Generalization of peanut yield prediction models using artificial neural networks and vegetation indices

被引:0
|
作者
Souza, Jarlyson Brunno Costa [1 ]
de Almeida, Samira Luns Hatum [2 ]
de Oliveira, Mailson Freire [3 ]
Carreira, Vinicius dos Santos [1 ]
de Filho, Armando Lopes Brito [1 ]
dos Santos, Adao Felipe [4 ]
da Silva, Rouverson Pereira [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Estadual Paulista Julio Mesquita Filho JABOTI, Doutorando Agron, Via Acesso Prof Paulo Donato Castellane,km 5, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil
[2] Univ Estadual Paulista Julio Mesquita Filho JABOTI, Posdoutoranda Agron, Via Acesso Prof Paulo Donato Castellane km 5, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil
[3] Nebraska Extes Dodge Cty, Extens Educator, Fremont, NE USA
[4] Univ Fed Lavras, Lavras, MG, Brazil
[5] Univ Estadual Paulista Julio Mesquita Filho JABOTI, Via Acesso Prof Paulo Donato Castellane,km 5, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil
来源
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
Artificial Intelligence; Digital Agriculture; Vegetation Indices; Model Validation; Multilayer Perceptron; Radial Basis Function; MODIS; SPECTRA; ENERGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.atech.2025.100873
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
CONTEXT: The prediction of crop yield is vital for the management and decision-making processes in agriculture. Techniques such as Remote Sensing (RS) and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) emerge as potential tools for predicting these agronomic parameters. OBJECTIVE: Therefore, the objective of this study was to combine RS data in ANN models to remotely and anticipatively predict peanut yield. METHODS: The experiment was conducted in eleven commercial fields, divided into six fields in the 2020/21 season and five in the 2021/22 season. The input data for the development of the models were vegetation indices (EVI, GNDVI, MNLI, NLI, NDVI, SAVI, and SR) derived from high-resolution satellite images on five dates, from one to thirty days before the start of the peanut harvest. The Vegetation Index (VI) data from the 20/21 season were inserted into Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) and Radial Basis Function (RBF) Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) for the calibration. Subsequently, the generated equations were applied to the fields of the subsequent season for generalizing and recalibration of the models using the dataset from both seasons. Both networks proved capable of making predictions using the VIs as input, both in validation and recalibration, where an improvement in the precision and accuracy of the models was observed. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The validation of the models demonstrated a high potential for generalizing the variability of peanut yield in new fields. The MLP network presented the best results in this study, with an MAPE of 9.3 %, thirty days before harvest and a determination coefficient of 0.80. The VIs that stood out the most as input were EVI, SAVI, and SR. The use of RS combined with ANN is a powerful tool for predicting peanut yield and assisting the farmer in crop management. SIGNIFICANCE: Theresultsobtainedhighlighttheimportanceofdevelopingpredictivemodelsforpeanutyieldoverthe years, taking into accountthe interactionbetween genotypes and environments to enhancemodel robustness. Furthermore, it is essential that these models be applicable in new areas, as demonstrated by this work, which evidenced good generalizationacrossdistinctlocations, evenundervaryingmanagementpracticesandcultivars.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Yield prediction of wheat in south-east region of Turkey by using artificial neural networks
    Cakir, Yuksel
    Kirci, Murvet
    Gunes, Ece Olcay
    THIRD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AGRO-GEOINFORMATICS (AGRO-GEOINFORMATICS 2014), 2014, : 212 - 215
  • [32] Prediction of Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Seeds Yield Using Artificial Neural Networks
    Hara, Patryk
    Piekutowska, Magdalena
    Niedbala, Gniewko
    AGRICULTURE-BASEL, 2023, 13 (03):
  • [33] Rainfall-runoff models using artificial neural networks for ensemble streamflow prediction
    Jeong, DI
    Kim, YO
    HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2005, 19 (19) : 3819 - 3835
  • [34] Prediction of In vitro organogenesis of Bacopa monnieri using artificial neural networks and regression models
    Viswanathan, Pavitra
    Gosukonda, Jaabili S.
    Sherman, Samantha H.
    Joshee, Nirmal
    Gosukonda, Ramana M.
    HELIYON, 2022, 8 (12)
  • [35] Building Robust Prediction Models for Defective Sensor Data Using Artificial Neural Networks
    de Sa, Claudio Rebelo
    Shekar, Arvind Kumar
    Ferreira, Hugo
    Soares, Carlos
    14TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFT COMPUTING MODELS IN INDUSTRIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL APPLICATIONS (SOCO 2019), 2020, 950 : 142 - 153
  • [36] Prediction of HPLC Retention Index Using Artificial Neural Networks and IGroup E-State Indices
    Albaugh, Daniel R.
    Hall, L. Mark
    Hill, Dennis W.
    Kertesz, Tzipporah M.
    Parham, Marc
    Hall, Lowell H.
    Grant, David F.
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING, 2009, 49 (04) : 788 - 799
  • [37] Prediction of Loan Redemption: Logit Models and Artificial Neural Networks
    Dorota Witkowska
    Mariola Chrzanowska
    International Advances in Economic Research, 2005, 11 (3) : 343 - 343
  • [38] Artificial Neural Networks for Surface Ozone Prediction: Models and Analysis
    Faris, Hossam
    Alkasassbeh, Mouhammd
    Rodan, Ali
    POLISH JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, 2014, 23 (02): : 341 - 348
  • [39] Crop Yield Forecasting Using Artificial Neural Networks: A Comparison between Spatial and Temporal Models
    Guo, William W.
    Xue, Heru
    MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING, 2014, 2014
  • [40] Prediction of Spectral and Luminosity Classes from Spectral Indices with Artificial Neural Networks
    R.K. Gulati
    L. Altamirano
    Astrophysics and Space Science, 2000, 273 : 73 - 81