Participatory Management Can Help Artificial Intelligence Ethics Adhere to Social Consensus

被引:0
作者
Ozer, Mahmut [1 ]
Perc, Matjaz [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
Suna, Hayri Eren [7 ]
机构
[1] Natl Educ Culture Youth & Sports Commiss, Ankara, Turkiye
[2] Univ Maribor, Fac Nat Sci & Math, Maribor, Slovenia
[3] Complex Sci Hub Vienna, A-1080 Vienna, Austria
[4] China Med Univ, China Med Univ Hosp, Dept Med Res, Taichung 404, Taiwan
[5] Alma Mater Europaea, Slovenska Ul 17, Maribor 2000, Slovenia
[6] Kyung Hee Univ, Dept Phys, 26 Kyungheedae Ro, Seoul, South Korea
[7] Minist Educ, Paris Embassy Educ Off, Paris, France
来源
ISTANBUL UNIVERSITESI SOSYOLOJI DERGISI-ISTANBUL UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY | 2024年 / 44卷 / 01期
关键词
Artificial intelligence; ethics; bias; fairness; participatory algorithmic management; algorithmic accountability; BIG DATA; COMPUTER; BIAS; ALGORITHM; SOCIOLOGY; MACHINES; SOCIETY; DESIGN; HEALTH; TIME;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is rapidly becoming pervasive, reshaping social structures, cultural dynamics, and labor markets. This rapid growth has ignited global discussions surrounding AI's challenges, including its tendency to perpetuate biases and social inequalities, ignoring societal values, and affect diverse sectors such as genetics, drug production, defense, and democratic processes. This study examines AI ethics within the framework of social consensus, advocating for participatory management as a crucial approach to address these challenges. The proposed methodology includes the entire AI lifecycle, promoting inclusive practices from initial design through implementation, monitoring, and control. The participatory management model is structured in three phases: Stakeholder Engagement, which advocates for the active involvement of diverse stakeholders in the development of AI systems to ensure a range of perspectives in design, modeling, and implementation; Monitoring and Alignment, which emphasizes the continual observation of AI systems' interaction with their environments; and Macro Level Impact Analysis, which evaluates the broader societal impacts of the AI ecosystem across domains such as education, culture, health, and safety. This study underscores the importance of a collaborative, inclusive approach in AI development and management, emphasizing the need to align AI advancements with ethical principles and societal well-being.
引用
收藏
页码:221 / 238
页数:18
相关论文
共 110 条
  • [1] Acemoglu D., 2018, NBER Working Paper 24196
  • [2] Acemoglu D., 2023, CEPR Policy Insight, P1
  • [3] GROWTH AND UNEMPLOYMENT
    AGHION, P
    HOWITT, P
    [J]. REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1994, 61 (03) : 477 - 494
  • [4] Aghion P., 1990, NBER Working Paper 3223
  • [5] Explaining the discrepancy between intentions and actions: The case of hypothetical bias in contingent valuation
    Ajzen, I
    Brown, TC
    Carvajal, F
    [J]. PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 2004, 30 (09) : 1108 - 1121
  • [6] Algorithmic bias in data-driven innovation in the age of AI
    Akter, Shahriar
    McCarthy, Grace
    Sajib, Shahriar
    Michael, Katina
    Dwivedi, Yogesh K.
    D'Ambra, John
    Shen, K. N.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 2021, 60 (60)
  • [7] Aldewereld H., 2014, Handbook of ethics, values, and technological design
  • [8] Angwin J., 2016, Machine bias
  • [9] Aquino YS, 2023, AUST J GEN PRACT, V52, P439, DOI 10.31128/AJGP-12-22-6630
  • [10] Machine Learning as a Model for Cultural Learning: Teaching an Algorithm What it Means to be Fat
    Arseniev-Koehler, Alina
    Foster, Jacob G.
    [J]. SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS & RESEARCH, 2022, 51 (04) : 1484 - 1539