, Gregoire ;
Karimi, Reza .
QUANTITATIVE SCIENCE STUDIES, 2020, 1 (01) :377-386
[2]   Web of Science as a data source for research on scientific and scholarly activity [J].
Birkle, Caroline ;
Pendlebury, David A. ;
Schnell, Joshua ;
Adams, Jonathan .
QUANTITATIVE SCIENCE STUDIES, 2020, 1 (01) :363-376
[3]   The need to develop tailored tools for improving the quality of thematic bibliometric analyses: Evidence from papers published in Sustainability and Scientometrics [J].
Cabezas-Clavijo, Alvaro ;
Milanes-Guisado, Yusnelkis ;
Alba-Ruiz, Ruben ;
Delgado-Vazquez, Angel M. .
JOURNAL OF DATA AND INFORMATION SCIENCE, 2023, 8 (04) :10-35
[4]   Empirical analysis and classification of database errors in Scopus and Web of Science [J].
Franceschini, Fiorenzo ;
Maisano, Domenico ;
Mastrogiacomo, Luca .
JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2016, 10 (04) :933-953
[5]   Do Scopus and WoS correct "old" omitted citations? [J].
Franceschini, Fiorenzo ;
Maisano, Domenico ;
Mastrogiacomo, Luca .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2016, 107 (02) :321-335
[6]   The museum of errors/horrors in Scopus [J].
Franceschini, Fiorenzo ;
Maisano, Domenico ;
Mastrogiacomo, Luca .
JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2016, 10 (01) :174-182
[7]   Comparison of datasets citation coverage in Google Scholar, Web of Science, Scopus, Crossref, and DataCite [J].
Gerasimov, Irina ;
Binita, K. C. ;
Mehrabian, Armin ;
Acker, James ;
McGuire, Michael P. .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2024, 129 (07) :3681-3704
[8]   Bibliometric studies outside the information science and library science field: uncontainable or uncontrollable? [J].
Gonzalez-Alcaide, Gregorio .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2021, 126 (08) :6837-6870
[10]   What every Researcher should know about Searching - Clarified Concepts, Search Advice, and an Agenda to improve Finding in Academia [J].
Gusenbauer, Michael ;
Haddaway, Neal R. .
RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, 2021, 12 (02) :136-147