Evaluating the efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation for refractory epilepsy: A meta-analysis of RCTs and non-RCTs

被引:0
|
作者
Sun, Yuteng [1 ]
Tang, Xian [4 ]
Li, Ye [1 ]
Gao, Chao [1 ,2 ]
Shen, Zhiyuan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Guo, Xiaosu [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Guo, Xin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wei, Zibin [1 ,2 ]
Jia, Yicun [1 ]
Zheng, Mengyi [1 ]
Zhang, Yaxin [1 ]
Xing, Yuan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Tian, Shujuan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Hebei Med Univ, Hosp 1, Dept Neurol, Shijiazhuang 050030, Hebei, Peoples R China
[2] Capital Med Univ, Hebei Hosp, Xuanwu Hosp, Dept Neurol, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, Peoples R China
[3] Neuromed Technol Innovat Ctr Hebei Prov, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, Peoples R China
[4] Hebei Med Univ, Hosp 1, Dept Rehabil Med, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, Peoples R China
关键词
Transcranial direct current stimulation; tDCS; Refractory epilepsy; Meta-analysis; TEMPORAL-LOBE EPILEPSY; HUMAN MOTOR CORTEX; NONINVASIVE BRAIN-STIMULATION; TDCS; MODEL; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2024.107456
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
An increasing number of research indicate that non-invasive neurostimulation techniques, like transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), can effectively control refractory epilepsy. While previous meta-analyses have primarily focused on randomized controlled trials (RCTs), this study expands the scope by including both RCTs and non-RCTs to provide a more comprehensive assessment of tDCS efficacy in treating refractory epilepsy. Through a systematic search of "PUBMED, Embase and Cochrane", we sought relevant studies related to the research topic. We utilized the Cochrane Collaboration tool to assess the risk of bias for the RCTs and the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) tool to evaluate the quality of the non-RCTs included in this meta-analysis. In addition, a protocol for this meta-analysis was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024496837 http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/ PROSPERO). A total of 14 studies, including 8 RCTs and 6 non-RCTs , involving 307 subjects with refractory epilepsy, were included in this meta-analysis. The combined analysis of RCTs and non-RCTs indicated that tDCS was effective in reducing seizure frequency (SF) in refractory epilepsy patients, with significant improvements observed both four weeks (MD = -4.54; p < 0.01; 95 % CI = -5.69 to -3.38) and eight weeks (MD = -3.49; p < 0.01; 95 % CI = -5.37 to -1.61) after stimulation. There were no statistically significant differences in Interictal Epileptiform Discharges (IEDs) shortly after stimulation (MD = -3.59; p = 0.42; 95 % CI = -12.33-5.16). However, a reduction was observed at four weeks (MD = -5.28; p < 0.01; 95 % CI = -6.88 to -3.68) and eight weeks post-stimulation (MD = -3.37; p < 0.01; 95 % CI = -5.35 to -1.40). The patient's adverse reactions were mild, and they could be relieved shortly after discontinuation of the stimulus. The quality of evidence across outcomes was assessed as moderate. The results indicate that tDCS demonstrates promising efficacy and safety in managing seizures in refractory epilepsy. While this meta-analysis provides valuable findings, additional large-scale randomized controlled trials are needed to further confirm the efficacy of tDCS for refractory epilepsy.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Efficacy and Safety of Drug Treatments for Chronic Insomnia in Adults: A Meta-analysis of RCTs
    Nina Buscemi
    Ben Vandermeer
    Carol Friesen
    Liza Bialy
    Michelle Tubman
    Maria Ospina
    Terry P. Klassen
    Manisha Witmans
    Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2007, 22
  • [32] CAN EFFICACY OF BLINDING IN RANDOMIZED CONTROL TRIALS (RCTS) BE DOCUMENTED BY META-ANALYSIS
    REITMAN, D
    CHALMERS, TC
    NAGALINGAM, R
    SACKS, H
    CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1988, 9 (03): : 250 - 250
  • [33] The efficacy and safety of drug treatments for chronic insomnia in adults: A meta-analysis of RCTs
    Buscemi, Nina
    Vandermeer, Ben
    Friesen, Carol
    Bialy, Liza
    Tubman, Michelle
    Ospina, Maria
    Klassen, Terry P.
    Witmans, Manisha
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2007, 22 (09) : 1335 - 1350
  • [34] Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in the treatment of depression: Systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy and tolerability
    Meron, Daniel
    Hedger, Nicholas
    Garner, Matthew
    Baldwin, David S.
    NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS, 2015, 57 : 46 - 62
  • [35] Efficacy and acceptability of transcranial direct current stimulation for treating depression: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Zhang, Ruibin
    Lam, Charlene L. M.
    Peng, Xiaoling
    Zhang, Dongming
    Zhang, Chichen
    Huang, Ruiwang
    Lee, Tatia M. C.
    NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS, 2021, 126 : 481 - 490
  • [36] A systematic review and meta-analysis on RCTs evaluating combination laser treatment in skin rejuvenation
    Mohammad, A. Pour
    Goodarzi, A.
    Mesgarha, M. Gholizadeh
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE DERMATOLOGY, 2022, 142 (08) : B17 - B17
  • [37] Cathodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Refractory Epilepsy: A Noninvasive Neuromodulation Therapy
    San-Juan, Daniel
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2021, 38 (06) : 503 - 508
  • [38] EFFICACY OF SOCIAL COGNITIVE REMEDIATION IN SCHIZOPHRENIA PATIENTS: A META-ANALYSIS INCLUDING 22 RCTS
    Mueller, D. R.
    Schmidt, S. J.
    Roder, V.
    EUROPEAN PSYCHIATRY, 2011, 26
  • [39] Transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation affect explicit but not implicit emotion regulation: a meta-analysis
    Xiufu Qiu
    Zhenhong He
    Xueying Cao
    Dandan Zhang
    Behavioral and Brain Functions, 19
  • [40] Transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation affect explicit but not implicit emotion regulation: a meta-analysis
    Qiu, Xiufu
    He, Zhenhong
    Cao, Xueying
    Zhang, Dandan
    BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN FUNCTIONS, 2023, 19 (01)