Multi-Attribute evaluation-based graph model for conflict resolution considering heterogeneous behaviors

被引:3
|
作者
Liu, Peide [1 ,2 ]
Fu, Yingxin [1 ]
Wang, Peng [1 ]
Wu, Xiaoming [3 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Management Sci & Engn, Jinan 250014, Shandong, Peoples R China
[2] Shandong Univ Finance & Econ, Shandong Key Lab Blockchain Finance, Jinan 250014, Peoples R China
[3] Qilu Univ Technol, Shandong Acad Sci, Fac Comp Sci & Technol, Jinan 250353, Shandong, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Group decisions and negotitations; the graph; model of conflict resolution; Multi-attribute evaluation; Heterogeneous behavior; Social network analysis; GROUP DECISION-MAKING; FUZZY PREFERENCES; CONSENSUS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ins.2024.121386
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The graph model for conflict resolution (GMCR) is a useful tool for modeling and analyzing conflicts. In a conflict, the decision maker (DM)'s evaluation of feasible states is often influenced by multiple attributes. When in different feasible states, DMs may assign different importance to each attribute. Therefore, this paper applies multi-attribute evaluation (MAE) to GMCR and proposes the MAE-based stability definition. In addition, due to differences in relationships and opinions among DMs, opponents will behave differently in response to the action of the focal DM. To analyze the heterogeneous behavior of opponents, this paper proposes a heterogeneous behavior analysis method based on social network analysis (SNA) and opinion similarity. Then, the MAE-based mixed stability definitions are proposed to perform the stability analysis considering heterogeneous behaviors. Finally, this paper applies the proposed method to the Elmira contamination conflict and makes a sensitivity analysis to prove the validity of the proposed method.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Negotiation model based on GAI multi-attribute dependence
    School of Information Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, China
    不详
    Moshi Shibie yu Rengong Zhineng/Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence, 2008, 21 (05): : 569 - 576
  • [22] An Integrated Multi-Attribute Model for Evaluation of Sustainable Mobile Phone
    Yazdani, Morteza
    Chatterjee, Prasenjit
    Jose Montero-Simo, Maria
    Araque-Padilla, Rafael A.
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (13):
  • [23] Risk-Based Multi-Attribute Decision-Making for Normal Cloud Model Considering Pre-Evaluation Information
    Ma, Zhenzhen
    Zhang, Shitao
    IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 : 153891 - 153904
  • [24] Probabilistic-based expressions in behavioral multi-attribute decision making considering pre-evaluation
    Ma, Zhenzhen
    Zhu, Jianjun
    Zhang, Shitao
    FUZZY OPTIMIZATION AND DECISION MAKING, 2021, 20 (01) : 145 - 173
  • [25] Probabilistic-based expressions in behavioral multi-attribute decision making considering pre-evaluation
    Zhenzhen Ma
    Jianjun Zhu
    Shitao Zhang
    Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 2021, 20 : 145 - 173
  • [26] Multi-attribute group decision of engineering project bid evaluation based on cloud model
    Hu, Yungang
    Li, Cunbin
    Gao, Po
    BASIC & CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & TOXICOLOGY, 2019, 125 : 107 - 107
  • [27] An Expressway ETC Missing Data Restoration Model Considering Multi-Attribute Features
    Zou, Fumin
    Zhou, Zhaoyi
    Cai, Qiqin
    Guo, Feng
    Zhang, Xinyi
    SENSORS, 2023, 23 (21)
  • [28] A heterogeneous GRA-CBR-based multi-attribute emergency decision-making model considering weight optimization with dual information correlation
    Chen, Wenlong
    Wang, Xiaoling
    Wang, Wei
    Zhu, Yushan
    Cai, Zhijian
    Yang, Shuai
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2021, 182
  • [29] An equilibrium model of the supply chain network under multi-attribute behaviors analysis
    Chan, Chi Kin
    Zhou, Yan
    Wong, Kar Hung
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2019, 275 (02) : 514 - 535
  • [30] Wind Power Benefit Evaluation Based on Fuzzy Multi-Attribute
    Li, Jin-Ying
    Fan, Jia-Jia
    Gong, Yue
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT ENGINEERING (ICEME 2014), 2014, : 293 - 296