A study of the governance of knowledge sharing in open-source communities

被引:0
|
作者
Yi, Chaonan [1 ]
Ma, Lei [2 ]
Liu, Zheng [3 ]
Zhu, Junlin [1 ]
Zhu, Baoqing [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Intellectual Property, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Univ Sci & Technol, Ctr Innovat & Dev, Sch Publ Affairs, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Greenwich, Greenwich Business Sch, London, England
基金
中国国家社会科学基金;
关键词
Knowledge sharing; Open source; Open-source community; Community governance; OPEN-SOURCE SOFTWARE; OPEN INNOVATION; PERFORMANCE; USER; ORGANIZATIONS; PROPRIETARY; MOTIVATIONS; PERSPECTIVE; CONTRIBUTE; EMERGENCE;
D O I
10.1108/EJIM-08-2024-0953
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
PurposeOpen-source communities are platforms that promote knowledge sharing. The mitigation of open-source risks is crucial to these communities. Therefore, this article explores the governance mechanisms of knowledge sharing in open-source communities.Design/methodology/approachTo answer the core research question - "What are the governance mechanisms of knowledge sharing in open-source communities?" - we conducted an in-depth case study analysis of two open-source communities based in China.FindingsTwo types of open-source communities were found: technology-driven communities and enterprise ecosystem-oriented communities. Hence, their governance mechanisms differed. For the former type, it was important to integrate social and commercial value to encourage knowledge exchange and enhance business scenarios through community-user experience. For the latter type, mutual collaboration and knowledge sharing could be fostered through differentiated layouts and the distributed collaboration of developers around data-driven innovation scenarios. This required the integration of individual and ecosystem value through value exchange.Originality/valueThis study advances our understanding of the coordinated development between founding firms and digital technology-based open-source communities. The findings offer important guidance to business practitioners seeking to manage knowledge-sharing activities during digital transformations.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Open-Source Hinduism
    Siddhartha
    RELIGION AND THE ARTS, 2008, 12 (1-3) : 34 - 41
  • [42] Financing A Free-for-All: Crowdfunding Open-Source Software
    Bort, James
    Meoli, Azzurra
    Sullivan, David W.
    SMALL BUSINESS ECONOMICS, 2024, 63 (04) : 1449 - 1469
  • [43] Open-Source Colorimeter
    Anzalone, Gerald C.
    Glover, Alexandra G.
    Pearce, Joshua M.
    SENSORS, 2013, 13 (04): : 5338 - 5346
  • [44] Understanding knowledge sharing activities in free/open source software projects: An empirical study
    Sowe, Sulayman K.
    Stamelos, Ioannis
    Angelis, Lefteris
    JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE, 2008, 81 (03) : 431 - 446
  • [45] Making the Tools to Do-It-Together: Open-source Compression Screw Manufacturing Case Study
    Franz, Jacob A.
    Pearce, Joshua M.
    JOURNAL OF INNOVATION ECONOMICS & MANAGEMENT, 2023, (40): : 109 - 135
  • [46] Synergy of Patent and Open-Source-Driven Sustainable Climate Governance under Green AI: A Case Study of TinyML
    Li, Tao
    Luo, Jianqiang
    Liang, Kaitong
    Yi, Chaonan
    Ma, Lei
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (18)
  • [47] Accelerating social science knowledge production with the coordinated open-source model
    Konrad Turek
    Quality & Quantity, 2025, 59 (Suppl 2) : 767 - 795
  • [48] Knowledge collaboration between organizations and online communities: the role of open innovation intermediaries
    Randhawa, Krithika
    Josserand, Emmanuel
    Schweitzer, Jochen
    Logue, Danielle
    JOURNAL OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, 2017, 21 (06) : 1293 - 1318
  • [49] oneAPI Open-Source Math Library Interface
    Krainiuk, Mariia
    Goli, Mehdi
    Pascuzzi, Vincent R.
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2021 INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON PERFORMANCE, PORTABILITY & PRODUCTIVITY IN HPC (P3HPC 2021), 2021, : 22 - 32
  • [50] Collaboration in the Open-source Arena: The WebKit Case
    Teixeira, Jose
    Lin, Tingting
    SIGMIS-CPR'14: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2014 CONFERENCE ON COMPUTERS AND PEOPLE RESEARCH, 2014, : 121 - 129