Limitations of 18S rDNA Sequence in Species-Level Classification of Dictyostelids

被引:0
|
作者
Chittavichai, Thanyaporn [1 ]
Sathitnaitham, Sukhita [1 ]
Utthiya, Supanut [1 ]
Prompichai, Wanasilp [1 ]
Prommarit, Kamonchat [1 ]
Vuttipongchaikij, Supachai [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wonnapinij, Passorn [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Kasetsart Univ, Fac Sci, Dept Genet, Bangkok 10900, Thailand
[2] Kasetsart Univ, Ctr Adv Studies Trop Nat Resources, Bangkok 10900, Thailand
[3] Kasetsart Univ, Omics Ctr Agr Bioresources Food & Hlth, Bangkok 10900, Thailand
关键词
delimitation; dictyostelids; DNA marker; species; SSU; DIVERSITY; EVOLUTION; DNA;
D O I
10.3390/microorganisms13020275
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Dictyostelid species classification has traditionally relied on morphology, a time-intensive method requiring expert knowledge. This study evaluated the potential and limitations of using the 18S rDNA sequence for species-level classification. 18S rDNA sequences of 16 samples from the Dicty stock center, including 14 samples found in Thailand, were analyzed. Signature sequence analyses confirmed genus-level identification with high accuracy. These sequences were analyzed alongside 309 database entries retrieved from the GenBank database. The analyses confirmed genus-level identification accuracy but highlighted challenges in distinguishing species due to overlapping intraspecific and interspecific variations, negative barcoding gaps, and incorrectly grouped samples to putative taxa by species delimitation analyses. Species delimitation methods, including maximum likelihood (ML) phylogenetic analysis, achieved limited success, with ML showing the highest accuracy but not exceeding 50%. However, species with high barcoding gaps, such as Raperostelium and Rostrostelium, demonstrated potential for accurate classification. These findings support using 18S rDNA for genus-level identification and suggest its possible application for certain species. Expanded sampling is needed to improve species-level classification and to identify more robust DNA markers for dictyostelid diversity studies.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Isolation and identification by 18S rDNA sequence of high lipid potential microalgal species for fuel production in Hainan Dao
    Zhang, Sen
    Liu, Ping-huai
    Yang, Xun
    Hao, Zong-di
    Zhang, Ling
    Luo, Ning
    Shi, Jie
    BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2014, 66 : 197 - 203
  • [32] Phylogeny of Halosarpheia based on 18S rDNA
    Anderson, JL
    Chen, W
    Shearer, CA
    MYCOLOGIA, 2001, 93 (05) : 897 - 906
  • [33] 18S rDNA phylogeny of Clitellata (Annelida)
    Erséus, C
    Källersjö, M
    ZOOLOGICA SCRIPTA, 2004, 33 (02) : 187 - 196
  • [34] 18S RDNA FROM LOPHOPHORATES - RESPONSE
    HALANYCH, KM
    BACHELLER, JD
    AGUINALDO, AMA
    LIVA, SM
    HILLIS, DM
    LAKE, JA
    SCIENCE, 1995, 270 (5243) : 1852 - 1852
  • [35] 18S rDNA phylogeny of oligochaetous Clitellata
    Erséus, C
    Källersjö, M
    CLADISTICS-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE WILLI HENNIG SOCIETY, 2004, 20 (01): : 82 - 82
  • [36] Phylogenetic position of the Golenkiniaceae (Chlorophyta) as inferred from 18S rDNA sequence data
    Wolf, M
    Hegewald, E
    Hepperle, D
    Krienitz, L
    BIOLOGIA, 2003, 58 (04) : 433 - 436
  • [37] NUCLEOTIDE-SEQUENCE OF THE 18S RDNA FROM THE MICROALGA NANOCHLORUM-EUCARYOTUM
    SARGENT, M
    ZAHN, R
    WALTERS, B
    GUPTA, R
    KAINE, B
    NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 1988, 16 (09) : 4156 - 4156
  • [38] Identification of synapomorphic characters in the genus Sarcocystis based on 18S rDNA sequence comparison
    Jeffries, AC
    Schnitzler, B
    Heydorn, AO
    Johnson, AM
    Tenter, AM
    JOURNAL OF EUKARYOTIC MICROBIOLOGY, 1997, 44 (05) : 388 - 392
  • [39] Phylogenetic position of Ibla (Cirripedia: Thoracica) based on 18S rDNA sequence analysis
    Mizrahi, L
    Achituv, Y
    Katcoff, DJ
    Perl-Treves, R
    JOURNAL OF CRUSTACEAN BIOLOGY, 1998, 18 (02) : 363 - 368
  • [40] EFFECTS OF SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT ON THE PHYLOGENY OF SARCOCYSTIS DEDUCED FROM 18S RDNA SEQUENCES
    ELLIS, J
    MORRISON, D
    PARASITOLOGY RESEARCH, 1995, 81 (08): : 696 - 699