Estimation of fast pyrolysis product yields of different biomasses by artificial neural networks

被引:0
作者
Sezgin, Ismail Veli [1 ]
Merdun, Hasan [1 ]
机构
[1] Akdeniz Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Environm Engn, TR-07058 Antalya, Turkiye
关键词
Biomass; Fast pyrolysis; Drop-tube-reactor system; Product yield; Artificial neural networks; BIO-OIL PRODUCTION; RENEWABLE ENERGY; HEATING VALUE; CO-PYROLYSIS; SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION; CATALYTIC PYROLYSIS; WASTE BIOMASS; PALM SHELL; PREDICTION; OPTIMIZATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.cherd.2025.01.009
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
In this study, the yields of different biomasses and wastewater sludges obtained in the drop-tube-reactor fast pyrolysis system were estimated by feedforward artificial neural networks (ANN) models using a total of 174 experimental data. The performances of 14 developed models in estimating the yields were investigated by using 7 data sets consisting of 21 input parameters with different data sizes, hidden layers, and neuron numbers. The best and average MSE values obtained from ANN application for bio-oil (BO) output of 14 models are listed from smallest to largest. Models numbered as 5-10-14 with lower top 3 average MSE values were selected as better models in the ranking. Among the three models, the ANN architecture has 1 hidden layer, 20 neurons, and 75-15-15 % data division for training-testing-validation. ANN architecture performance for BO output was applied to two different datasets for biochar (BC), BC-BO, and BC-BO-BG (biogas) products within the scope of models 5-10-14 and their performances were examined with MSE and R2 statistical parameters. The lowest and highet MSE values were 3.91 and 6.99 for BO and BC estimations in the first database, but they were 3.67 and 10.72 for BO and BC-BO estimations in the second database, respectively.
引用
收藏
页码:32 / 42
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Approximate estimation of the product life cycle cost using artificial neural networks in conceptual design
    Seo, K
    Park, JH
    Jang, DS
    Wallace, D
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2002, 19 (06) : 461 - 471
  • [32] Catalytic Pyrolysis of PET Polymer Using Nonisothermal Thermogravimetric Analysis Data: Kinetics and Artificial Neural Networks Studies
    Dubdub, Ibrahim
    Alhulaybi, Zaid
    POLYMERS, 2023, 15 (01)
  • [33] Estimation of research reactor core parameters using cascade feed forward artificial neural networks
    Hedayat, Afshin
    Davilu, Hadi
    Barfrosh, Ahmad Abdollahzadeh
    Sepanloo, Kamran
    PROGRESS IN NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2009, 51 (6-7) : 709 - 718
  • [34] A comparative study for the estimation of geodetic point velocity by artificial neural networks
    Yilmaz, M.
    Gullu, M.
    JOURNAL OF EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCE, 2014, 123 (04) : 791 - 808
  • [35] AN ESTIMATION OF TRANSPORT ENERGY DEMAND IN TURKEY VIA ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS
    Codur, Muhammed Yasin
    Unal, Ahmet
    PROMET-TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION, 2019, 31 (02): : 151 - 161
  • [36] Estimation of Burned Areas In Forest Fires Using Artificial Neural Networks
    Calp, M. Hanefi
    Kose, Utku
    INGENIERIA SOLIDARIA, 2020, 16 (03):
  • [37] Estimation of earthworks execution time cost by means of artificial neural networks
    Hola, Bozena
    Schabowicz, Krzysztof
    AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION, 2010, 19 (05) : 570 - 579
  • [38] Application of artificial neural networks in the prediction of product distribution in electrophoretically mediated microanalysis
    Ann, Toni
    Porcasi, Lyra
    Muliadi, Sarah
    Hanrahan, Grady
    Gomez, Frank A.
    ELECTROPHORESIS, 2009, 30 (13) : 2385 - 2389
  • [39] UTILIZATION OF ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS TO PREDICT THE INFLUENCE OF MILLING TYPE ON THE QUALITY PRODUCT
    De Oliveira-Leite, Wanderson
    Carlos Campos-Rubio, Juan
    Mata-Cabrera, Francisco
    Tejero-Manzanares, Jose
    Hanafi, Issam
    DYNA, 2014, 89 (04): : 457 - 466
  • [40] Transfer learning with artificial neural networks between injection molding processes and different polymer materials
    Lockner, Yannik
    Hopmann, Christian
    Zhao, Weibo
    JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING PROCESSES, 2022, 73 : 395 - 408