Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM III) self-report

被引：0
作者：
Ozdemir, Yelda Soluk [1 ]
Ceylan, Cansin Medin [1 ]
Paker, Nurdan [1 ]
Korkut, Veysel [1 ]
Kutuk, Burak [1 ]
Ones, Kadriye [1 ]
Bugdayci, Derya [1 ]
Kesiktas, Fatma N. [1 ]
机构：
[1] Istanbul Phys Med & Rehabil Training & Res Hosp, Phys Med & Rehabil, Istanbul, Turkiye
来源：
SPINAL CORD | 2025年
关键词：
VALIDATION; INJURY; MULTICENTER; ADAPTATION;
D O I：
10.1038/s41393-025-01069-x
中图分类号：
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号：
摘要：
Study DesignA cross-sectional validation study.ObjectivesThe aim of the study was to create a Turkish version of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure Self-Report (SCIM-SR) scale and verify its validity and reliability.SettingRehabilitation Department at Istanbul Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation and Training Research Hospital.MethodsThe Turkish version of SCIM-SR was translated from English using forward and backward translation in accordance with standard guidelines and 90 participants completed the SCIM-SR Turkish form. At the same time, a Spinal Cord Independence Measure III (SCIM III) was administered to the participants by a health professional through observation. Cronbach's alpha, Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients were used to evaluate the internal consistency and concurrent validity.ResultsThe Cronbach's alpha coefficients for the total scale was 0.883. For the subscales, it was 0.929 for self-care, 0.571 for respiration and sphincter management and 0.885 for mobility. Test-retest reliability after two weeks yielded Spearman coefficients above 0.92 for the total scale and all subscales. When analyzing the correlation between SCIM-SR and SCIM III, the intraclass correlation average and its lower and upper bound values were as follows: 0.984 (0.976-0.990) for self-care; 0.970 (0.955-0.980) for respiration and sphincter management; 0.968 (0.951-0.979) for mobility and 0.980 (0.969-0.987) for the total. There was good agreement between SCIM-SR and SCIM III when evaluating the total score in Bland-Altman graphs. The Bland-Altman analysis revealed no significant proportional bias (0.76; 95% CI [-21.34, 22.87]), but a significant fixed bias was observed.ConclusionsThe Turkish version of SCIM-SR demonstrated excellent internal consistency and good validity in Turkish individuals with spinal cord injury.
引用
收藏
页码：222 / 226
页数：5
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Karatas G., Metli N., Yalcin E., Gunduz R., Karatas F., Akyuz M., The effects of the level of spinal cord injury on life satisfaction and disability, Ideggyogy Sz, 73, pp. 27-34, (2020)
  • [2] Officer A, Shakespeare T, von Groote P, World Health Organization. The 219 International Spinal Cord S, International Perspectives on Spinal Cord Injury, (2013)
  • [3] Aguilar-Rodriguez M., Pena-Paches L., Grao-Castellote C., Torralba-Collados F., Hervas-Marin D., Giner-Pascual M., Adaptation and validation of the Spanish self-report version of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM III), Spinal Cord, 53, pp. 451-454, (2015)
  • [4] Al Huthaifi F., Krzak J., Hanke T., Vogel L.C., Predictors of functional outcomes in adults with 225 traumatic spinal cord injury following inpatient rehabilitation: a systematic review, J Spinal Cord 226 Med, 40, pp. 282-294, (2017)
  • [5] Wang T., Tang J., Xie S., He X., Wang Y., Liu T., Et al., Translation and validation of the Chinese version of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM III) self-report, Spinal Cord, 59, pp. 1045-1052, (2021)
  • [6] Xing H., Liu N., Li K., Cui G., Biering-Sorensen F., Translation and validation of the Chinese self-report version of Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM-SR): Rasch psychometric analysis and online application, Comput Struct Biotechnol J, 24, pp. 258-263, (2024)
  • [7] Catz A., Itzkovich M., Agranov E., Ring H., Tamir A., SCIM–spinal cord independence measure: a new disability scale for patients with spinal cord lesions, Spinal Cord, 35, pp. 850-856, (1997)
  • [8] Catz A., Itzkovich M., Steinberg F., Philo O., Ring H., Ronen J., Et al., The Catz-Itzkovich SCIM: a revised version of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure, Disabil Rehabil, 23, pp. 263-268, (2001)
  • [9] Catz A., Itzkovich M., Rozenblum R., Elkayam K., Kfir A., Tesio L., Et al., A multi-center international study on the spinal cord independence measure, version IV: Rasch psychometric validation, J Spinal Cord Med, 47, pp. 681-691, (2024)
  • [10] Riberto M., Tavares D.A., Rimoli J.R.J., Castineira C.P., Dias R.V., Franzoi A.C., Et al., Validation 242 of the Brazilian version of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure III, Arq Neuropsiquiat, 72, pp. 439-444, (2014)
123