Seven-year performance of a clinical metagenomic next-generation sequencing test for diagnosis of central nervous system infections

被引:6
|
作者
Benoit, Patrick [1 ]
Brazer, Noah [1 ]
de Lorenzi-Tognon, Mikael [1 ]
Kelly, Emily [1 ]
Servellita, Venice [1 ]
Oseguera, Miriam [1 ]
Nguyen, Jenny [1 ]
Tang, Jack [1 ]
Omura, Charles [1 ]
Streithorst, Jessica [1 ]
Hillberg, Melissa [1 ]
Ingebrigtsen, Danielle [1 ]
Zorn, Kelsey [2 ]
Wilson, Michael R. [3 ,4 ]
Blicharz, Tim [5 ]
Wong, Amy P. [5 ]
O'Donovan, Brian [5 ]
Murray, Brad [5 ]
Miller, Steve [1 ,5 ]
Chiu, Charles Y. [1 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Lab Med, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Biochem & Biophys, San Francisco, CA USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, Weill Inst Neurosci, San Francisco, CA USA
[4] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Neurol, San Francisco, CA USA
[5] Delve Bio, Boston, MA USA
[6] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Med, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[7] Chan Zuckerberg Biohub, San Francisco, CA 94158 USA
关键词
UNITED-STATES; MENINGITIS; VIRUS; ENCEPHALITIS; DELAY;
D O I
10.1038/s41591-024-03275-1
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is an agnostic method for broad-based diagnosis of central nervous system (CNS) infections. Here we analyzed the 7-year performance of clinical CSF mNGS testing of 4,828 samples from June 2016 to April 2023 performed by the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) clinical microbiology laboratory. Overall, mNGS testing detected 797 organisms from 697 (14.4%) of 4,828 samples, consisting of 363 (45.5%) DNA viruses, 211 (26.4%) RNA viruses, 132 (16.6%) bacteria, 68 (8.5%) fungi and 23 (2.9%) parasites. We also extracted clinical and laboratory metadata from a subset of the samples (n = 1,164) from 1,053 UCSF patients. Among the 220 infectious diagnoses in this subset, 48 (21.8%) were identified by mNGS alone. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of mNGS testing for CNS infections were 63.1%, 99.6% and 92.9%, respectively. mNGS testing exhibited higher sensitivity (63.1%) than indirect serologic testing (28.8%) and direct detection testing from both CSF (45.9%) and non-CSF (15.0%) samples (P < 0.001 for all three comparisons). When only considering diagnoses made by CSF direct detection testing, the sensitivity of mNGS testing increased to 86%. These results justify the routine use of diagnostic mNGS testing for hospitalized patients with suspected CNS infection.
引用
收藏
页码:3522 / 3533
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing Direct Diagnosis of Mixed Bacterial Meningitis in a Child: A Case Report
    Wang, Wei
    Wang, Yujuan
    Xin, Xiaowei
    Yin, Yi
    Zhao, Chun
    Jin, Youpeng
    INFECTION AND DRUG RESISTANCE, 2024, 17 : 4643 - 4648
  • [42] Next-generation sequencing in the diagnosis of viral encephalitis: sensitivity and clinical limitations
    Perlejewski, Karol
    Bukowska-Osko, Iwona
    Rydzanicz, Malgorzata
    Pawelczyk, Agnieszka
    Cortes, Kamila Caraballo
    Osuch, Sylwia
    Paciorek, Marcin
    Dzieciatkowski, Tomasz
    Radkowski, Marek
    Laskus, Tomasz
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
  • [43] The value of metagenomic next-generation sequencing for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculous using bronchoalveolar lavage fluid
    Gao, Jiali
    Zhao, Lu
    Chen, Gongqi
    Huang, Chunli
    Kong, Weiqiang
    Feng, Yuchen
    Zhen, Guohua
    LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2024, 55 (01) : 96 - 102
  • [44] Metagenomic next-generation sequencing for the clinical diagnosis and prognosis of acute respiratory distress syndrome caused by severe pneumonia: a retrospective study
    Zhang, Peng
    Chen, Yan
    Li, Shuyun
    Li, Chaoliang
    Zhang, Shuang
    Zheng, Weihao
    Chen, Yantang
    Ma, Jie
    Zhang, Xin
    Huang, Yanming
    Liu, Shengming
    PEERJ, 2020, 8
  • [45] Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing Reveals the Profile of Viral Infections in Kidney Transplant Recipients During the COVID-19 Pandemic
    Tian, Xiangyong
    Duan, Wenjing
    Zhang, Xiulei
    Wu, Xiaoqiang
    Zhang, Chan
    Wang, Zhiwei
    Cao, Guanghui
    Gu, Yue
    Shao, Fengmin
    Yan, Tianzhong
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 10
  • [46] Combining Metagenomic Sequencing With Whole Exome Sequencing to Optimize Clinical Strategies in Neonates With a Suspected Central Nervous System Infection
    Ge, Mengmeng
    Gan, Mingyu
    Yan, Kai
    Xiao, Feifan
    Yang, Lin
    Wu, Bingbing
    Xiao, Mili
    Ba, Yin
    Zhang, Rong
    Wang, Jin
    Cheng, Guoqiang
    Wang, Laishuan
    Cao, Yun
    Zhou, Wenhao
    Hu, Liyuan
    FRONTIERS IN CELLULAR AND INFECTION MICROBIOLOGY, 2021, 11
  • [47] Case Report: Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing for Diagnosis of Human Encephalitis and Endophthalmitis Caused by Pseudorabies Virus
    Yan, Weiqian
    Hu, Zhiping
    Zhang, Yingchi
    Wu, Xiaomei
    Zhang, Hainan
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2022, 8
  • [48] Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing in Diagnosis of a Case of Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonia in a Kidney Transplant Recipient and Literature Review
    Chen, Jie
    He, Ting
    Li, Xiujun
    Wang, Xue
    Peng, Li
    Ma, Liang
    INFECTION AND DRUG RESISTANCE, 2020, 13 : 2829 - 2836
  • [49] Diagnosis of Two Meningitis Cases Caused by Rickettsia Felis in China, with Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing: A Case Report
    Wang, Jie
    Zhou, Hong
    Dong, Zan
    Wang, Jing
    Wang, Rui
    Guan, Yuanlin
    INFECTION AND DRUG RESISTANCE, 2023, 16 : 7239 - 7245
  • [50] The Effectiveness of Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing in the Diagnosis of Prosthetic Joint Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Tan, Jun
    Liu, Yang
    Ehnert, Sabrina
    Nuessler, Andreas K.
    Yu, Yang
    Xu, Jianzhong
    Chen, Tao
    FRONTIERS IN CELLULAR AND INFECTION MICROBIOLOGY, 2022, 12