Assessment of risk of malignancy with application of Sydney classification for reporting of lymph node cytopathology in pediatric population: An institutional experience

被引:0
作者
Sable, Mukund [1 ]
Panda, Manisha [1 ]
Acharya, Prapti [1 ]
Mishra, Pritinanda [1 ]
Purkait, Suvendu [1 ]
Sethy, Madhusmita [1 ]
Ayyanar, Pavithra [1 ]
Adhya, Amit Kumar [1 ]
Patra, Susama [1 ]
机构
[1] All India Inst Med Sci, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
关键词
cytology; discordant; fine-needle aspiration cytology; lymph node; lymphoma; malignant; risk of malignancy; Sydney; FINE-NEEDLE-ASPIRATION; CERVICAL LYMPHADENOPATHY; CYTOLOGY; CHILDREN; BIOPSY;
D O I
10.1002/cncy.22936
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BackgroundFine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) has been used as the first line approach to lymphadenopathy, which is a common presentation in pediatric age group. The Sydney system for reporting of lymph node (LN) cytology has been proposed to assess the reliability, performance, and accuracy of the aspiration procedure. This study intends to assess the role of FNAC in the pediatric population according to the Sydney system.MethodsThis was a retrospective observational study from a tertiary care center in Eastern India. All the patients in the age group of 0-18 years evaluated during years 2016-2024 were reclassified according to the Sydney system. Based on the cytology and histology diagnoses, the cases were categorized into true-negative, true-positive, false-negative, and false-positive. The overall sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), accuracy, and risk of malignancy (ROM) was calculated for each category.ResultsOf 803 cases of pediatric LN-FNACs, 35 (4.35%) cases were reported as inadequate (L1), 689 (85.8%) cases as benign (L2), four (0.49%) cases as atypical cells of undetermined significance (L3), 22 cases as suspicious for malignancy (L4), and 53 (6.6%) cases as malignant (L5). The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy was 72.34%, 98.48%, 97.14%, 83.33%, and 87.61%, respectively. The ROM was 16.67% for L2 and 100% for both L4 and L5 categories.ConclusionsFNAC is a highly accurate and specific test for LN pathology, especially in the pediatric population. The incorporation of the Sydney system helps to achieve uniformity and reproducibility in LN cytology diagnosis.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 30 条
[21]   Lymph node FNA cytology: Diagnostic performance and clinical implications of proposed diagnostic categories [J].
Makarenko, Vladislav V. ;
DeLelys, Michelle E. ;
Hasserjian, Robert P. ;
Ly, Amy .
CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2022, 130 (02) :144-153
[22]   A Comprehensive Review of the Newest World Health Organization (WHO) Cytopathology Reporting Systems [J].
Nigam, Jitendra Singh ;
Bharti, Jyotsna Naresh ;
Rath, Ashutosh ;
Pradeep, Immanuel .
ADVANCES IN ANATOMIC PATHOLOGY, 2023, 30 (05) :301-306
[23]  
Rashmi KTR, 2008, J CYTOL, V25, P10
[24]   Lymph node fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) in paediatric patients: Why not? Diagnostic accuracy of FNAC in a series of heterogeneous paediatric lymphadenopathies [J].
Ronchi, Andrea ;
Caputo, Alessandro ;
Pagliuca, Francesca ;
Montella, Marco ;
Marino, Federica Zito ;
Zeppa, Pio ;
Franco, Renato ;
Cozzolino, Immacolata .
PATHOLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2021, 217
[25]  
Sawaimul K., 2018, Indian J Pathol Oncol, V5, P184
[26]   Nodular sclerosis classical Hodgkin lymphoma grade 2: A diagnostic challenge to the cytopathologists [J].
Sharma, Sudha ;
Dey, Pranab ;
Mitra, Suvradeep ;
Rajwanshi, Arvind ;
Nijhawan, Raje ;
Srinivasan, Radhika ;
Gupta, Nalini ;
Das, Ashim .
CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2017, 125 (02) :104-113
[27]  
Silas O A, 2015, J Otol Rhinol, V4, DOI 10.4172/2324-8785.1000211
[28]  
Singh N., 2016, Int J Contemp Med Res, V3, P1347
[29]   The role of fine-needle aspiration cytology in children with persistent or suspicious lymphadenopathy [J].
van de Schoot, L ;
Aronson, DC ;
Behrendt, H ;
Bras, J .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2001, 36 (01) :7-11
[30]   Fine-Needle Aspiration and Core Needle Biopsy: An Update on 2 Common Minimally Invasive Tissue Sampling Modalities [J].
VanderLaan, Paul A. .
CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2016, 124 (12) :862-870