Public sector digitalisation: not all positive impacts for knowledge assets

被引:0
作者
Garlatti, Andrea [1 ]
Fedele, Paolo [1 ]
Iacuzzi, Silvia [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Udine, Dept Econ & Stat, Via Tomadini 30A, I-33100 Udine, Italy
关键词
Knowledge management; intellectual capital; local government; public administration; administrative burden; ICT; ADMINISTRATIVE BURDEN; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1080/14778238.2025.2478050
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
Digitalisation can enhance knowledge assets within public administrations, thereby fostering value creation. Yet, it also poses risks such as inefficiencies, hidden costs, and value destruction, which can have negative impacts on human, structural, and relational capital. Despite their significance, these phenomena have received limited attention in the literature, leaving substantial research gaps concerning the impact of digital transformation on public employees, administrative procedures, and other knowledge assets. This paper explores the learning, compliance, and psychological costs arising from the recent digitalisation of a social service in the Friuli Venezia Giulia Region in Northeastern Italy. The research highlights the importance of monitoring and managing such burdens for knowledge assets so as to mitigate the adverse effects of digitalisation on public administration.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] Abeysekera I., 2003, Journal of Human Resource Costing Accounting, V7, P7
  • [2] Accounting and accountability for the digital transformation of public services
    Agostino, Deborah
    Bracci, Enrico
    Steccolini, Ileana
    [J]. FINANCIAL ACCOUNTABILITY & MANAGEMENT, 2022, 38 (02) : 145 - 151
  • [3] Atkinson Rowland, 2001, Social Research Update, V33, P1
  • [4] The best configuration of collaborative knowledge innovation management from the perspective of artificial intelligence
    Bai, XuJing
    Li, JiaJun
    [J]. KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT RESEARCH & PRACTICE, 2020,
  • [5] Types of administrative burden reduction strategies: who, what, and how
    Benish, Avishai
    Tarshish, Noam
    Holler, Roni
    Gal, John
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH AND THEORY, 2024, 34 (03) : 349 - 358
  • [6] Universal and contextualized public services: Digital public service innovation framework
    Bertot, John
    Estevez, Elsa
    Janowski, Tomasz
    [J]. GOVERNMENT INFORMATION QUARTERLY, 2016, 33 (02) : 211 - 222
  • [7] SNOWBALL SAMPLING - PROBLEMS AND TECHNIQUES OF CHAIN REFERRAL SAMPLING
    BIERNACKI, P
    WALDORF, D
    [J]. SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS & RESEARCH, 1981, 10 (02) : 141 - 163
  • [8] Bozeman B., 2011, Rules and Red Tape: A Prism for Public Administration Theory and Research
  • [9] Bracci E., 2019, Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting and Financial Management, V31, P103, DOI [10.1108/jpbafm-07-2018-0077, DOI 10.1108/JPBAFM-07-2018-0077]
  • [10] The application of intellectual capital reports in local authorities: analysis and empirical evidence
    Bronzetti, Giovanni
    Sicoli, Graziella
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF KNOWLEDGE-BASED DEVELOPMENT, 2011, 2 (01) : 85 - 106