Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty Achieves Minimal Clinically Important Difference Faster Than Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty

被引:1
作者
Lim, Perry L. [1 ,2 ]
Kumar, Arun R. [1 ,2 ]
Melnic, Christopher M. [1 ,2 ]
Bedair, Hany S. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Med Sch, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Boston, MA USA
[2] Newton Wellesley Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Newton, MA USA
关键词
total knee arthroplasty; MCID; PROM; primary; revision; TOTAL JOINT ARTHROPLASTY; FINANCIAL BURDEN; OUTCOMES; PROMIS; HIP;
D O I
10.1016/j.arth.2024.08.038
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) remains underexplored regarding patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), particularly in terms of time to reach minimal clinically important difference (MCID). This study addresses this gap by comparing the time to achieve MCID between primary TKA (pTKA) and rTKA patients, providing valuable insights into their recovery trajectories. Methods: A total of 8,266 TKAs (7,618 pTKA and 648 rTKA) were retrospectively studied in a multi-institutional arthroplasty registry. Patients who completed the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) global physical, PROMIS physical function short form 10a (PF-10a), and knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score physical function short form (KOOS-PS) questionnaires were identified by Current Procedural Terminology codes. Survival curves with and without interval censoring were utilized to evaluate the time to achieve MCID. Results: Comparing the time to achieve MCID, rTKAs were significantly faster than pTKA for PROMIS global physical (3.5 versus 3.7 months, P = 0.004) and KOOS-PS (3.3 versus 4.2 months, P < 0.001), but similar for PROMIS PF-10a (4.4 versus 4.8 months, P = 0.057). Interval censoring also showed similar trends with earlier times to achieve MCID for rTKAs for PROMIS global physical (0.6 to 0.61 versus 0.97 to 0.97 months, P = 0.009) and KOOS-PS (0.97 to 0.97 versus 1.47 to 1.47 months, P < 0.001), but not for PROMIS PF-10a (2.43 to 2.54 versus 1.90 to 1.91 months, P = 0.92). Conclusions: The present study revealed that the time to achieve MCID was faster in patients undergoing rTKA compared to those undergoing pTKA. These findings allow surgeons to reassure preoperative rTKA patients that their recovery to a MCID postoperatively may be quicker than expected, especially when compared to their initial recovery after primary TKA. Level of Evidence: Level III. (c) 2024 Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:732 / 737
页数:6
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   icenReg: Regression Models for Interval Censored Data in R [J].
Anderson-Bergman, Clifford .
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE, 2017, 81 (12) :1-23
[2]   Trends in Revenue and Cost for Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty [J].
Ashkenazi, Itay ;
Christensen, Thomas ;
Ward, Spencer A. ;
Bosco, Joseph A. ;
Lajam, Claudette M. ;
Slover, James ;
Schwarzkopf, Ran .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2023, 38 (07) :S97-S102
[3]  
Beletsky Alexander, 2020, Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil, V2, pe723, DOI 10.1016/j.asmr.2020.06.002
[4]   Clinical and Economic Burden of Revision Knee Arthroplasty [J].
Bhandari, Mohit ;
Smith, Jon ;
Miller, Larry E. ;
Block, Jon E. .
CLINICAL MEDICINE INSIGHTS-ARTHRITIS AND MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2012, 5 :89-94
[5]   The logrank test [J].
Bland, JM ;
Altman, DG .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 328 (7447) :1073-1073
[6]  
Canfield Michael, 2020, Arthroplast Today, V6, P62, DOI 10.1016/j.artd.2019.10.003
[7]   The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005-2008 [J].
Cella, David ;
Riley, William ;
Stone, Arthur ;
Rothrock, Nan ;
Reeve, Bryce ;
Yount, Susan ;
Amtmann, Dagmar ;
Bode, Rita ;
Buysse, Daniel ;
Choi, Seung ;
Cook, Karon ;
DeVellis, Robert ;
DeWalt, Darren ;
Fries, James F. ;
Gershon, Richard ;
Hahn, Elizabeth A. ;
Lai, Jin-Shei ;
Pilkonis, Paul ;
Revicki, Dennis ;
Rose, Matthias ;
Weinfurt, Kevin ;
Hays, Ron .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2010, 63 (11) :1179-1194
[8]   The use of patient-reported outcome measures to guide referral for hip and knee arthroplasty PART 2: A COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS [J].
Dakin, H. ;
Eibich, P. ;
Beard, D. ;
Gray, A. ;
Price, A. .
BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2020, 102B (07) :950-958
[9]   The use of PROMs and shared decision-making in medical encounters with patients: An opportunity to deliver value-based health care to patients [J].
Damman, Olga C. ;
Jani, Anant ;
de Jong, Brigit A. ;
Becker, Annemarie ;
Metz, Margot J. ;
de Bruijne, Martine C. ;
Timmermans, Danielle R. ;
Cornel, Martina C. ;
Ubbink, Dirk T. ;
van der Steen, Marije ;
Gray, Muir ;
van El, Carla .
JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2020, 26 (02) :524-540
[10]   Have the Causes of Revision for Total and Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasties Changed During the Past Two Decades? [J].
Dyrhovden, Gro S. ;
Lygre, Stein Hakon L. ;
Badawy, Mona ;
Gothesen, Oystein ;
Furnes, Ove .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2017, 475 (07) :1874-1886