Limitations of 18S rDNA Sequence in Species-Level Classification of Dictyostelids

被引:0
|
作者
Chittavichai, Thanyaporn [1 ]
Sathitnaitham, Sukhita [1 ]
Utthiya, Supanut [1 ]
Prompichai, Wanasilp [1 ]
Prommarit, Kamonchat [1 ]
Vuttipongchaikij, Supachai [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wonnapinij, Passorn [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Kasetsart Univ, Fac Sci, Dept Genet, Bangkok 10900, Thailand
[2] Kasetsart Univ, Ctr Adv Studies Trop Nat Resources, Bangkok 10900, Thailand
[3] Kasetsart Univ, Omics Ctr Agr Bioresources Food & Hlth, Bangkok 10900, Thailand
关键词
delimitation; dictyostelids; DNA marker; species; SSU; DIVERSITY; EVOLUTION; DNA;
D O I
10.3390/microorganisms13020275
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Dictyostelid species classification has traditionally relied on morphology, a time-intensive method requiring expert knowledge. This study evaluated the potential and limitations of using the 18S rDNA sequence for species-level classification. 18S rDNA sequences of 16 samples from the Dicty stock center, including 14 samples found in Thailand, were analyzed. Signature sequence analyses confirmed genus-level identification with high accuracy. These sequences were analyzed alongside 309 database entries retrieved from the GenBank database. The analyses confirmed genus-level identification accuracy but highlighted challenges in distinguishing species due to overlapping intraspecific and interspecific variations, negative barcoding gaps, and incorrectly grouped samples to putative taxa by species delimitation analyses. Species delimitation methods, including maximum likelihood (ML) phylogenetic analysis, achieved limited success, with ML showing the highest accuracy but not exceeding 50%. However, species with high barcoding gaps, such as Raperostelium and Rostrostelium, demonstrated potential for accurate classification. These findings support using 18S rDNA for genus-level identification and suggest its possible application for certain species. Expanded sampling is needed to improve species-level classification and to identify more robust DNA markers for dictyostelid diversity studies.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] NUCLEAR 18S rDNA AS A SPECIES-LEVEL MOLECULAR MARKER FOR LEUCOTHOIDAE (AMPHIPODA)
    White, Kristine N.
    JOURNAL OF CRUSTACEAN BIOLOGY, 2011, 31 (04) : 710 - 716
  • [2] An 18S rDNA Perspective on the Classification of Criconematoidea
    Powers, Thomas
    Harris, Timothy
    Higgins, Rebecca
    Mullin, Peter
    Powers, Kirsten
    JOURNAL OF NEMATOLOGY, 2017, 49 (03) : 236 - 244
  • [3] Phylogenetic diversity of 18S rDNA sequences of dictyostelids from Amnat Charoen Province, Thailand
    Rukseree, K.
    Wonganun, K.
    Palittapongarnpim, P.
    Ajawatanawong, P.
    MYCOSPHERE, 2018, 9 (02) : 202 - 214
  • [4] Phylogenetic relationships of Bulgaria inferred by 18S rDNA sequence analysis
    Doring, H
    Triebel, D
    CRYPTOGAMIE BRYOLOGIE LICHENOLOGIE, 1998, 19 (2-3): : 123 - 136
  • [5] SEQUENCE OF 18S RDNA OF ACTINORHIZAL ALNUS-GLUTINOSA (BETULACEAE)
    SAVARD, L
    LALONDE, M
    PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1991, 16 (04) : 725 - 728
  • [6] Primary species recognition and phylogeny of Chondrus (Gigartinales, Rhodophyta) using 18S rDNA sequence data
    胡自民
    曾晓起
    ALAN T. Critchley
    STEVE L. Morrell
    段德麟
    ChineseJournalofOceanologyandLimnology, 2007, (02) : 174 - 183
  • [7] Primary species recognition and phylogeny of Chondrus (Gigartinales, Rhodophyta) using 18S rDNA sequence data
    Hu Z.
    Zena X.
    Critchley A.T.
    Morrell S.L.
    Duan D.
    Chinese Journal of Oceanology and Limnology, 2007, 25 (2): : 174 - 183
  • [8] What can 18S rDNA do for copepod phylogeny and classification?
    Huys, R.
    Llewellyn-Hughes, J.
    INTEGRATIVE AND COMPARATIVE BIOLOGY, 2009, 49 : E82 - E82
  • [9] Identification of a potential fungal species by 18S rDNA for ligninases production
    Ferhan, M.
    Santos, S. N.
    Melo, I. S.
    Yan, N.
    Sain, M.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY & BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2013, 29 (12): : 2437 - 2440
  • [10] 18S rDNA from lophophorates
    1852, American Assoc for the Advancement of Science, Washington, DC, USA (270):