The Immediate Effect of a Single Treatment of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation with the StimaWELL 120MTRS System on Multifidus Stiffness in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain

被引:1
|
作者
Wolfe, Daniel [1 ]
Dover, Geoffrey [1 ,2 ]
Boily, Mathieu [3 ]
Fortin, Maryse [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Concordia Univ, Dept Hlth Kinesiol & Appl Physiol, Montreal, PQ H4B 1R6, Canada
[2] Concordia Univ, Sch Hlth, Montreal, PQ H4B 1R6, Canada
[3] McGill Univ, Hlth Ctr, Montreal, PQ H4A 3J1, Canada
[4] CIUSSS Ctr Ouest Ile De Montreal, Ctr Readaptat Constance Lethbridge, Montreal, PQ H4B 1T3, Canada
关键词
chronic low back pain; shear-wave elastography; lumbar multifidus; SHEAR-WAVE ELASTOGRAPHY; LUMBAR MULTIFIDUS; MUSCLE-STIFFNESS; RANGE; CONTRACTION; PERFORMANCE; MOVEMENT; MOTION;
D O I
10.3390/diagnostics14222594
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background/Objectives: Individuals with chronic low back pain (CLBP) have altered lumbar multifidus stiffness properties compared to healthy controls. Although neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) application to the multifidus might affect stiffness, this has never been investigated. The aims of this study were to examine the effect of a single NMES treatment on multifidus stiffness and pain intensity in CLBP patients. Methods: 30 participants (13 male, 17 female) were randomized to one of two intervention ('phasic' and 'combined') protocols with the StimaWELL 120MTRS system. Multifidus stiffness at L4 and L5 was measured via shear-wave elastography (SWE) at rest and in standing prior to, and 15 min after, a 20 min NMES treatment. Pain intensity was measured pre- and post-treatment with the numerical pain rating scale (NPRS). Results: There were significant increases in resting shear modulus at right L4 (p = 0.001) and bilaterally at L5 (p = 0.017; p = 0.020) in the 'combined' intervention group, and a significant between-group difference at right L4 (p < 0.001). There were significant decreases in standing shear modulus at right L4 (p = 0.015) and left L5 (p = 0.036) in the 'combined' intervention group, and a significant between-group difference at left L5 (p = 0.016). Both groups experienced significant decreases in pain intensity (MD combined group = 1.12, 95% CI [0.34, 1.90], p = 0.011) (MD phasic group = 1.42, 95% CI [0.68, 2.16], p = 0.001). Conclusions: There were multiple significant changes in multifidus stiffness in the combined group, but not in the phasic group. Both groups experienced significant decreases in low back pain intensity.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] The effect of phasic versus combined neuromuscular electrical stimulation using the StimaWELL 120MTRS system on multifidus muscle morphology and function in patients with chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial protocol
    Fortin, Maryse
    Wolfe, Daniel
    Dover, Geoffrey
    Boily, Mathieu
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2022, 23 (01)
  • [2] Therapeutic effectiveness of neuromuscular electrical stimulation for treating patients with chronic low back pain
    Guo, Peng
    Wang, Jian-wei
    Tong, An
    MEDICINE, 2018, 97 (48)
  • [3] Stabilization exercises combined with neuromuscular electrical stimulation for patients with chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial
    Alrwaily, Muhammad
    Schneider, Michael
    Sowa, Gwendolyn
    Timko, Michael
    Whitney, Susan L.
    Delitto, Anthony
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2019, 23 (06) : 506 - 515
  • [4] Combined neuromuscular electrical stimulation with motor control exercise can improve lumbar multifidus activation in individuals with recurrent low back pain
    Songjaroen, Sranya
    Sungnak, Panakorn
    Piriyaprasarth, Pagamas
    Wang, Hsing-Kuo
    Laskin, James J.
    Wattananon, Peemongkon
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)
  • [5] Effects of noxious stimulation and pain expectations on neuromuscular control of the spine in patients with chronic low back pain
    Henchoz, Yves
    Tetreau, Charles
    Abboud, Jacques
    Piche, Mathieu
    Descarreaux, Martin
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2013, 13 (10) : 1263 - 1272
  • [6] Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for the treatment of chronic low back pain: A systematic review
    Khadilkar, A
    Milne, S
    Brosseau, L
    Wells, G
    Tugwell, P
    Robinson, V
    Shea, B
    Saginur, M
    SPINE, 2005, 30 (23) : 2657 - 2666
  • [7] Changes in deep lumbar stabilizing muscle thickness by transcutaneous neuromuscular electrical stimulation in patients with low back pain
    Baek, Seung Ok
    Cho, Hee Kyung
    Kim, So Yeon
    Jones, Rodney
    Cho, Yun Woo
    Ahn, Sang Ho
    JOURNAL OF BACK AND MUSCULOSKELETAL REHABILITATION, 2017, 30 (01) : 121 - 127
  • [8] Cortical excitability and multifidus activation responses to transcranial direct current stimulation in patients with chronic low back pain during remission
    Wattananon, Peemongkon
    Thu, Khin Win
    Maharjan, Soniya
    Sornkaew, Kanphajee
    Wang, Hsing-Kuo
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01)
  • [9] Comparative effectiveness of electroacupuncture VS neuromuscular electrical stimulation in the treatment of chronic low back pain in active-duty personals: A single-center, randomized control study
    Meng, Xiao-yan
    Bu, Lan
    Chen, Jia-ying
    Liu, Qiu-jia
    Sun, Li
    Li, Xiao-long
    Wu, Fei-xiang
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [10] Test–retest reliability of the nociceptive withdrawal reflex and electrical pain thresholds after single and repeated stimulation in patients with chronic low back pain
    José A. Biurrun Manresa
    Alban Y. Neziri
    Michele Curatolo
    Lars Arendt-Nielsen
    Ole K. Andersen
    European Journal of Applied Physiology, 2011, 111 : 83 - 92