Life cycle assessment of swine manure management: A comparison of different management systems with Montecarlo simulation

被引:1
作者
Alvaro, Alfonso Garcia [1 ,2 ]
Martinez-Hernando, Maria-Pilar [3 ]
Garcia-Martinez, Maria-Jesus [3 ]
Palomar, Cesar Ruiz [1 ,2 ]
Rodriguez, Maria del Carmen Suarez [3 ]
Hermosilla, Daphne [4 ,5 ]
Ortega, Marcelo F. [3 ]
Crespo, Ignacio de Godos [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Valladolid UVA, Dept Chem Engn & Environm Technol, Campus Univ Duques Soria, Soria 42004, Spain
[2] Univ Valladolid, Inst Sustainable Proc, Valladolid, Spain
[3] Univ Politecn Madrid, Lab Project Engn, ETSI Minas & Energia, Alenza 4, Madrid 28003, Spain
[4] Univ Politecn Madrid, Escuela Tecn Super Ingn Montes Forestal & Medio Na, G Aqua Res Grp, Calle Jose Antonio Novais 10, Madrid, Spain
[5] Univ Politecn Madrid, Escuela Tecn Super Ingn Montes Forestal & Medio Na, Dept Forest & Environm Engn & Management, Calle Jose Antonio Novais 10, Madrid, Spain
关键词
Biogas; Energy recovery; Life cycle assessment; Montecarlo simulation; Pig farming; Waste management; METHANE EMISSIONS; CO-DIGESTION; PIG SLURRY; MITIGATION; AMMONIA; STORAGE; CLIMATE; ENERGY; WATER;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.145368
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The agricultural industry deeply impacts in the environment due to methane, an important greenhouse gas (GHG), and ammonia emissions that causes acidification and eutrophication. Recognising the urgency of addressing the environmental impact, this study analyses different manure management strategies coupled with diverse energy sources. The principal analytical tool employed was Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), with a focus on evaluating environmental impacts and discerning the most sustainable approach within this context. In addition, Monte Carlo Analysis (MCA) was applied to explore how emissions may fluctuate in response to variations of manure composition. This research contributes to ongoing efforts to align agricultural practices with sustainability goals and reduce the environmental impact. Five scenarios proposed on the swine manure management, based on biogas and solar energy, demonstrate a substantial positive impact on the climate change category when an anaerobic digestion stage is incorporated into the process. Conversely, the impacts related with ammonia emissions were not significantly reduced with the introduction of renewable technologies in the farming. The MCA revealed a high dependence on the chemical composition of the manure for the impacts climate change and acidification in case of the simplest scenarios studied, without biogas production. The application of a solar energy system improves the energy balance and consequently reduce the overall environmental impact. In this sense, hybrid panels that simultaneously generate thermal and electric energy presented the highest energy recovery but significantly higher impacts on eutrophication, toxicity and resource use, due to the higher complexity of materials of these systems.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   Comparative life cycle assessment of anaerobic co-digestion for dairy waste management in large-scale farms [J].
Adghim, Mohamad ;
Abdallah, Mohamed ;
Saad, Suhair ;
Shanableh, Abdallah ;
Sartaj, Majid ;
El Mansouri, Ahmed Eltigani .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 256
[2]   Microbial analysis of anaerobic digester reveals prevalence of manure microbiota [J].
Alvaro, Alfonso Garcia ;
Palomar, Cesar Ruiz ;
Valenzuela, Edgardo I. ;
Redondo, Daphne Hermosilla ;
Torre, Raul Munoz ;
Crespo, Ignacio de Godos .
JOURNAL OF WATER PROCESS ENGINEERING, 2024, 60
[3]   Hybridization of anaerobic digestion with solar energy: A solution for isolated livestock farms [J].
Alvaro, Alfonso Garcia ;
Palomar, Cesar Ruiz ;
Torre, Raul Munoz ;
Redondo, Daphne Hermosilla ;
Crespo, Ignacio de Godos .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT-X, 2023, 20
[4]   The greenhouse gas emissions of an electrified vehicle combined with renewable fuels: Life cycle assessment and policy implications [J].
Andersson, Oivind ;
Borjesson, Pal .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2021, 289
[5]   Methane emissions from digestate at an agricultural biogas plant [J].
Balde, Hambaliou ;
VanderZaag, Andrew C. ;
Burtt, Stephen D. ;
Wagner-Riddle, Claudia ;
Crolla, Anna ;
Desjardins, Raymond L. ;
MacDonald, Douglas J. .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 216 :914-922
[6]   Cradle-to-grave life cycle assessment of production and consumption of pulses in the United States [J].
Bandekar, Prathamesh A. ;
Putman, Ben ;
Thoma, Greg ;
Matlock, Marty .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2022, 302
[7]   New opportunities for the European Biogas industry: A review on current installation development, production potentials and yield improvements for manure and agricultural waste mixtures [J].
Bumharter, Cornelis ;
Bolonio, David ;
Amez, Isabel ;
Garcia Martinez, Maria Jesus ;
Ortega, Marcelo F. .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2023, 388
[8]   Hybridization of solar photovoltaic and biogas system: Experimental, economic and environmental analysis [J].
Buragohain, Sachankar ;
Mohanty, Kaustubha ;
Mahanta, Pinakeswar .
SUSTAINABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES AND ASSESSMENTS, 2021, 45
[9]   Current state of biogas and biomethane production and its implications for Spain [J].
Calero, M. ;
Godoy, V. ;
Heras, C. Garcia ;
Lozano, E. ;
Arjandas, S. ;
Martin-Lara, M. A. .
SUSTAINABLE ENERGY & FUELS, 2023, 7 (15) :3584-3602
[10]   Integration of swine manure anaerobic digestion and digestate nutrients removal/recovery under a circular economy concept [J].
Candido, Daniela ;
Bolsan, Alice Chiapetti ;
Hollas, Camila Ester ;
Venturin, Bruno ;
Tapparo, Deisi Cristina ;
Bonassa, Gabriela ;
Antes, Fabiane Goldschmidt ;
Steinmetz, Ricardo Lufs Radis ;
Bortoli, Marcelo ;
Kunz, Airton .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2022, 301