Organizational standards for specialist palliative care for adult patients: Recommendations of the Expert Group of National Consultants in Palliative Medicine and Palliative Care Nursing

被引:0
作者
Leppert, Wojciech [1 ,2 ]
Gradalski, Tomasz [3 ]
Kotlinska-Lemieszek, Aleksandra [2 ,4 ]
Kaptacz, Izabela [5 ,6 ]
Bialon-Janusz, Anna [3 ]
Pawlowski, Leszek [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zielona Gora, Coll Med, Inst Med Sci, Dept Palliat Med, Zielona Gora, Poland
[2] Univ Hosp Heliodor Swiecicki, Partner Poznan Univ Med Sci, Osiedle Rusa 55, PL-61245 Poznan, Poland
[3] St Lazarus Hosp Soc Friends Sick Krakow, Krakow, Poland
[4] Poznan Univ Med Sci, Dept Palliat Med, Poznan, Poland
[5] Med Univ Silesia, Dept Palliat Med & Care, Katowice, Poland
[6] Hosp Care Assoc Czestochowa, Palliat Care Dept Czestochowa, Czestochowa, Poland
[7] Med Univ Gdansk, Dept Palliat Med, Gdansk, Poland
来源
PALLIATIVE MEDICINE IN PRACTICE | 2022年 / 16卷 / 01期
关键词
organization; palliative care; palliative care nursing; palliative medicine; standards; GUIDELINES; IMPLEMENTATION; MULTICENTER; INTEGRATION; CANCER; PAIN;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: The study aimed to develop organizational standards for specialist palliative care for adult patients (OSSPCAP) in Poland. Methods: The National Consultants in Palliative Medicine and Palliative Care Nursing appointed an Expert Group consisting of three physicians - independent researchers, two nurses and a lawyer to develop the OSSPCAP. The work was done in three stages. 1. Literature analysis (Scopus and PubMed databases) and legislation on palliative care. 2. Questionnaire development using Google Forms and survey of 120 respondents in two rounds using the Delphi method. 3. Analysis of the results by the Expert Group during remote meetings and determination of the final version of the OSSPCAP.Results: The response rate in the first round of the survey was 71 (59.17%) and in the second 56 (46.67%). The first round yielded 73 positive responses (at least 70% criterion) to 97 questions; the second round yielded 21 positive responses to 31 questions. For the remaining ten questions, the Expert Group members discussed the results obtained with at least 50% criterion of positive responses. The results of both rounds were analyzed, and the final version of the document was accepted by all members of the Expert Group.Conclusions: Palliative care was divided into two types (levels): palliative care elements (palliative care ap-proach) and specialist palliative care. In the latter home, inpatient and outpatient care was distinguished with ensuring public funding for all their organizational units by the State, including the integration into the guaranteed benefits. Requirements and procedures for all organizational units of specialist palliative care were depicted. Three specialist inpatient palliative care referral levels were offered taking into account complexity of services for patients, under- and postgraduate education. Principles of qualifying patients for palliative care, the development of research and education in palliative medicine and palliative care nursing were presented
引用
收藏
页数:90
相关论文
共 86 条
  • [1] Adamkova N., 2020, CARITAS ET VERITAS, V10, P100, DOI [10.32725/cetv.2020.011, DOI 10.32725/CETV.2020.011]
  • [2] [Anonymous], Ustawa z dnia 20 lipca 2017 r. Prawo wodne (Dz. U. 2017, poz. 1566 z pozn. zm.)
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2021, SUFFERING IS HLTH RE
  • [4] [Anonymous], USTAWA DNIA 27 PAZDZ
  • [5] [Anonymous], USTAWA DNIA 24 KWIET
  • [6] [Anonymous], ROZPORZADZENIE MINIS
  • [7] [Anonymous], USTAWA DNIA 30 KWIET
  • [8] [Anonymous], USTAWA DNIA 8 CZERWC
  • [9] [Anonymous], USTAWA DNIA 5 GRUDNI
  • [10] [Anonymous], 1999, MATERIA Y DLA SWIADC