Evaluating the efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation for refractory epilepsy: A meta-analysis of RCTs and non-RCTs

被引:0
|
作者
Sun, Yuteng [1 ]
Tang, Xian [4 ]
Li, Ye [1 ]
Gao, Chao [1 ,2 ]
Shen, Zhiyuan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Guo, Xiaosu [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Guo, Xin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wei, Zibin [1 ,2 ]
Jia, Yicun [1 ]
Zheng, Mengyi [1 ]
Zhang, Yaxin [1 ]
Xing, Yuan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Tian, Shujuan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Hebei Med Univ, Hosp 1, Dept Neurol, Shijiazhuang 050030, Hebei, Peoples R China
[2] Capital Med Univ, Hebei Hosp, Xuanwu Hosp, Dept Neurol, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, Peoples R China
[3] Neuromed Technol Innovat Ctr Hebei Prov, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, Peoples R China
[4] Hebei Med Univ, Hosp 1, Dept Rehabil Med, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, Peoples R China
关键词
Transcranial direct current stimulation; tDCS; Refractory epilepsy; Meta-analysis; TEMPORAL-LOBE EPILEPSY; HUMAN MOTOR CORTEX; NONINVASIVE BRAIN-STIMULATION; TDCS; MODEL; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2024.107456
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
An increasing number of research indicate that non-invasive neurostimulation techniques, like transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), can effectively control refractory epilepsy. While previous meta-analyses have primarily focused on randomized controlled trials (RCTs), this study expands the scope by including both RCTs and non-RCTs to provide a more comprehensive assessment of tDCS efficacy in treating refractory epilepsy. Through a systematic search of "PUBMED, Embase and Cochrane", we sought relevant studies related to the research topic. We utilized the Cochrane Collaboration tool to assess the risk of bias for the RCTs and the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) tool to evaluate the quality of the non-RCTs included in this meta-analysis. In addition, a protocol for this meta-analysis was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024496837 http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/ PROSPERO). A total of 14 studies, including 8 RCTs and 6 non-RCTs , involving 307 subjects with refractory epilepsy, were included in this meta-analysis. The combined analysis of RCTs and non-RCTs indicated that tDCS was effective in reducing seizure frequency (SF) in refractory epilepsy patients, with significant improvements observed both four weeks (MD = -4.54; p < 0.01; 95 % CI = -5.69 to -3.38) and eight weeks (MD = -3.49; p < 0.01; 95 % CI = -5.37 to -1.61) after stimulation. There were no statistically significant differences in Interictal Epileptiform Discharges (IEDs) shortly after stimulation (MD = -3.59; p = 0.42; 95 % CI = -12.33-5.16). However, a reduction was observed at four weeks (MD = -5.28; p < 0.01; 95 % CI = -6.88 to -3.68) and eight weeks post-stimulation (MD = -3.37; p < 0.01; 95 % CI = -5.35 to -1.40). The patient's adverse reactions were mild, and they could be relieved shortly after discontinuation of the stimulus. The quality of evidence across outcomes was assessed as moderate. The results indicate that tDCS demonstrates promising efficacy and safety in managing seizures in refractory epilepsy. While this meta-analysis provides valuable findings, additional large-scale randomized controlled trials are needed to further confirm the efficacy of tDCS for refractory epilepsy.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Transcranial direct current stimulation in schizophrenia: a systemic review and meta-analysis
    Lee, Tae Young
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2016, 19 : 13 - 13
  • [22] Transcranial direct current stimulation for empathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Bahji, Anees
    Forth, Evan
    Yang, Cheng-Chang
    Khalifa, Najat
    SOCIAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2021, 16 (03) : 232 - 251
  • [23] Meta-analysis of the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on inhibitory control
    Schroeder, Philipp A.
    Schwippel, Tobias
    Wolz, Ines
    Svaldi, Jennifer
    BRAIN STIMULATION, 2020, 13 (05) : 1159 - 1167
  • [24] Transcranial direct current stimulation on hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Silva-Filho, Edson
    Silva Meira, Quenia Gramile
    Rodrigues, Ayrlla Da Costa
    Fontes Marques, Camille Louise
    Oliveira, Paloma
    Pegado, Rodrigo
    ACTA CARDIOLOGICA, 2024,
  • [25] Transcranial direct current stimulation in the treatment of major depression: a meta-analysis
    Kalu, U. G.
    Sexton, C. E.
    Loo, C. K.
    Ebmeier, K. P.
    PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 2012, 42 (09) : 1791 - 1800
  • [26] The Efficacy of Ramucirumab in the Treatment of Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of RCTs
    Yang, Hongqiong
    Zhou, Yaojun
    Wang, Liangzhi
    Gu, Tianyi
    Lv, Mengjia
    Sun, Jinling
    Tu, Chao
    He, Junbo
    GASTROENTEROLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2021, 2021
  • [27] A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Creative Thinking
    Ding, Ke
    Chen, Qunlin
    Chen, Zihan
    Yang, Yingkai
    Yu, Rongjun
    Kenett, Yoed N.
    Qiu, Jiang
    PSYCHOLOGY OF AESTHETICS CREATIVITY AND THE ARTS, 2024,
  • [28] A meta-analysis of transcranial direct current stimulation for schizophrenia: "Is more better?"
    Kim, Julia
    Iwata, Yusuke
    Plitman, Eric
    Caravaggio, Fernando
    Chung, Jun Ku
    Shah, Parita
    Blumberger, Daniel M.
    Pollock, Bruce G.
    Remington, Gary
    Graff-Guerrero, Ariel
    Gerretsen, Philip
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 2019, 110 : 117 - 126
  • [29] THE SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF MESENCHYMAL STROMAL CELLS FOR TREATING ARDS: A META-ANALYSIS OF RCTS
    Wang, Fengyun
    Li, Yiming
    Peng, Zhiyong
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2022, 50 (01) : 525 - 525
  • [30] EFFICACY OF LURASIDONE IN SCHIZOPHRENIA: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF RCTS WITH ACTIVE COMPARATORS
    Nosaka, T.
    Hagi, K.
    Pikalov, A.
    Loebel, A.
    Kane, J.
    AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2017, 51 : 152 - 152