Real-time estimated Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score with intervals: improved risk monitoring with estimated uncertainty in health condition for patients in intensive care units

被引:0
作者
He, Yan [1 ]
Luo, Qian [2 ]
Wang, Hai [3 ]
Zheng, Zhichao [1 ]
Luo, Haidong [4 ]
Ooi, Oon Cheong [4 ]
机构
[1] Singapore Management Univ, Lee Kong Chian Sch Business, Singapore, Singapore
[2] Xian Jiaotong Liverpool Univ, Int Business Sch Suzhou, 8 Chongwen Rd, Suzhou 215123, Peoples R China
[3] Singapore Management Univ, Sch Comp & Informat Syst, Singapore, Singapore
[4] Natl Univ Singapore Hosp, Dept Cardiac Thorac & Vasc Surg, Singapore, Singapore
来源
HEALTH INFORMATION SCIENCE AND SYSTEMS | 2024年 / 13卷 / 01期
关键词
Risk monitoring; SOFA score; qSOFA score; 24-h mortality; Readmission rate; IN-HOSPITAL MORTALITY; NET RECLASSIFICATION; PROGNOSTIC ACCURACY; CRITICAL ILLNESS; SEPSIS; DISCRIMINATION; GUIDELINES; CRITERIA; BURDEN; TESTS;
D O I
10.1007/s13755-024-00331-5
中图分类号
R-058 [];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose Real-time risk monitoring is critical but challenging in intensive care units (ICUs) due to the lack of real-time updates for most clinical variables. Although real-time predictions have been integrated into various risk monitoring systems, existing systems do not address uncertainties in risk assessments. We developed a novel framework based on commonly used systems like the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score by incorporating uncertainties to improve the effectiveness of real-time risk monitoring. Methods This study included 5351 patients admitted to the Cardiothoracic ICU in the National University Hospital in Singapore. We developed machine learning models to predict long lead-time variables and computed real-time SOFA scores using predictions. We calculated intervals to capture uncertainties in risk assessments and validated the association of the estimated real-time scores and intervals with mortality and readmission. Results Our model outperforms SOFA score in predicting 24-h mortality: Nagelkerke's R-squared (0.224 vs. 0.185, p < 0.001) and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) (0.870 vs. 0.843, p < 0.001), and significantly outperforms quick SOFA (Nagelkerke's R-squared = 0.125, AUC = 0.778). Our model also performs better in predicting 30-day readmission. We confirmed a positive net reclassification improvement (NRI) of our model over the SOFA score (0.184, p < 0.001). Similarly, we enhanced two additional scoring systems. Conclusions Incorporating uncertainties improved existing scores in real-time monitoring, which could be used to trigger on-demand laboratory tests, potentially improving early detection, reducing unnecessary testing, and thereby lowering healthcare expenditures, mortality, and readmission rates in clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
Rudd K.E., Kissoon N., Limmathurotsakul D., Bory S., Et al., The global burden of sepsis: barriers and potential solutions, Crit Care, 22, pp. 1-11, (2018)
[2]  
Vincent J.-L., Moreno R., Takala J., Et al., The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure, Intensive Care Med, 22, 7, pp. 707-710, (1996)
[3]  
Vincent J.-L., De Mendonca A., Cantraine F., Et al., Use of the SOFA score to assess the incidence of organ dysfunction/failure in intensive care units: results of a multicenter, prospective study, Crit Care Med, 26, 11, pp. 1793-1800, (1998)
[4]  
Ferreira F.L., Bota D.P., Bross A., Melot C., Vincent J.L., Serial evaluation of the SOFA score to predict outcome in critically ill patients, JAMA, 286, 14, pp. 1754-1758, (2001)
[5]  
Angus D.C., Linde-Zwirble W.T., Lidicker J., Clermont G., Carcillo J., Pinsky M.R., Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the United States: analysis of incidence, outcome, and associated costs of care, Crit Care Med, 29, 7, pp. 1303-1310, (2001)
[6]  
Liu V., Escobar G.J., Greene J.D., Et al., Hospital deaths in patients with sepsis from 2 independent cohorts, JAMA, 312, 1, pp. 90-92, (2014)
[7]  
Paoli C.J., Reynolds M.A., Sinha M., Gitlin M., Crouser E., Epidemiology and costs of sepsis in the United States—an analysis based on timing of diagnosis and severity level, Crit Care Med, 46, 12, pp. 1889-1897, (2018)
[8]  
Adhikari N.K., Fowler R.A., Bhagwanjee S., Rubenfeld G.D., Critical care and the global burden of critical illness in adults, Lancet, 376, 9749, pp. 1339-1346, (2010)
[9]  
Vincent J.L., Marshall J.C., Namendys-Silva S.A., Francois B., Martin-Loeches I., Lipman J., Reinhart K., Antonelli M., Pickkers P., Njimi H., Jimenez E., Assessment of the worldwide burden of critical illness: the intensive care over nations (ICON) audit, Lancet Respir Med, 2, 5, pp. 380-386, (2014)
[10]  
Holder A.L., Overton E., Lyu P., Kempker J.A., Nemati S., Razmi F., Martin G.S., Buchman T.G., Murphy D.J., Serial daily organ failure assessment beyond ICU day 5 does not independently add precision to ICU risk-of-death prediction, Crit Care Med, 45, 12, pp. 2014-2022, (2017)