Complete Chloroplast Genome of Crassula aquatica: Comparative Genomic Analysis and Phylogenetic Relationships

Background/Objectives: Crassula aquatica (L.) Schonl. is a very small annual plant growing along riverbanks. Chloroplast (cp) genomes, crucial for photosynthesis, are highly conserved and play a key role in understanding plant evolution. In this study, we conducted cp genome analysis of C. aquatica, aiming to elucidate its phylogenetic position and structural variations. We analyzed and described the features of the complete cp genome of C. aquatica and conducted comparative analysis with the cp genomes of closely related taxa. Rsults: The cp genome was 144,503 bp in length and exhibited the typical quadripartite structure, consisting of a large single-copy region (LSC; 77,993 bp), a small single-copy region (SSC; 16,784 bp), and two inverted repeats (24,863 bp). The cp genome of C. aquatica comprised 113 unique genes, including 79 protein-coding genes (PCGs), 30 tRNAs, and 4 rRNA genes. Comparative genomic analysis of 13 other Crassula species and six outgroups demonstrated highly conserved gene content and order among Crassula species. However, notable differences were observed, including the complete loss of the rpoC1 intron in C. aquatica and several closely related species, which may serve as a synapomorphic trait supporting the monophyly of the subgenus Disporocarpa. We analyzed the nucleotide diversity among 14 Crassula cp genomes and identified five highly variable regions (pi > 0.08) in the IGS regions. Phylogenetic analysis based on 78 PCGs confirmed the monophyly of Crassula and its division into two subgenera: Crassula and Disporocarpa. Although the phylogenetic tree supported the subgeneric classification system, the sectional classification system requires reassessment. Conclusions: In this study, we conducted a comparative analysis of the cp genome of the genus Crassula. We inferred evolutionary trends within the Crassula cp genome and provided molecular evidence supporting the integration of the genus Tillaea into the genus Crassula. However, as this study does not represent all species within the genus Tillaea, further comprehensive phylogenetic analyses are requrired.