Comparison on Thermal Runaway and Critical Characteristics of Cylindrical Lithium-Ion Batteries: A Review

被引:0
|
作者
Li, Wei [1 ]
Wang, Jiasheng [2 ,3 ]
Sun, Chunfeng [2 ,3 ]
Fan, Xiaoping [2 ,3 ]
Gong, Lingzhu [1 ]
Huang, Jiale [5 ]
Wu, Jian-heng [4 ]
Yu, Gending [1 ]
Chen, Rongguo [1 ]
Li, Jingling [1 ]
Duh, Yih-Shing [1 ,2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Fujian Univ Technol, Coll Ecol Environm & Urban Construct, Fuzhou Green Chem & Cleaner Prod Ind Technol Innov, Fuzhou 350108, Fujian, Peoples R China
[2] North China Inst Sci & Technol, Sch Chem Safety, Langfang 065201, Hebei, Peoples R China
[3] North China Inst Sci & Technol, Hebei Key Lab Hazardous Chem Safety & Control Tech, Langfang 065201, Hebei, Peoples R China
[4] Fujian Funeng Longa`n Thermal Power Co Ltd, Fuding 355208, Peoples R China
[5] Xiamen Univ, Gulei Innovat Inst, React Hazards Evaluat Lab, Zhangzhou 363105, Peoples R China
关键词
lithium-ion battery; criticality; thermal runaway; electric vehicle; adiabatic calorimetry; internalshort circuit; INTERNAL SHORT-CIRCUIT; ACCELERATING RATE CALORIMETRY; INDUCED FAILURE; CATHODE MATERIALS; ABUSE; STATE; BEHAVIOR; IMPACT; CELLS; HEAT;
D O I
10.1021/acs.chas.4c00121
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
The thermal hazard results of commercial cylindrical lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) of different sizes from international laboratories are reviewed and discussed. The four types discussed encompass 14500, 18650, 21700, and 26650 ones. Characteristic data from the calorimeter include onset temperature, critical temperature, maximum temperature, maximum self-heat rate, enthalpy change, and quantity of noncondensable gases. By integrating thermal hazard data, a box-plot was established and hazard ranking was clearly evaluated as 21700 > 18650 non-LiFePO4 (LFP) >> 26650 LFP > 14500 non-LFP > 18650 LFP > 14500 LFP. Among all types of cylindrical lithium-ion batteries, the 21700 exhibits the worst consequence, which is attributed to the adoption of high energy density LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2 (NCA) and LiNixMnyCozO2 (NMC) cathode materials. It was found that the critical temperature T-cr and maximum temperature broadly scattered; besides, most of the maximum self-heat rate (dT/dt) and pressure data were absent in literature. Definitions of onset temperature, critical temperature, trigger temperature, and possible heat sources to stimulate the severe thermal runaway were collected and found to be unimaginably divergent. A thermal analysis database was established to classify critical temperatures into high T-cr (above 180 degrees C), low T-cr (130-180 degrees C), and no T-cr. The low T-cr inducement is speculated to be caused by gas shock or electron breakdown after the separator melted, while the intrinsic characteristics of T-cr require further investigation. Thermal runaway features of cylindrical LIBs can be concisely classified as lowest T-onset of 88.0 degrees C (21700 NMC) vs highest T-onset of 220.0 degrees C (18650 LFP), highest (dT/dt)(max) of 64536.0 degrees C min(-1) (21700 NCA) vs lowest (dT/dt)(max) of 3.0 degrees C min(-1) (18650 LFP), highest T-max of 1257.9 degrees C (21700 NCA) vs lowest T-max of 243.2 degrees C (18650 LFP), highest Delta n of 314.0 mmol (18650 NCA) vs lowest Delta n of 23.3 mmol (14500 LFP), lowest T-cr of 145.5 degrees C (21700 NCA) vs (no T-cr) (14500 and 18650 LFP), and highest Delta H of 70.5 kJ (21700 NCA) vs lowest Delta H of 0.8 kJ (14500 LFP). In this work, the present research is reviewed in detail and future perspectives are proposed. This review on the critical characteristics of cylindrical batteries under thermal failure and thermal abuse provides a reference for solving intrinsic safety issues for lithium-ion batteries of the next generation.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Experimental study on the characteristics of thermal runaway propagation process of cylindrical lithium-ion batteries
    Ke, Wei
    Zhang, Yanlin
    Zhou, Bo
    Wu, Chengyi
    Liu, Yan
    Xu, Min
    ENERGY SOURCES PART A-RECOVERY UTILIZATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS, 2024, 46 (01) : 11379 - 11394
  • [2] Seawater submersion for cylindrical lithium-ion batteries thermal runaway prevention
    Meelapchotipong, Pongkorn
    Charoenphonphanich, Chinda
    Masomtob, Manop
    Kunanusont, Nattanai
    JOURNAL OF ENERGY STORAGE, 2024, 99
  • [3] Review on Thermal Runaway of Lithium-Ion Batteries for Electric Vehicles
    Liubin Song
    Youhang Zheng
    Zhongliang Xiao
    Cheng Wang
    Tianyuan Long
    Journal of Electronic Materials, 2022, 51 : 30 - 46
  • [4] Review on Thermal Runaway of Lithium-Ion Batteries for Electric Vehicles
    Song, Liubin
    Zheng, Youhang
    Xiao, Zhongliang
    Wang, Cheng
    Long, Tianyuan
    JOURNAL OF ELECTRONIC MATERIALS, 2022, 51 (01) : 30 - 46
  • [5] A review on thermal runaway warning technology for lithium-ion batteries
    Hu, Dunan
    Huang, Sheng
    Wen, Zhen
    Gu, Xiuquan
    Lu, Jianguo
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2024, 206
  • [6] Review of polymers in the prevention of thermal runaway in lithium-ion batteries
    Allen, Jonathan
    ENERGY REPORTS, 2020, 6 : 217 - 224
  • [7] Towards a safer lithium-ion batteries: A critical review on cause, characteristics, warning and disposal strategy for thermal runaway
    Yang, Yu
    Wang, Renjie
    Shen, Zhaojie
    Yu, Quanqing
    Xiong, Rui
    Shen, Weixiang
    ADVANCES IN APPLIED ENERGY, 2023, 11
  • [8] Characteristics of particle emissions from lithium-ion batteries during thermal runaway: A review
    Li, Weifeng
    Xue, Yao
    Feng, Xinbo
    Rao, Shun
    Zhang, Tianyao
    Gao, Zhenhai
    Guo, Yueming
    Zhou, Haoyu
    Zhao, Haoyuan
    Song, Zelai
    Shi, Jiawei
    Wang, Hewu
    Wang, Deping
    JOURNAL OF ENERGY STORAGE, 2024, 78
  • [9] Insights into Thermal Runaway of Cylindrical Lithium-ion Batteries by Internal Temperature Sensors
    Feinauer, Max
    Holzle, Markus
    Waldmann, Thomas
    ELECTROCHEMICAL SOCIETY INTERFACE, 2024, 33 (03): : 51 - 54
  • [10] Mitigating Thermal Runaway of Lithium-Ion Batteries
    Feng, Xuning
    Ren, Dongsheng
    He, Xiangming
    Ouyang, Minggao
    JOULE, 2020, 4 (04) : 743 - 770