Combining Default Choices and an Encounter Decision Aid to Improve Tobacco Cessation in Primary Care Patients: A Pragmatic, Cluster-Randomized Trial

被引:0
作者
Selby, Kevin [1 ]
Habfast-Robertson, Ines [1 ]
Durand, Marie-Anne [1 ,2 ]
Hempel-Bruder, Christina [1 ]
Boesch, Anne [1 ]
Marti, Joachim [7 ]
Kazaal, Yasser [3 ]
Faouzi, Mohamed [8 ]
Maisonneuve, Hubert [4 ,5 ]
Berlin, Ivan [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lausanne, Univ Ctr Primary Care & Publ Hlth Unisante, Dept Ambulatory Care, Rue Bugnon 44, CH-1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
[2] Dartmouth Coll, Dartmouth Inst Hlth Policy & Clin Practice, Lebanon, NH USA
[3] CHU Vaudois, Dept Addict Med, Lausanne, Switzerland
[4] Univ Geneva, Univ Inst Primary Care, Fac Med, Geneva, Switzerland
[5] Univ Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Univ Coll Gen Med, Lyon, France
[6] Sorbonne Univ, Hosp Pitie Salpetriere, Dept Pharmacol Med, Paris, France
[7] Univ Lausanne, Univ Ctr Primary Care & Publ Hlth Unisante, Dept Epidemiol & Hlth Syst, Lausanne, Switzerland
[8] Univ Lausanne, Univ Ctr Primary Care & Publ Hlth Unisante, Div Biostat, Lausanne, Switzerland
关键词
smoking cessation; primary care; decision aid; default choice; SMOKING-CESSATION; SMOKERS; QUIT; VALIDATION; MOTIVATION; DEPENDENCE; HELP; OPT;
D O I
10.1007/s11606-024-09088-9
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundPrimary care providers (PCPs) prescribe less often treatments for smoking cessation than for other major risk factors. We assessed the effect of training PCPs to offer smoking cessation treatments to current smokers as the default choice using an encounter decision aid (DA) on smoking cessation. MethodsPragmatic, cluster-randomized controlled trial with PCPs in private practice in Switzerland and France. The intervention was a half-day course teaching PCPs the default choice approach using a DA. Control PCPs received a 1-h refresher training on smoking cessation aids. PCPs recruited daily smokers seen for routine care. The primary outcome was self-reported, 7-day, point prevalence smoking abstinence at 6 months. Secondary outcomes were quit attempts and use of smoking cessation aids at 3 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months, and a patient-reported measure of shared decision-making (CollaboRATE scale 1-10, higher scores = more involvement). ResultsForty-two PCPs completed the training (76% Swiss) and recruited 287 current smokers (105 intervention group, 182 control group), with 51% women, mean age 48 (SD, 2.6), 77% who smoked <20 cigarettes/day, and 221 who responded at 6 months follow-up (77%). The intervention did not affect self-reported smoking abstinence rate at 6 months (9.5% intervention and 10.4% control groups, respectively; OR 0.88 (95%CI 0.37-2.10). It did however increase the number of quit attempts at 3 weeks (OR 2.09, 95%CI 1.04-4.20) and the use of smoking cessation aids at the 3-week and 3-month follow-ups (OR 2.57, 95%CI 1.21-5.45 and OR 2.00, 95%CI 1.11-3.60, respectively). The mean CollaboRATE score was 8.05/10 in the intervention group and 7.28/10 in the control group (p=0.02), reflecting more patient involvement in decision-making. ConclusionTraining PCPs to use a decision aid did not improve smoking abstinence rate, despite short-term increases in quit attempts and use of smoking cessation aids. It improved patient involvement in decision-making. Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04868474.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, TREATING TOBACCO USE
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2021, Lancet, V397, P2337, DOI [10.1016/s0140-6736(21)01169-7, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01169-7]
  • [3] Uptake and efficacy of a systematic intensive smoking cessation intervention using motivational interviewing for smokers hospitalised for an acute coronary syndrome: a multicentre before-after study with parallel group comparisons
    Auer, Reto
    Gencer, Baris
    Tango, Rodrigo
    Nanchen, David
    Matter, Christian M.
    Luscher, Thomas Felix
    Windecker, Stephan
    Mach, Francois
    Cornuz, Jacques
    Humair, Jean-Paul
    Rodondi, Nicolas
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2016, 6 (09):
  • [4] Implementation of routine biochemical validation and an opt out' referral pathway for smoking cessation in pregnancy
    Bauld, Linda
    Hackshaw, Lucy
    Ferguson, Janet
    Coleman, Tim
    Taylor, Gordon
    Salway, Ruth
    [J]. ADDICTION, 2012, 107 : 53 - 60
  • [5] Comorbidities and Tobacco Dependence Treatment Initiation
    Berlin, Ivan
    [J]. NICOTINE & TOBACCO RESEARCH, 2016, 18 (08) : 1683 - 1683
  • [6] Undertreatment of Tobacco Use Relative to Other Chronic Conditions
    Bernstein, Steven L.
    Yu, Sunkyung
    Post, Lori A.
    Dziura, James
    Rigotti, Nancy A.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2013, 103 (08) : E59 - E65
  • [7] How much unsuccessful quitting activity is going on among adult smokers? Data from the International Tobacco Control Four Country cohort survey
    Borland, Ron
    Partos, Timea R.
    Yong, Hua-Hie
    Cummings, K. Michael
    Hyland, Andrew
    [J]. ADDICTION, 2012, 107 (03) : 673 - 682
  • [8] 'Opt-out' referrals after identifying pregnant smokers using exhaled air carbon monoxide: impact on engagement with smoking cessation support
    Campbell, Katarzyna A.
    Cooper, Sue
    Fahy, Samantha J.
    Bowker, Katharine
    Leonardi-Bee, Jo
    McEwen, Andy
    Whitemore, Rachel
    Coleman, Tim
    [J]. TOBACCO CONTROL, 2017, 26 (03) : 300 - 306
  • [9] Consort 2010 statement: extension to cluster randomised trials
    Campbell, Marion K.
    Piaggio, Gilda
    Elbourne, Diana R.
    Altman, Douglas G.
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 345
  • [10] Training health professionals in smoking cessation
    Carson, K., V
    Verbiest, M. E. A.
    Crone, M. R.
    Brinn, M. P.
    Esterman, A. J.
    Assendelft, W. J. J.
    Smith, B. J.
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2012, (05):