A comprehensive in silico analysis and experimental validation of miRNAs capable of discriminating between lung adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma

被引:0
|
作者
Javanmardifard, Zahra [1 ]
Rahmani, Saeid [2 ]
Bayat, Hadi [3 ]
Mirtavoos-Mahyari, Hanifeh [4 ]
Ghanei, Mostafa [5 ]
Mowla, Seyed Javad [1 ]
机构
[1] Tarbiat Modares Univ, Fac Biol Sci, Dept Mol Genet, Tehran, Iran
[2] Inst Res Fundamental Sci IPM, Sch Comp Sci, Tehran, Iran
[3] McGill Univ, Inst Rech Clin Montreal IRCM, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Div Expt Med,Biochem Neuroendocrinol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[4] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Natl Res Inst TB & Lung Dis NRITLD, Lung Transplantat Res Ctr LTRC, Tehran, Iran
[5] Baqiyatallah Univ Med Sci, Syst Biol & Poisonings Inst, Chem Injuries Res Ctr, Tehran, Iran
关键词
microRNA; NSCLC; machine learning; feature selection; prognosis; qPCR; MICRORNA EXPRESSION; CANCER; MIR-205; TARGETS; PROLIFERATION; CLASSIFICATION; HSA-MIR-205; MIGRATION; DIAGNOSIS; HISTOLOGY;
D O I
10.3389/fgene.2024.1419099
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Background Accurate differentiation between lung adenocarcinoma (AC) and lung squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is crucial owing to their distinct therapeutic approaches. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) exhibit variable expression across subtypes, making them promising biomarkers for discrimination. This study aimed to identify miRNAs with robust discriminatory potential between AC and SCC and elucidate their clinical significance.Methods MiRNA expression profiles for AC and SCC patients were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. Differential expression analysis and supervised machine learning methods (Support Vector Machine, Decision trees and Na & iuml;ve Bayes) were employed. Clinical significance was assessed through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, survival analysis, and correlation with clinicopathological features. Validation was conducted using reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). Furthermore, signaling pathway and gene ontology enrichment analyses were conducted to unveil biological functions.Results Five miRNAs (miR-205-3p, miR-205-5p, miR-944, miR-375 and miR-326) emerged as potential discriminative markers. The combination of miR-944 and miR-326 yielded an impressive area under the curve of 0.985. RT-qPCR validation confirmed their biomarker potential. miR-326 and miR-375 were identified as prognostic factors in AC, while miR-326 and miR-944 correlated significantly with survival outcomes in SCC. Additionally, exploration of signaling pathways implicated their involvement in key pathways including PI3K-Akt, MAPK, FoxO, and Ras.Conclusion This study enhances our understanding of miRNAs as discriminative markers between AC and SCC, shedding light on their role as prognostic indicators and their association with clinicopathological characteristics. Moreover, it highlights their potential involvement in signaling pathways crucial in non-small cell lung cancer pathogenesis.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Difference in Postsurgical Prognostic Factors between Lung Adenocarcinoma and Squamous Cell Carcinoma
    Nakamura, Haruhiko
    Sakai, Hiroki
    Kimura, Hiroyuki
    Miyazawa, Tomoyuki
    Marushima, Hideki
    Saji, Hisashi
    ANNALS OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2017, 23 (06) : 291 - 297
  • [32] Small cell carcinoma of the lung in a patient with previously treated synchronous adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma
    Ullah, Asad
    Munagala, Rohit
    Mishra, Pranjal
    Singh, Kanwar
    Kozman, Diana
    Mattox, Samantha
    Keshavamurthy, Jayanth
    Patel, Nikhil
    LUNG INDIA, 2021, 38 (03) : 263 - 265
  • [33] Desmoglein 3 and Keratin 14 for Distinguishing Between Lung Adenocarcinoma and Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma
    Dong, Yanting
    Li, Shicheng
    Sun, Xiao
    Wang, Yuanyong
    Lu, Tong
    Wo, Yang
    Leng, Xiaoliang
    Kong, Dezhi
    Jiao, Wenjie
    ONCOTARGETS AND THERAPY, 2020, 13 : 11111 - 11124
  • [34] Differential matrix metalloproteinase levels in adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the lung
    Shah, Sonam A.
    Spinale, Francis G.
    Ikonomidis, John S.
    Stroud, Robert E.
    Chang, Eileen I.
    Reed, Carolyn E.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2010, 139 (04) : 984 - 990
  • [35] A prediction model for distinguishing lung squamous cell carcinoma from adenocarcinoma
    Li, Hui
    Jiang, Zhengran
    Leng, Qixin
    Bai, Fan
    Wang, Juan
    Ding, Xiaosong
    Li, Yuehong
    Zhang, Xianghong
    Fang, HongBin
    Yfantis, Harris G.
    Xing, Lingxiao
    Jiang, Feng
    ONCOTARGET, 2017, 8 (31) : 50704 - 50714
  • [36] miRNAs expression of oral squamous cell carcinoma patients Validation of two putative biomarkers
    Chamorro Petronacci, Cintia Micaela
    Perez-Sayans, Mario
    Padin Iruegas, Maria Elena
    Suarez Penaranda, Jose M.
    Lorenzo Pouso, Alejandro Ismael
    Blanco Carrion, Andres
    Garcia Garcia, Abel
    MEDICINE, 2019, 98 (13)
  • [37] Comparison of squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the lung by metabolomic analysis of tissue-serum pairs
    Jordan, K. W.
    Adkins, C. B.
    Su, L.
    Halpern, E. F.
    Mark, E. J.
    Christiani, D. C.
    Cheng, L. L.
    LUNG CANCER, 2010, 68 (01) : 44 - 50
  • [38] Transcriptome analysis of distinct long non-coding RNA transcriptional fingerprints in lung adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma
    Wei, Yaqiang
    Zhang, Xiaofei
    TUMOR BIOLOGY, 2016, 37 (12) : 16275 - 16285
  • [39] Discover Mutational Differences Between Lung Adenocarcinoma and Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Search for More Effective Biomarkers for Immunotherapy
    Lan, Sai te er Nu er
    Yu, Bo
    Yang, Yan
    Shen, Yanli
    Xu, Bing
    Zhan, Yiyi
    Liu, Chunling
    CANCER MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH, 2024, 16 : 1759 - 1773
  • [40] AGTR1 promoter hypermethylation in lung squamous cell carcinoma but not in lung adenocarcinoma
    Chen, Ruhua
    Hong, Qingxiao
    Jiang, Jianzhong
    Chen, Xiaoying
    Jiang, Zhenhuan
    Wang, Jinzhi
    Liu, Shunlin
    Duan, Shiwei
    Shi, Shunbin
    ONCOLOGY LETTERS, 2017, 14 (04) : 4989 - 4994