Evaluating the efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation for refractory epilepsy: A meta-analysis of RCTs and non-RCTs

被引:0
|
作者
Sun, Yuteng [1 ]
Tang, Xian [4 ]
Li, Ye [1 ]
Gao, Chao [1 ,2 ]
Shen, Zhiyuan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Guo, Xiaosu [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Guo, Xin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wei, Zibin [1 ,2 ]
Jia, Yicun [1 ]
Zheng, Mengyi [1 ]
Zhang, Yaxin [1 ]
Xing, Yuan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Tian, Shujuan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Hebei Med Univ, Hosp 1, Dept Neurol, Shijiazhuang 050030, Hebei, Peoples R China
[2] Capital Med Univ, Hebei Hosp, Xuanwu Hosp, Dept Neurol, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, Peoples R China
[3] Neuromed Technol Innovat Ctr Hebei Prov, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, Peoples R China
[4] Hebei Med Univ, Hosp 1, Dept Rehabil Med, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, Peoples R China
关键词
Transcranial direct current stimulation; tDCS; Refractory epilepsy; Meta-analysis; TEMPORAL-LOBE EPILEPSY; HUMAN MOTOR CORTEX; NONINVASIVE BRAIN-STIMULATION; TDCS; MODEL; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2024.107456
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
An increasing number of research indicate that non-invasive neurostimulation techniques, like transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), can effectively control refractory epilepsy. While previous meta-analyses have primarily focused on randomized controlled trials (RCTs), this study expands the scope by including both RCTs and non-RCTs to provide a more comprehensive assessment of tDCS efficacy in treating refractory epilepsy. Through a systematic search of "PUBMED, Embase and Cochrane", we sought relevant studies related to the research topic. We utilized the Cochrane Collaboration tool to assess the risk of bias for the RCTs and the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) tool to evaluate the quality of the non-RCTs included in this meta-analysis. In addition, a protocol for this meta-analysis was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024496837 http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/ PROSPERO). A total of 14 studies, including 8 RCTs and 6 non-RCTs , involving 307 subjects with refractory epilepsy, were included in this meta-analysis. The combined analysis of RCTs and non-RCTs indicated that tDCS was effective in reducing seizure frequency (SF) in refractory epilepsy patients, with significant improvements observed both four weeks (MD = -4.54; p < 0.01; 95 % CI = -5.69 to -3.38) and eight weeks (MD = -3.49; p < 0.01; 95 % CI = -5.37 to -1.61) after stimulation. There were no statistically significant differences in Interictal Epileptiform Discharges (IEDs) shortly after stimulation (MD = -3.59; p = 0.42; 95 % CI = -12.33-5.16). However, a reduction was observed at four weeks (MD = -5.28; p < 0.01; 95 % CI = -6.88 to -3.68) and eight weeks post-stimulation (MD = -3.37; p < 0.01; 95 % CI = -5.35 to -1.40). The patient's adverse reactions were mild, and they could be relieved shortly after discontinuation of the stimulus. The quality of evidence across outcomes was assessed as moderate. The results indicate that tDCS demonstrates promising efficacy and safety in managing seizures in refractory epilepsy. While this meta-analysis provides valuable findings, additional large-scale randomized controlled trials are needed to further confirm the efficacy of tDCS for refractory epilepsy.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Metabolic Effects of Brown Adipose Tissue Activity Due to Cold Exposure in Humans: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of RCTs and Non-RCTs
    Tabei, Shirin
    Chamorro, Rodrigo
    Meyhoefer, Sebastian M.
    Wilms, Britta
    BIOMEDICINES, 2024, 12 (03)
  • [2] Transcranial direct current stimulation in the management of epilepsy: a meta-analysis and systematic review
    Chen, Yujie
    Ou, Zhujing
    Hao, Nanya
    Zhang, Hesheng
    Zhang, Enhui
    Zhou, Dong
    Wu, Xintong
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2024, 15
  • [3] Efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation on seizure control in patients with refractory epilepsy. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Hendi, N. I.
    AbuSammour, Y.
    Mohamed, A. S.
    Khaled, M.
    Amin, A. M.
    Fallaha, M. S.
    Kamel, B.
    Helmy, Y. N. A.
    Meshref, M.
    Ali, Mash
    EPILEPSIA, 2024, 65 : 356 - 356
  • [4] Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Schizophrenia: A Meta-Analysis
    Chen, Alexander
    Ashla, Mark
    McCarron, Matthew
    Wilson, Melissa
    Figueroa, Carlos
    Siegel, Steven
    Lee, Darrin
    BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2021, 89 (09) : S291 - S291
  • [5] A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Efficacy of Repeated Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Migraine
    Cai, Guoshuai
    Xia, Zhu
    Charvet, Leigh
    Xiao, Feifei
    Datta, Abhishek
    Androulakis, X. Michelle
    JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH, 2021, 14 : 1171 - 1183
  • [6] Transcranial direct current stimulation-efficacy in mild cognitive impairment: A meta-analysis
    Sandhya, G.
    Malo, Palash Kumar
    Issac, Thomas Gregor
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCES IN RURAL PRACTICE, 2024, 15 (02) : 194 - 202
  • [7] Efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation in patients with Parkinson's disease: A meta-analysis
    Azharuddin, Md
    Adil, Mohammad
    Ghosh, Pinaki
    Kapur, Prem
    Sharma, Manju
    INTERNATIONAL PSYCHOGERIATRICS, 2019, 31 : 107 - 108
  • [8] Transcranial direct current stimulation for ambulation in stroke - a meta-analysis
    Tien, H. -H.
    Liu, W. -Y.
    Wu, Y. -C.
    Lien, H. -Y.
    CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES, 2017, 43
  • [9] Efficacy and safety of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in treatment of refractory epilepsy: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized sham-controlled trials
    Hawas, Yousef
    Abbas, Abdallah
    Alkhawaldeh, Ibraheem M.
    Zeid, Mohamed Abo
    Al Azzawi, Mohammad Al Diab
    Alsalhi, Hamza Khaled
    Negida, Ahmed
    NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2025, 46 (02) : 671 - 687
  • [10] Efficacy of Prehabilitation in cancer patients: an Rcts systematic review with meta-analysis
    Gennuso, Daniele
    Baldelli, Angela
    Gigli, Loredana
    Ruotolo, Ilaria
    Galeoto, Giovanni
    Gaburri, Daniela
    Sellitto, Giovanni
    BMC CANCER, 2024, 24 (01)