Development of a Canadian Guidance for reporting real-world evidence for regulatory and health-technology assessment (HTA) decision-making

被引:0
作者
Tadrous, Mina [1 ]
Aves, Theresa
Fahim, Christine [2 ]
Riad, Jessica
Mittmann, Nicole [3 ]
Prieto-Alhambra, Daniel [4 ]
Rivera, Donna R.
Chan, Kelvin
Lix, Lisa M.
Kent, Seamus
Dawoud, Dalia
Guertin, Jason Robert
Mcdonald, James Ted
Round, Jeff [5 ]
Klarenbach, Scott
Stanojevic, Sanja
Vera, Mary A. De
Strumpf, Erin
Platt, Robert W.
Husein, Farah
Lambert, Laurie
Hayes, Kaleen N.
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Leslie Dan Fac Pharm, 144 Coll St, Toronto, ON M5S 3M2, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Inst Hlth Policy Management & Evaluat, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Sunnybrook Res Inst, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Erasmus Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Med Informat, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[5] Inst Hlth Econ, Edmonton, AB, Canada
关键词
Observational studies; Real-world evidence; Pharmacoepidemiology; Health-technology assessment; Regulators; Guidelines; Publishing stan- dards; Epidemiologic research design; CONTROLLED-TRIALS; VALIDATION; CHECKLIST;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111545
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Objective: Real-world evidence (RWE) can complement and fill knowledge gaps from randomized controlled to assist in health-technology assessment (HTA) for regulatory decision-making. However, the generation of RWE is an intricate with many sequential decision points, and different methods and approaches may impact the quality and reliability of evidence. ization and transparency in reporting these decisions is imperative to appraise RWE and incorporate it into HTA decision-making. nership between Canadian health system stakeholders, namely, Health Canada and Canada's Drug Agency (formerly the Canadian for Drugs and Technologies in Health), was established to develop guidance for the standardization of reporting of RWE for regulatory HTA decision-making in Canada. Study Design and Setting:A collaborative initiative to create structured guidance for RWE reporting in the context of regulatory andHTA decision-making.Results:The developed guidance aims to standardize and ensure transparent reporting of RWE to improve its reliability and usefulnessin regulatory and HTA processes.Conclusion:This guidance can be adapted for other jurisdictions and will have future extensions to incorporate emerging issues withRWE and HTA decision-making
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] Propensity Score Methods in Health Technology Assessment: Principles, Extended Applications, and Recent Advances
    Ali, M. Sanni
    Prieto-Alhambra, Daniel
    Cruz Lopes, Luciane
    Ramos, Dandara
    Bispo, Nivea
    Ichihara, Maria Y.
    Pescarini, Julia M.
    Williamson, Elizabeth
    Fiaccone, Rosemeire L.
    Barreto, Mauricio L.
    Smeeth, Liam
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2019, 10
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2021, Guidance for registry based studies
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2020, Registries for evaluating patient outcomes: a user's guide
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2018, CASP Qualitative Checklist
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2020, Environmental scan no. 91)
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2023, Guidelines for good pharmacoepidemiology practices
  • [7] [Anonymous], Matter of H-, 21 IN Dec. 337, 342-43 (BIA 1996). Retrieved from https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/eoir/legacy/2014/07/25/3276.pdf (accessed May 5, 2022)
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2013, Guidance for the format and content of the final study report of noninterventional post authorisation safety studies
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2018, CASP (Case Control Study) Checklist
  • [10] Examining the Use of Real-World Evidence in the Regulatory Process
    Beaulieu-Jones, Brett K.
    Finlayson, Samuel G.
    Yuan, William
    Altman, Russ B.
    Kohane, Isaac S.
    Prasad, Vinay
    Yu, Kun-Hsing
    [J]. CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2020, 107 (04) : 843 - 852