Insights into cognitive mechanics from education, developmental psychology and cognitive science

被引:0
作者
Hartshorne, Joshua K. [1 ]
Jing, Mengguo [2 ]
机构
[1] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Commun Sci & Disorders, Inst Hlth Profess, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, Crane Ctr Early Childhood Res & Policy, Columbus, OH USA
来源
NATURE REVIEWS PSYCHOLOGY | 2025年 / 4卷 / 04期
关键词
FORCE CONCEPT INVENTORY; TEST-TAKING BEHAVIOR; INTUITIVE PHYSICS; BALANCE-SCALE; CHILDRENS REPRESENTATIONS; INTRODUCTORY PHYSICS; CURVILINEAR MOTION; RULE USE; SUPPORT; OBJECT;
D O I
10.1038/s44159-025-00412-6
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Humans reason implicitly and explicitly about the physical world, which enables them to successfully interact with and manipulate objects in their environment. This reasoning is studied under different names across three main literatures: education, developmental psychology and cognitive science. At a high level, education researchers examine the acquisition of formal scientific knowledge, developmental psychologists explore children's emerging understanding of their physical surroundings and cognitive scientists analyse the structure of the mind. These different disciplines have reached divergent conclusions about what children and adults know about 'cognitive mechanics' and developed parallel scientific theories of these phenomena. In this Review, we describe the findings of these three literatures and conclude that each literature contributes robust and reliable findings that must be taken seriously even when they seem to be contradictory. We suggest that further progress requires reconciling these literatures; one avenue is to consider multiple interlocking cognitive mechanisms that are differentially engaged across scenarios and across development. Finally, we outline a research programme to further reconcile these literatures.
引用
收藏
页码:277 / 291
页数:15
相关论文
共 211 条
[1]   Contrastive machine learning reveals the structure of neuroanatomical variation within autism [J].
Aglinskas, Aidas ;
Hartshorne, Joshua K. ;
Anzellotti, Stefano .
SCIENCE, 2022, 376 (6597) :1070-+
[2]   A role for visual areas in physics simulations [J].
Ahuja, Aarit ;
Desrochers, Theresa M. ;
Sheinberg, David L. .
COGNITIVE NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 38 (7-8) :425-439
[3]   Lifelong learning of cognitive styles for physical problem-solving: The effect of embodied experience [J].
Allen, Kelsey R. ;
Smith, Kevin A. ;
Bird, Laura-Ashleigh ;
Tenenbaum, Joshua B. ;
Makin, Tamar R. ;
Cowie, Dorothy .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2024, 31 (03) :1364-1375
[4]   IS THE TOP OBJECT ADEQUATELY SUPPORTED BY THE BOTTOM OBJECT - YOUNG INFANTS UNDERSTANDING OF SUPPORT RELATIONS [J].
BAILLARGEON, R ;
HANKOSUMMERS, S .
COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT, 1990, 5 (01) :29-53
[5]  
Baillargeon R., 1992, EARLY DEV PARENTING, V1, P69, DOI [DOI 10.1002/EDP.2430010203, 10.1002/edp.2430010203]
[6]  
Baillargeon R., 1995, Advances in infancy research, P305
[7]  
Baillargeon Renee, 1995, P181
[8]   Innate Ideas Revisited For a Principle of Persistence in Infants' Physical Reasoning [J].
Baillargeon, Renee .
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2008, 3 (01) :2-13
[9]   Thought Experiments as an Error Detection and Correction Tool [J].
Bascandziev, Igor .
COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 2024, 48 (01)
[10]   Partial mental simulation explains fallacies in physical reasoning [J].
Bass, Ilona ;
Smith, Kevin A. ;
Bonawitz, Elizabeth ;
Ullman, Tomer D. .
COGNITIVE NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 38 (7-8) :413-424