Current trends in global quantum metrology

被引:0
|
作者
Mukhopadhyay, Chiranjib [1 ,2 ]
Montenegro, Victor [1 ,2 ]
Bayat, Abolfazl [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Elect Sci & Technol China, Inst Fundamental & Frontier Sci, Chengdu 611731, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Elect Sci & Technol China, Key Lab Quantum Phys & Photon Quantum Informat, Minist Educ, Chengdu 611731, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
quantum sensing; quantum metrology; global sensing; Bayesian global sensing; frequentist global sensing; STATES;
D O I
10.1088/1751-8121/adb112
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
Quantum sensors are now universally acknowledged as one of the most promising near-term quantum technologies. The traditional formulation of quantum sensing introduces a concrete bound on ultimate precision through the so-called local sensing framework, in which a significant knowledge of prior information about the unknown parameter value is implicitly assumed. Moreover, the framework provides a systematic approach for optimizing the sensing protocol. In contrast, the paradigm of global sensing aims to find a precision bound for parameter estimation in the absence of such prior information. In recent years, vigorous research has been pursued to describe the contours of global quantum estimation. Here, we review some of these emerging developments. These developments are both in the realm of finding ultimate precision bounds with respect to appropriate figures of merit in the global sensing paradigm, as well as in the search for algorithms that achieve these bounds. We categorize these developments into two largely mutually exclusive camps; one employing Bayesian updating and the other seeking to generalize the frequentist picture of local sensing towards the global paradigm. In the first approach, in order to achieve the best performance, one has to optimize the measurement settings adaptively. In the second approach, the measurement setting is fixed, however the challenge is to identify this fixed measurement optimally.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] QUANTUM METROLOGY WITHOUT QUANTUM ENTANGLEMENT
    Datta, Animesh
    Shaji, Anil
    MODERN PHYSICS LETTERS B, 2012, 26 (18):
  • [2] Flexible resources for quantum metrology
    Friis, Nicolai
    Orsucci, Davide
    Skotiniotis, Michalis
    Sekatski, Pavel
    Dunjko, Vedran
    Briegel, Hans J.
    Duer, Wolfgang
    NEW JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 2017, 19
  • [3] Quantum metrology from a quantum information science perspective
    Toth, Geza
    Apellaniz, Iagoba
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICS A-MATHEMATICAL AND THEORETICAL, 2014, 47 (42)
  • [4] True precision limits in quantum metrology
    Jarzyna, Marcin
    Demkowicz-Dobrzanski, Rafal
    NEW JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 2015, 17
  • [5] Variational-state quantum metrology
    Koczor, Balint
    Endo, Suguru
    Jones, Tyson
    Matsuzaki, Yuichiro
    Benjamin, Simon C.
    NEW JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 2020, 22 (08)
  • [6] Quantum metrology in local dissipative environments
    Wang, Yuan-Sheng
    Chen, Chong
    An, Jun-Hong
    NEW JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 2017, 19
  • [7] Progress in Photonics Quantum Metrology (Invited)
    Ben, Wang
    Lijian, Zhang
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF LASERS-ZHONGGUO JIGUANG, 2024, 51 (01):
  • [8] Quantum Metrology in the Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum Era
    Jiao, Lin
    Wu, Wei
    Bai, Si-Yuan
    An, Jun-Hong
    ADVANCED QUANTUM TECHNOLOGIES, 2023,
  • [9] Quantum metrology using quantum combs and tensor network formalism
    Kurdzialek, Stanislaw
    Dulian, Piotr
    Majsak, Joanna
    Chakraborty, Sagnik
    Demkowicz-Dobrzanski, Rafal
    NEW JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 2025, 27 (01):
  • [10] Metrology for Quantum Communication
    Piacentini, F.
    Adenier, G.
    Traina, P.
    Avella, A.
    Brida, G.
    Degiovanni, I. P.
    Gramegna, M.
    Berchera, I. Ruo
    Genovese, M.
    2015 IEEE GLOBECOM WORKSHOPS (GC WKSHPS), 2015,