Effectiveness of Dyadic Interventions on Quality of Life for Cancer Patients and Family Caregivers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials

被引:0
作者
Li, Linna [1 ]
Zhu, Chuanmei [2 ]
Yan, Qianwen [1 ]
Li, Juejin [1 ]
Chen, Yang [1 ]
Hu, Xiaolin [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, West China Sch Nursing, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Outpatient Dept, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[3] Tianfu Jincheng Lab, City Future Med, Chengdu, Peoples R China
关键词
cancer; cancer patients; dyadic interventions; family caregivers; meta-analysis; quality of life; randomised controlled trials; RECURRENT BREAST-CANCER; COUPLE-BASED INTERVENTION; PROSTATE-CANCER; INFORMATION NEEDS; PILOT; HEALTH; COMMUNICATION; PARTNERS; OUTCOMES; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1111/jocn.17700
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background: Increases in cancer survivorship negatively impact patients and family caregivers, decreasing quality of life. Previous dyadic interventions involved them as a unit and focused on their outcomes, but inconsistent results existed in influencing quality of life. Objectives: To assess dyadic intervention effect on quality of life for cancer patients and family caregivers across different cancer types and intervention durations. Design: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Methods: Six databases were searched from establishment until 14 January 2024. Two authors independently performed the search process, literature screening, and data extraction. The ROB version 2 and GRADE were respectively used to check the methodology and evidence quality. The data were analysed via RStudio, and intervention effects were estimated with 95% CIs and SMDs. The statistical heterogeneity was explored through the I2 statistic, P values, and Egger's test, and differences in overall effects were deemed statistically significant, having a P value < 0.05. Subgroup analysis was also conducted. Results: 13 RCTs with 1625 participants, published from 2005 to 2021, were included. The results demonstrated that dyadic interventions enhanced quality of life for both cancer patients and family caregivers. Subgroup analysis suggested that family-centred interventions for patients with specific cancer types, which lasted for a long period (> 6 weeks), enhanced quality of life for cancer patients and family caregivers. The evidence and methodology were of a moderate quality. Conclusions: Nurses are important practitioners of culture-oriented dyadic interventions. Long-term (> 6 weeks) and family-centred dyadic interventions for patients with a specific cancer type can enhance cancer patients' and family caregivers' quality of life, along with digital intelligence approaches to promote mutual communication and strengthen family relationships, thereby optimising oncology clinical nursing and enhancing the quality of life, health, and welfare of the entire family.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 116 条
[1]   Relationship between caring burden and quality of life in caregivers of cancer patients in Iran [J].
Abbasi, Ali ;
Mirhosseini, Seyedmohammad ;
Basirinezhad, Mohammad Hasan ;
Ebrahimi, Hossein .
SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2020, 28 (09) :4123-4129
[2]   Quality of life, care needs, and information needs among patients diagnosed with cancer during their treatment phase [J].
Abu Sharour, Loai ;
Malak, Malakah ;
Subih, Maha ;
Salameh, Ayman Bani .
PSYCHOLOGY HEALTH & MEDICINE, 2020, 25 (02) :252-258
[3]   Global surveillance of trends in cancer survival 2000-14 (CONCORD-3): analysis of individual records for 37 513 025 patients diagnosed with one of 18 cancers from 322 population-based registries in 71 countries [J].
Allemani, Claudia ;
Matsuda, Tomohiro ;
Di Carlo, Veronica ;
Harewood, Rhea ;
Matz, Melissa ;
Niksic, Maja ;
Bonaventure, Audrey ;
Valkov, Mikhail ;
Johnson, Christopher J. ;
Esteve, Jacques ;
Ogunbiyi, Olufemi J. ;
Azevedo e Silva, Gulnar ;
Chen, Wan-Qing ;
Eser, Sultan ;
Engholm, Gerda ;
Stiller, Charles A. ;
Monnereau, Alain ;
Woods, Ryan R. ;
Visser, Otto ;
Lim, Gek Hsiang ;
Aitken, Joanne ;
Weir, Hannah K. ;
Coleman, Michel P. .
LANCET, 2018, 391 (10125) :1023-1075
[4]   Revolutionizing healthcare: the role of artificial intelligence in clinical practice [J].
Alowais, Shuroug A. ;
Alghamdi, Sahar S. ;
Alsuhebany, Nada ;
Alqahtani, Tariq ;
Alshaya, Abdulrahman I. ;
Almohareb, Sumaya N. ;
Aldairem, Atheer ;
Alrashed, Mohammed ;
Bin Saleh, Khalid ;
Badreldin, Hisham A. ;
Al Yami, Majed S. ;
Al Harbi, Shmeylan ;
Albekairy, Abdulkareem M. .
BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2023, 23 (01)
[5]   Needs and preferences of breast cancer survivors regarding outcome-based shared decision-making about personalised post-treatment surveillance [J].
Ankersmid, Jet W. ;
Drossaert, Constance H. C. ;
van Riet, Yvonne E. A. ;
Strobbe, Luc J. A. ;
Siesling, Sabine .
JOURNAL OF CANCER SURVIVORSHIP, 2023, 17 (05) :1471-1479
[6]   Dyadic Interventions for Cancer Survivors and Caregivers: State of the Science and New Directions [J].
Badr, Hoda ;
Bakhshaie, Jafar ;
Chhabria, Karishma .
SEMINARS IN ONCOLOGY NURSING, 2019, 35 (04) :337-341
[7]   Home-based exercise improves quality of life in breast and prostate cancer survivors: A meta-analysis [J].
Bates-Fraser, Lauren C. ;
Riley, Sasha ;
Stopforth, Cameron ;
Moertl, Kaileigh ;
Edgar, Kyle ;
Stoner, Lee ;
Hanson, Erik D. .
PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (04)
[8]   A developmental-contextual model of couples coping with chronic illness across the adult life span [J].
Berg, Cynthia A. ;
Upchurch, Renn .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2007, 133 (06) :920-954
[9]   Addressing the needs of young breast cancer survivors at the 5 year milestone: Can a short-term, low intensity intervention produce change? [J].
Bloom J.R. ;
Stewart S.L. ;
D'Onofrio C.N. ;
Luce J. ;
Banks P.J. .
Journal of Cancer Survivorship, 2008, 2 (3) :190-204
[10]   Two Conceptualizations of Dyadic Coping and Their Potential for Predicting Relationship Quality and Individual Well-Being A Comparison [J].
Bodenmann, Guy ;
Meuwly, Nathalie ;
Kayser, Karen .
EUROPEAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2011, 16 (04) :255-266