Comparison of Four Different DNA Isolation Methods from MGIT Culture for Long-Read Whole Genome Sequencing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis

被引:0
作者
Arslan, Nazli [1 ]
Demiray-Gurbuz, Ebru [2 ]
Ozkutuk, Nuri [3 ]
Esen, Nuran [2 ]
Ozkutuk, Aye Aydan [2 ]
机构
[1] Dokuz Eylul Univ, Inst Hlth Sci, Dept Med Microbiol, Izmir, Turkiye
[2] Dokuz Eylul Univ, Fac Med, Dept Med Microbiol, Izmir, Turkiye
[3] Manisa Celal Bayar Univ, Fac Med, Dept Med Microbiol, Manisa, Turkiye
关键词
Mycobacterium tuberculosis; Whole Genome Sequencing; Next Generation Sequencing; Nanopore Sequencing; DNA; Isolation and Purification;
D O I
10.5812/jjm-148070
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Background: Tuberculosis (TB) remains a global health challenge, particularly due to drug resistance and limitations in rapiddiagnosis. Next-generation sequencing (NGS), especially long-read whole genome sequencing (WGS), shows promise for rapidlydetecting TB and drug resistance, but it requires high-quality DNA, which is difficult to extract from Mycobacterium tuberculosisdue to its complex cell wall. Objectives: This study evaluated four DNA isolation methods for extracting pure DNA from M. tuberculosis, aiming tostandardize protocols for long-read WGS. Methods:Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37RV colonies were grown in BACTEC MGIT liquid medium. Two pellets were prepared asthe initial material for the DNA extraction protocol: Pellets from 1 mL McFarland 2 suspensions and all growing colonies fromtwo MGIT liquid cultures. Four DNA extraction methods were used: The cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) method,GeneJET Genomic DNA Purification Kit, Quick-DNA Fecal/Soil Microbe Kit, and Genematrix Tissue/Bacterial DNA Purification Kit,with some modifications. DNA quality was assessed based on concentration, purity, and integrity. Results: Among the tested methods, the Quick-DNA Fecal/Soil Kit yielded approximately 85 ng/mL of DNA and a purity of 1.9 at260/280 nm from the colonial pellet of two MGIT tubes. However, lower intact DNA [DNA integrity number (DIN) similar to 6.8] wasobtained with this kit. The CTAB method provided the highest intact DNA (DIN similar to 9.5), although the purity of the DNA was notsufficient. Conclusions: Based on three repetitions of McF-2 and colonial pellet extractions, the Quick-DNA Fecal/Soil Kit yielded thehighest DNA quantity and purity but showed lower integrity compared to other methods, indicating the need for adjustments.A pellet from two MGIT cultures (similar to 100 mu L) is suitable for long-read WGS with this kit. However, a larger sample size is required togeneralize these findings. For effective long-read sequencing of M. tuberculosis, DNA extraction protocols must be optimized tobalance yield, fragment size, and purity for accurate sequencing and drug resistance analysis.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2023, Implementing the end TB strategy: the essentials, 2022 update Internet
  • [2] The Role of Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) in the Management of Tuberculosis: Practical Review for Implementation in Routine
    Beviere, Marion
    Reissier, Sophie
    Penven, Malo
    Dejoies, Loren
    Guerin, Francois
    Cattoir, Vincent
    Piau, Caroline
    [J]. PATHOGENS, 2023, 12 (08):
  • [3] Complete nontuberculous mycobacteria whole genomes using an optimized DNA extraction protocol for long-read sequencing
    Bouso, Jennifer M.
    Planet, Paul J.
    [J]. BMC GENOMICS, 2019, 20 (01) : 793
  • [4] Nanopore Sequencing for Mycobacterium tuberculosis: a Critical Review of the Literature, New Developments, and Future Opportunities
    Dippenaar, Anzaan
    Goossens, Sander N.
    Grobbelaar, Melanie
    Oostvogels, Selien
    Cuypers, Bart
    Laukens, Kris
    Meehan, Conor J.
    Warren, Robin M.
    van Rie, Annelies
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2022, 60 (01)
  • [5] Whole-genome sequencing and Mycobacterium tuberculosis: Challenges in sample preparation and sequencing data analysis
    Dohal, Matus
    Porvaznik, Igor
    Prso, Kristian
    Rasmussen, Erik Michael
    Solovic, Ivan
    Mokry, Juraj
    [J]. TUBERCULOSIS, 2020, 123
  • [6] Elton L, 2024, medRxiv, DOI [10.1101/2024.04.15.24305720, 10.1101/2024.04.15.24305720, DOI 10.1101/2024.04.15.24305720]
  • [7] A scalable, efficient, and safe method to prepare high quality DNA from mycobacteria and other challenging cells
    Epperson, L. Elaine
    Strong, Michael
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL TUBERCULOSIS AND OTHER MYCOBACTERIAL DISEASES, 2020, 19
  • [8] Jagatia H, 2021, METHODS MOL BIOL, V2314, P59, DOI 10.1007/978-1-0716-1460-0_2
  • [9] Accurate quantification of bacterial abundance in metagenomic DNAs accounting for variable DNA integrity levels
    Manzari, Caterina
    Oranger, Annarita
    Fosso, Bruno
    Piancone, Elisabetta
    Pesole, Graziano
    D'Erchia, Anna Maria
    [J]. MICROBIAL GENOMICS, 2020, 6 (10): : 1 - 10
  • [10] Whole genome sequencing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis: current standards and open issues
    Meehan, Conor J.
    Goig, Galo A.
    Kohl, Thomas A.
    Verboven, Lennert
    Dippenaar, Anzaan
    Ezewudo, Matthew
    Farhat, Maha R.
    Guthrie, Jennifer L.
    Laukens, Kris
    Miotto, Paolo
    Ofori-Anyinam, Boatema
    Dreyer, Viola
    Supply, Philip
    Suresh, Anita
    Utpatel, Christian
    van Soolingen, Dick
    Zhou, Yang
    Ashton, Philip M.
    Brites, Daniela
    Cabibbe, Andrea M.
    de Jong, Bouke C.
    de Vos, Margaretha
    Menardo, Fabrizio
    Gagneux, Sebastien
    Gao, Qian
    Heupink, Tim H.
    Liu, Qingyun
    Loiseau, Chloe
    Rigouts, Leen
    Rodwell, Timothy C.
    Tagliani, Elisa
    Walker, Timothy M.
    Warren, Robin M.
    Zhao, Yanlin
    Zignol, Matteo
    Schito, Marco
    Gardy, Jennifer
    Cirillo, Daniela M.
    Niemann, Stefan
    Comas, Inaki
    Van Rie, Annelies
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS MICROBIOLOGY, 2019, 17 (09) : 533 - 545