Legal consciousness and the crypto phenomenon: property ideologies, innovations and potential ramifications on financial system stability

被引:0
作者
Hung, Alvin Hoi-Chun [1 ]
机构
[1] Australian Natl Univ, Coll Law, Canberra, ACT, Australia
关键词
Property law; finance; crypto-assets; legal consciousness; innovation; Minsky; LAW; BLOCKCHAIN; CONSTRUCTION; PERCEPTIONS; SOVEREIGNTY; CRISIS; FUTURE; RIGHTS; POWER;
D O I
10.1017/S1744552324000338
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
How does the understanding of law among individuals involved in the crypto phenomenon originate, and how does it impact the trajectory of this innovation? This article examines the legal consciousness of crypto industry participants and state actors, exploring their ideologies on law, property and innovation through extensive document and archival research. It highlights the interplay between the crypto industry's perception of crypto-assets' possessing dynamic and self-regulating qualities beyond traditional legal boundaries and the increasing willingness of state actors, despite their reservations, to utilise law as a flexible tool to embrace innovation and promote economic competitiveness. By employing Minsky's financial instability hypothesis, this article contextualises such legal consciousness within the financial system and contends that collective legal consciousness and associated behavioural dynamics substantially shape state-industry interactions, with the potential to destabilise the financial system. This article sheds light on the challenges presented by crypto-assets and the intricate interplay between law and technological advancements.
引用
收藏
页码:598 / 616
页数:19
相关论文
共 140 条
[1]  
Acuiti, 2022, CRYPTO DERIVATIVES M
[2]  
Adler, 2010, ADM JUSTICE CONTEXT
[3]  
Agrawal H., 2023, 8 BEST CRYPTO MARGIN
[4]  
Aksoy P., 2023, LAW INNOVATION TECHN, V15, P1
[5]  
Allen Hilary J., 2023, WM. & MARY L. REV., V64, P919
[6]  
Allenby BR., 2011, GROWING GAP EMERGING
[7]  
Altschuler S., 2022, Stanford Journal of Blockchain Law Policy, V5, P92
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2021, MARK SHIN V ICON FDN
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2020, Securities and Exchange Commission
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2019, EWHC AA v. Persons Unknown