Knowledge sharing through scenario development: Experiences of an interdisciplinary and international research project

被引:0
作者
Poessneck, Janine [1 ]
Kabisch, Sigrun [1 ]
Kowaltowski, Doris C. C. K. [2 ]
van Oel, Clarine J. [3 ]
Soliman-Junior, Joao [4 ]
Tzortzopoulos, Patricia [5 ]
Koolwijk, Jelle S. J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Helmholtz Ctr Environm Res, Dept Urban & Environm Sociol, Permoserstr 15, D-04318 Leipzig, Germany
[2] Univ Estadual Campinas, Sch Civil Engn Architecture & Urban Design, Campinas, Brazil
[3] Delft Univ Technol, Dept Management Built Environm, Delft, Netherlands
[4] Univ Salford, Sch Sci Engn & Environm, Salford, England
[5] Nottingham Trent Univ, Sch Architecture Design & Built Environm, Nottingham, England
基金
荷兰研究理事会; 英国经济与社会研究理事会; 巴西圣保罗研究基金会; 瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
Knowledge sharing; scenario development; communication; collaboration; interdisciplinary research; international project; INTEGRATION; REFLECTIONS; STATE;
D O I
10.1177/03080188241291828
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
This paper discusses knowledge sharing through scenario development as applied in the interdisciplinary and international research project uVITAL. It focused on user-oriented upgrading of the social housing stock. The aim was to gain deeper insights into the specificities and commonalities of the four country case studies involved. Two online workshops, which included various steps for scenario development, were particularly important during the COVID-19 pandemic when face-to-face exchanges were not possible. A Miro whiteboard was very useful as a technical communication and collaboration tool. This paper outlines the benefits and challenges of scenario development to facilitate communication and collaboration between researchers from different disciplines and national and cultural backgrounds, particularly in online and hybrid settings. The well-structured process of scenario development was an important step in the project, moving from passive to active knowledge sharing. This included issues of content, geographical and cultural diversity and methodological openness.
引用
收藏
页码:532 / 549
页数:18
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   A review of scenario planning [J].
Amer, Muhammad ;
Daim, Tugrul U. ;
Jetter, Antonie .
FUTURES, 2013, 46 :23-40
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2002, GLOBAL ENV OUTLOOK 3
[3]  
Awwal S., 2022, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, DOI 10.1088/1755-1315/1101/5/052020
[4]  
Bennett Elena., 2006, Bridging Scales and Knowledge Systems: Concepts and Applications in Ecosystem Assessment, P275
[5]   The current state of scenario development: an overview of techniques [J].
Bishop, Peter ;
Hines, Andy ;
Collins, Terry .
FORESIGHT, 2007, 9 (01) :5-+
[6]  
Bohensky E. L., 2011, J MARINE BIOL ARTICL, V2011, DOI [10.1155/2011/504651, DOI 10.1155/2011/504651]
[7]   Scenario types and techniques:: Towards a user's guide [J].
Borjeson, Lena ;
Hojer, Mattlas ;
Dreborg, Karl-Henrik ;
Ekvall, Tomas ;
Finnveden, Goran .
FUTURES, 2006, 38 (07) :723-739
[8]   The Practice of Scenario Planning: An Analysis of Inter- and Intra-organizational Strategizing [J].
Bowman, Gary .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2016, 27 (01) :77-96
[9]   The origins and evolution of scenario techniques in long range business planning [J].
Bradfield, R ;
Wright, G ;
Burt, G ;
Cairns, G ;
Van Der Heijden, K .
FUTURES, 2005, 37 (08) :795-812
[10]   The challenges of interdisciplinarity [J].
Brewer, GD .
POLICY SCIENCES, 1999, 32 (04) :327-337