A child-centred research checklist to improve the design and reporting of paediatric research studies: A descriptive mixed methods study

被引:11
|
作者
Foster, Mandie [1 ,2 ]
Whitehead, L. Lisa [2 ,3 ]
O'Sullivan, Therese A. [4 ]
Hill, Julie [4 ]
Morelius, Evalotte [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Auckland Univ Technol, Sch Clin Sci, Auckland, New Zealand
[2] Edith Cowan Univ, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Joondalup, WA, Australia
[3] Univ Otago, Ctr Postgrad Nursing Studies, Christchurch, New Zealand
[4] Edith Cowan Univ, Nutr & Hlth Innovat Res Inst, Sch Hlth & Med Sci, Joondalup, WA, Australia
[5] Linkopings Univ, Dept Hlth Med & Caring Sci, Linkoping, Sweden
关键词
Children; Checklist; Delphi technique; Ethics; Interdisciplinary research; Paediatric; Research; HEALTH-CARE; PARTICIPATION; CONSENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104958
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background: No internationally developed child-centred research checklist is currently available to enhance the quality and transparency of the development, reporting and evaluation of research undertaken with children. Objective: To develop an internationally relevant, expert informed child-centred research checklist. Design: A descriptive mixed methods study was undertaken in five sequential phases, including a Delphi component. Setting(s): Academic/international context. Methods: This study involved five sequential stages: 1. Literature review using four databases (CINAHL, MEDLINE, Scopus, PsycINFO) and analysis to identify key themes in child-centred research (January 2020). 2. Generate a questionnaire based on the key themes for international experts in child research to provide their opinions on what should be included in a child-centred research checklist (March 2020). 3. Inductive thematic analysis of the experts' responses to generate the initial draft checklist (June 2020). 4. The checklist progressed through three rounds of Delphi study for a wider range of experts to provide their consensus on what a child-centred research checklist should contain (August 2020-February 2021). 5. Refinement of the child-centred research checklist based on the Delphi study (March 2021-November 2022). Results: A total of 160 articles met the inclusion criteria for review and were considered in the development of a 10-item open-ended questionnaire, adapted for four age-brackets (0-1 yrs., 2-4 yrs., 5-10 yrs., >11 yrs). Responses from 14 experts across 10 countries generated 205 generic statements and 76 examples to inform a child- centred research checklist. Following this, 158 experts from eleven disciplines across 18 countries participated in the three round Delphi study (38 % retention rate over the three rounds). The final checklist includes 11 statements and 17 examples represented under three categories of "child-parent consent, assent and dissent", "code of conduct" and "child focused methods". Conclusion: The child-centred research checklist was generated from a mixed methods study undertaken in five sequential phases, with input by 172 experts from 11 disciplines across 19 countries. The child-centred research checklist is the first international, expert informed tool to support good quality and transparent child-centred research. We call on researchers, clinicians, journal editors, organisations, and ethics committees to use this checklist for future research with children. The next phase of this project is engagement with children and their families to refine the checklist. Tweetable abstract: New checklist to support good quality child research practices @IFNAorg.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] PROGRESSING A CHILD-CENTRED RESEARCH AGENDA IN TOURISM STUDIES
    Canosa, Antonia
    Graham, Anne
    Wilson, Erica
    TOURISM ANALYSIS, 2019, 24 (01): : 95 - 100
  • [2] Developing a reporting item checklist for studies of HIV drug resistance prevalence or incidence: a mixed methods study
    Garcia, Cristian
    Holbrook, Anne
    Djiadeu, Pascal
    Alvarez, Elizabeth
    Silva, Jessyca Matos
    Mbuagbaw, Lawrence
    BMJ OPEN, 2024, 14 (03):
  • [3] A novel child-centred core palliative care outcome measure for use in clinical practice and research: findings from a multinational validation study
    Namisango, Eve
    Murtagh, Fliss E. M.
    Bristowe, Katherine
    Downing, Julia
    Powell, Richard A.
    Atieno, Mackuline
    Sandham, Margaret
    Ali, Zipporah
    Meiring, Michelle
    Mwangi-Powell, Faith N.
    Abbas, Melanie
    Fraser, Lorna K.
    Higginson, Irene J.
    Harding, Richard
    HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2025, 23 (01)
  • [4] A Mixed-Methods Social Networks Study Design for Research on Transnational Families
    Bernardi, Laura
    JOURNAL OF MARRIAGE AND FAMILY, 2011, 73 (04) : 788 - 803
  • [5] Methods and results of studies on reporting guideline adherence are poorly reported: a meta-research study
    Dal Santo, Tiffany
    Rice, Danielle B.
    Amiri, Lara S. N.
    Tasleem, Amina
    Li, Kexin
    Boruff, Jill T.
    Geoffroy, Marie-Claude
    Benedetti, Andrea
    Thombs, Brett D.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2023, 159 : 225 - 234
  • [6] The concept of needs in child well-being research: Lessons from a mixed methods study in Germany
    Wilmes, Johanna
    Andresen, Sabine
    CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES REVIEW, 2023, 150
  • [7] Identifying research priorities for infection prevention and control. A mixed methods study with a convergent design
    Smiddy, Mp
    Burton, E.
    Kingston, L.
    Poovelikunnel, T. Thomas
    Moyo, M.
    Flores, A.
    JOURNAL OF INFECTION PREVENTION, 2024, 25 (03) : 59 - 65
  • [8] Developing a strategy to improve data sharing in health research: A mixed-methods study to identify barriers and facilitators
    Krahe, Michelle A.
    Wolski, Malcolm
    Mickan, Sharon
    Toohey, Julie
    Scuffham, Paul
    Reilly, Sheena
    HEALTH INFORMATION MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2023, 52 (01) : 18 - 27
  • [9] Doing challenging research studies in a patient-centred way: a qualitative study to inform a randomised controlled trial in the paediatric emergency care setting
    Woolfall, Kerry
    Young, Bridget
    Frith, Lucy
    Appleton, Richard
    Iyer, Anand
    Messahel, Shrouk
    Hickey, Helen
    Gamble, Carrol
    BMJ OPEN, 2014, 4 (05):
  • [10] Research Protocol: A Transdisciplinary Multi-Case Study Research Design Using Mixed Methods to Evaluate the Long-Term Impact of Holocaust Museum Education in Australia
    Robinson, Helena
    Alba, Avril
    Frieze, Donna-Lee
    Cooke, Steven
    Singleton, Andrew
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITATIVE METHODS, 2024, 23