Generalization of peanut yield prediction models using artificial neural networks and vegetation indices

被引:0
|
作者
Souza, Jarlyson Brunno Costa [1 ]
de Almeida, Samira Luns Hatum [2 ]
de Oliveira, Mailson Freire [3 ]
Carreira, Vinicius dos Santos [1 ]
de Filho, Armando Lopes Brito [1 ]
dos Santos, Adao Felipe [4 ]
da Silva, Rouverson Pereira [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Estadual Paulista Julio Mesquita Filho JABOTI, Doutorando Agron, Via Acesso Prof Paulo Donato Castellane,km 5, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil
[2] Univ Estadual Paulista Julio Mesquita Filho JABOTI, Posdoutoranda Agron, Via Acesso Prof Paulo Donato Castellane km 5, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil
[3] Nebraska Extes Dodge Cty, Extens Educator, Fremont, NE USA
[4] Univ Fed Lavras, Lavras, MG, Brazil
[5] Univ Estadual Paulista Julio Mesquita Filho JABOTI, Via Acesso Prof Paulo Donato Castellane,km 5, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil
来源
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
Artificial Intelligence; Digital Agriculture; Vegetation Indices; Model Validation; Multilayer Perceptron; Radial Basis Function; MODIS; SPECTRA; ENERGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.atech.2025.100873
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
CONTEXT: The prediction of crop yield is vital for the management and decision-making processes in agriculture. Techniques such as Remote Sensing (RS) and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) emerge as potential tools for predicting these agronomic parameters. OBJECTIVE: Therefore, the objective of this study was to combine RS data in ANN models to remotely and anticipatively predict peanut yield. METHODS: The experiment was conducted in eleven commercial fields, divided into six fields in the 2020/21 season and five in the 2021/22 season. The input data for the development of the models were vegetation indices (EVI, GNDVI, MNLI, NLI, NDVI, SAVI, and SR) derived from high-resolution satellite images on five dates, from one to thirty days before the start of the peanut harvest. The Vegetation Index (VI) data from the 20/21 season were inserted into Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) and Radial Basis Function (RBF) Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) for the calibration. Subsequently, the generated equations were applied to the fields of the subsequent season for generalizing and recalibration of the models using the dataset from both seasons. Both networks proved capable of making predictions using the VIs as input, both in validation and recalibration, where an improvement in the precision and accuracy of the models was observed. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The validation of the models demonstrated a high potential for generalizing the variability of peanut yield in new fields. The MLP network presented the best results in this study, with an MAPE of 9.3 %, thirty days before harvest and a determination coefficient of 0.80. The VIs that stood out the most as input were EVI, SAVI, and SR. The use of RS combined with ANN is a powerful tool for predicting peanut yield and assisting the farmer in crop management. SIGNIFICANCE: Theresultsobtainedhighlighttheimportanceofdevelopingpredictivemodelsforpeanutyieldoverthe years, taking into accountthe interactionbetween genotypes and environments to enhancemodel robustness. Furthermore, it is essential that these models be applicable in new areas, as demonstrated by this work, which evidenced good generalizationacrossdistinctlocations, evenundervaryingmanagementpracticesandcultivars.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Prediction of spectral and luminosity classes from spectral indices with artificial neural networks
    Gulati, RK
    Altamirano, L
    ASTROPHYSICS AND SPACE SCIENCE, 2000, 273 (1-4) : 73 - 81
  • [42] Crop Yield Prediction Using Deep Neural Networks
    Khaki, Saeed
    Wang, Lizhi
    FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2019, 10
  • [43] Fruit yield prediction of pepper using artificial neural network
    Gholipoor, Manoochehr
    Nadali, Fathollah
    SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE, 2019, 250 : 249 - 253
  • [44] Seed yield prediction of sesame using artificial neural network
    Emamgholizadeh, Samad
    Parsaeian, M.
    Baradaran, Mehdi
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2015, 68 : 89 - 96
  • [45] Representations and generalization in artificial and brain neural networks
    Li, Qianyi
    Sorscher, Ben
    Sompolinsky, Haim
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2024, 121 (27)
  • [46] Prediction of hydrocyclone performance using artificial neural networks
    Karimi, M.
    Dehghani, A.
    Nezamalhosseini, A.
    Talebi, Sh
    JOURNAL OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN INSTITUTE OF MINING AND METALLURGY, 2010, 110 (05): : 207 - 212
  • [47] Stability Prediction of ΔΣ Modulators using Artificial Neural Networks
    Kaesser, Paul
    Kaltenstadler, Sebastian
    Conrad, Joschua
    Wagner, Johannes
    Ismail, Omar
    Ortmanns, Maurits
    2024 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS, ISCAS 2024, 2024,
  • [48] Prediction of Sediment Concentration Using Artificial Neural Networks
    Dogan, Emrah
    TEKNIK DERGI, 2009, 20 (01): : 4567 - 4582
  • [49] Time series prediction using artificial neural networks
    Pérez-Chavarríia, MA
    Hidalgo-Silva, HH
    Ocampo-Torres, FJ
    CIENCIAS MARINAS, 2002, 28 (01) : 67 - 77
  • [50] Water Quality Evaluation and Prediction Using Irrigation Indices, Artificial Neural Networks, and Partial Least Square Regression Models for the Nile River, Egypt
    Gad, Mohamed
    Saleh, Ali H.
    Hussein, Hend
    Elsayed, Salah
    Farouk, Mohamed
    WATER, 2023, 15 (12)