Evaluating R&D efficiency of China’s listed lithium battery enterprises

被引:0
|
作者
BAI Shizhen
BI Xinrui
HAN Chunjia
ZHOU Qijun
SHANG Wen-Long
YANG Mu
WANG Lin
IEROMONACHOU Petros
HE Hao
机构
[1] School of Management
[2] Harbin University of Commerce
[3] Harbin
[4] China
[5] Department of Management
[6] Birkbeck
[7] University of London
[8] London WCE HX
[9] UK
[10] Department of Systems Management and Strategy
[11] University of Greenwich
[12] London SE LS
[13] Beijing Key Laboratory of Traffic Engineering
[14] College of Metropolitan Transportation
[15] Beijing University of Technology
[16] Beijing
[17] School of Traffic and Transportation
[18] Beijing Jiaotong University
[19] Centre for Transport Studies
[20] Imperial College London
[21] London SW AZ
[22] School of Business Administration
[23] Chongqing Technology and Business University
[24] Chongqing
关键词
Data Envelopment Analysis; R&D investment efficiency; China’s listed lithium battery enterprises; technical efficiency; pure technical efficiency; scale efficiency;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F426.61 []; F832.51 [];
学科分类号
摘要
Promoting the growth of the lithium battery sector has been a critical aspect of China’s energy policy in terms of achieving carbon neutrality. However, despite significant support on research and development (R&D) investments that have resulted in increasing size, the sector seems to be falling behind in technological areas. To guide future policies and understand proper ways of promoting R&D efficiency, we looked into the lithium battery industry of China. Specifically, data envelopment analysis (DEA) was used as the primary approach based on evidence from 22 listed lithium battery enterprises. The performance of the five leading players was compared with that of the industry as a whole. Results revealed little indication of a meaningful improvement in R&D efficiency throughout our sample from 2010 to 2019. However, during this period, a significant increase in R&D expenditure was witnessed. This finding was supported, as the results showed that the average technical efficiency of the 22 enterprises was 0.442, whereas the average pure technical efficiency was at 0.503, thus suggesting that they were suffering from decreasing returns to scale (DRS). In contrast, the performance of the five leading players seemed superior because their average efficiency scores were higher than the industry’s average. Moreover, they were experiencing increasing scale efficiency (IRS). We draw on these findings to suggest to policymakers that supporting technologically intensive sectors should be more than simply increasing investment scale; rather, it should also encompass assisting businesses in developing efficient managerial processes for R&D.
引用
收藏
页码:473 / 485
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] China R&D
    不详
    R&D MAGAZINE, 2016, : 22 - 23
  • [42] Efficiency Evaluation of Listed Enterprises in China' s Biological Industry Based on DEA Model
    Ding Jun-Qi
    Bai Jing-Yu
    Lin Xiao-Feng
    PROGRESS IN BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOPHYSICS, 2022, 49 (02) : 431 - 437
  • [43] Research on the Technology Innovation Efficiency of China's Listed New Energy Vehicle Enterprises
    Chen, Songbo
    Feng, Yuqiang
    Lin, Chaoran
    Liao, Zhipeng
    Mei, Xiaoyao
    MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING, 2021, 2021
  • [44] Evaluating the research and development (R&D) efficiency of the Chinese construction industry
    Zhang, Bing
    Wang, Cui
    Ren, Xuan Ze
    ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION AND ARCHITECTURAL MANAGEMENT, 2024,
  • [45] Perspectives of automotive battery R&D in China, Germany, Japan, and the USA
    Bresser, Dominic
    Hosoi, Kei
    Howell, David
    Li, Hong
    Zeisel, Herbert
    Amine, Khalil
    Passerini, Stefano
    JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES, 2018, 382 : 176 - 178
  • [46] Study on the Correlation between R&D Investment and Performance of Chinese listed Companies on Growth Enterprises Market
    Guo Zhiyong
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2ND INTERNATIONAL FORUM ON STANDARDIZATION AND TRADE: CHINA FOCUS, 2010, : 158 - 162
  • [47] An Empirical Study of Board Education's Distribution and R&D Expenditure from Listed Manufacturing Firms in China
    He, Qiang
    Chen, Song
    Zhang, Jian
    PICMET 2010: TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT FOR GLOBAL ECONOMIC GROWTH, 2010,
  • [48] Privatization, Public R&D Policy, and Private R&D Investment in China's Agriculture
    Hu, Ruifa
    Liang, Qin
    Pray, Carl
    Huang, Jikun
    Jin, Yanhong
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2011, 36 (02) : 416 - 432
  • [49] Evaluation of technology innovation efficiency for the listed NEV enterprises in China
    Zhang, Tinglong
    Li, Sasa
    Li, Yifan
    Wang, Weizhong
    ECONOMIC ANALYSIS AND POLICY, 2023, 80 : 1445 - 1458
  • [50] The Study of Strategic Layout of Overseas R&D Investment by Listed Manufacturing Companies in China
    Liang, Lu
    Zhao, Xianjin
    2016 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ECONOMIC, BUSINESS MANAGEMENT AND EDUCATIONAL INNOVATION (EBMEI 2016), PT 1, 2016, 54 : 254 - 259