Real-time estimated Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score with intervals: improved risk monitoring with estimated uncertainty in health condition for patients in intensive care units

被引:0
作者
He, Yan [1 ]
Luo, Qian [2 ]
Wang, Hai [3 ]
Zheng, Zhichao [1 ]
Luo, Haidong [4 ]
Ooi, Oon Cheong [4 ]
机构
[1] Singapore Management Univ, Lee Kong Chian Sch Business, Singapore, Singapore
[2] Xian Jiaotong Liverpool Univ, Int Business Sch Suzhou, 8 Chongwen Rd, Suzhou 215123, Peoples R China
[3] Singapore Management Univ, Sch Comp & Informat Syst, Singapore, Singapore
[4] Natl Univ Singapore Hosp, Dept Cardiac Thorac & Vasc Surg, Singapore, Singapore
来源
HEALTH INFORMATION SCIENCE AND SYSTEMS | 2024年 / 13卷 / 01期
关键词
Risk monitoring; SOFA score; qSOFA score; 24-h mortality; Readmission rate; IN-HOSPITAL MORTALITY; NET RECLASSIFICATION; PROGNOSTIC ACCURACY; CRITICAL ILLNESS; SEPSIS; DISCRIMINATION; GUIDELINES; CRITERIA; BURDEN; TESTS;
D O I
10.1007/s13755-024-00331-5
中图分类号
R-058 [];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose Real-time risk monitoring is critical but challenging in intensive care units (ICUs) due to the lack of real-time updates for most clinical variables. Although real-time predictions have been integrated into various risk monitoring systems, existing systems do not address uncertainties in risk assessments. We developed a novel framework based on commonly used systems like the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score by incorporating uncertainties to improve the effectiveness of real-time risk monitoring. Methods This study included 5351 patients admitted to the Cardiothoracic ICU in the National University Hospital in Singapore. We developed machine learning models to predict long lead-time variables and computed real-time SOFA scores using predictions. We calculated intervals to capture uncertainties in risk assessments and validated the association of the estimated real-time scores and intervals with mortality and readmission. Results Our model outperforms SOFA score in predicting 24-h mortality: Nagelkerke's R-squared (0.224 vs. 0.185, p < 0.001) and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) (0.870 vs. 0.843, p < 0.001), and significantly outperforms quick SOFA (Nagelkerke's R-squared = 0.125, AUC = 0.778). Our model also performs better in predicting 30-day readmission. We confirmed a positive net reclassification improvement (NRI) of our model over the SOFA score (0.184, p < 0.001). Similarly, we enhanced two additional scoring systems. Conclusions Incorporating uncertainties improved existing scores in real-time monitoring, which could be used to trigger on-demand laboratory tests, potentially improving early detection, reducing unnecessary testing, and thereby lowering healthcare expenditures, mortality, and readmission rates in clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 43 条
[31]  
Steyerberg E.W., Pencina M.J., Lingsma H.F., Kattan M.W., Vickers A.J., Van Calster B., Assessing the incremental value of diagnostic and prognostic markers: a review and illustration, Eur J Clin Invest, 42, 2, pp. 216-228, (2012)
[32]  
Deeks J.J., Altman D.G., Diagnostic tests 4: likelihood ratios, BMJ, 329, 7458, pp. 168-169, (2004)
[33]  
Pencina M.J., D'Agostino R.B., Steyerberg E.W., Extensions of net reclassification improvement calculations to measure usefulness of new biomarkers, Stat Med, 30, 1, pp. 11-21, (2011)
[34]  
Leening M.J., Vedder M.M., Witteman J.C., Pencina M.J., Steyerberg E.W., Net reclassification improvement: Computation, interpretation, and controversies: a literature review and clinician’s guide, Ann Intern Med, 160, 2, pp. 122-131, (2014)
[35]  
Alba A.C., Agoritsas T., Walsh M., Hanna S., Iorio A., Devereaux P.J., McGinn T., Guyatt G., Discrimination and calibration of clinical prediction models: users’ guides to the medical literature, JAMA, 318, 14, pp. 1377-1384, (2017)
[36]  
Pencina M.J., D'Agostino R.B., Demler O.V., Novel metrics for evaluating improvement in discrimination: net reclassification and integrated discrimination improvement for normal variables and nested models, Stat Med, 31, 2, pp. 101-113, (2012)
[37]  
Desautels T., Das R., Calvert J., Trivedi M., Summers C., Wales D.J., Ercole A., Prediction of early unplanned intensive care unit readmission in a UK tertiary care hospital: a cross-sectional machine learning approach, BMJ Open, 7, 9, (2017)
[38]  
Vincent J.L., Moreno R., Clinical review: scoring systems in the critically ill, Crit Care, 14, pp. 1-9, (2010)
[39]  
Gultepe E., Green J.P., Nguyen H., Adams J., Albertson T., Tagkopoulos I., From vital signs to clinical outcomes for patients with sepsis: a machine learning basis for a clinical decision support system, J Am Med Inform Assoc, 21, 2, pp. 315-325, (2014)
[40]  
Liu G., Xu J., Wang C., Yu M., Yuan J., Tian F., Zhang G., A machine learning method for predicting the probability of MODS using only non-invasive parameters, Comput Methods Programs Biomed, 227, (2022)