Seven-year performance of a clinical metagenomic next-generation sequencing test for diagnosis of central nervous system infections

被引:6
|
作者
Benoit, Patrick [1 ]
Brazer, Noah [1 ]
de Lorenzi-Tognon, Mikael [1 ]
Kelly, Emily [1 ]
Servellita, Venice [1 ]
Oseguera, Miriam [1 ]
Nguyen, Jenny [1 ]
Tang, Jack [1 ]
Omura, Charles [1 ]
Streithorst, Jessica [1 ]
Hillberg, Melissa [1 ]
Ingebrigtsen, Danielle [1 ]
Zorn, Kelsey [2 ]
Wilson, Michael R. [3 ,4 ]
Blicharz, Tim [5 ]
Wong, Amy P. [5 ]
O'Donovan, Brian [5 ]
Murray, Brad [5 ]
Miller, Steve [1 ,5 ]
Chiu, Charles Y. [1 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Lab Med, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Biochem & Biophys, San Francisco, CA USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, Weill Inst Neurosci, San Francisco, CA USA
[4] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Neurol, San Francisco, CA USA
[5] Delve Bio, Boston, MA USA
[6] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Med, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[7] Chan Zuckerberg Biohub, San Francisco, CA 94158 USA
关键词
UNITED-STATES; MENINGITIS; VIRUS; ENCEPHALITIS; DELAY;
D O I
10.1038/s41591-024-03275-1
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is an agnostic method for broad-based diagnosis of central nervous system (CNS) infections. Here we analyzed the 7-year performance of clinical CSF mNGS testing of 4,828 samples from June 2016 to April 2023 performed by the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) clinical microbiology laboratory. Overall, mNGS testing detected 797 organisms from 697 (14.4%) of 4,828 samples, consisting of 363 (45.5%) DNA viruses, 211 (26.4%) RNA viruses, 132 (16.6%) bacteria, 68 (8.5%) fungi and 23 (2.9%) parasites. We also extracted clinical and laboratory metadata from a subset of the samples (n = 1,164) from 1,053 UCSF patients. Among the 220 infectious diagnoses in this subset, 48 (21.8%) were identified by mNGS alone. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of mNGS testing for CNS infections were 63.1%, 99.6% and 92.9%, respectively. mNGS testing exhibited higher sensitivity (63.1%) than indirect serologic testing (28.8%) and direct detection testing from both CSF (45.9%) and non-CSF (15.0%) samples (P < 0.001 for all three comparisons). When only considering diagnoses made by CSF direct detection testing, the sensitivity of mNGS testing increased to 86%. These results justify the routine use of diagnostic mNGS testing for hospitalized patients with suspected CNS infection.
引用
收藏
页码:3522 / 3533
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Clinical Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing for Diagnosis of Central Nervous System Infections: Advances and Challenges
    Su, LingHui David
    Chiu, Charles Y.
    Gaston, David
    Hogan, Catherine A.
    Miller, Steve
    Simon, Dennis W.
    Thakur, Kiran T.
    Yang, Shangxin
    Piantadosi, Anne
    MOLECULAR DIAGNOSIS & THERAPY, 2024, 28 (05) : 513 - 523
  • [2] Next-generation Sequencing of Cerebrospinal Fluid for the Diagnosis of Unexplained Central Nervous System Infections
    Li, Zhen Yu
    Dang, Dan
    Wu, Hui
    PEDIATRIC NEUROLOGY, 2021, 115 : 10 - 20
  • [3] The added value of metagenomic next-generation sequencing in central nervous system infections: a systematic review of case reports
    Birkeland, Kira Waagner
    Mostert, Laurence
    Claas, Eric C. J.
    Aamot, Hege Vangstein
    Demuyser, Thomas
    INFECTION, 2025, : 831 - 849
  • [4] Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing for Pathogen Detection and Transcriptomic Analysis in Pediatric Central Nervous System Infections
    Ramchandar, Nanda
    Coufal, Nicole G.
    Warden, Anna S.
    Briggs, Benjamin
    Schwarz, Toni
    Stinnett, Rita
    Xie, Heng
    Schlaberg, Robert
    Foley, Jennifer
    Clarke, Christina
    Waldeman, Bryce
    Enriquez, Claudia
    Osborne, Stephanie
    Arrieta, Antonio
    Salyakina, Daria
    Janvier, Michelin
    Sendi, Prithvi
    Totapally, Balagangadhar R.
    Dimmock, David
    Farnaes, Lauge
    OPEN FORUM INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2021, 8 (06):
  • [5] Clinical application and evaluation of metagenomic next-generation sequencing in pathogen detection for suspected central nervous system infections
    Yuan, Lei
    Zhu, Xin Yu
    Lai, Lan Min
    Chen, Qiang
    Liu, Yang
    Zhao, Rui
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [6] The Current Status of Next-Generation Sequencing for Diagnosis of Central Nervous System Infections
    Wilson, Michael R.
    Tyler, Kenneth L.
    JAMA NEUROLOGY, 2022, 79 (11) : 1095 - 1096
  • [7] Clinical usefulness of metagenomic next-generation sequencing for the diagnosis of central nervous system infection in people living with HIV
    Chen, Jun
    Zhang, Renfang
    Liu, Li
    Qi, Tangkai
    Wang, Zhenyan
    Song, Wei
    Tang, Yang
    Sun, Jianjun
    Liu, Danping
    Lin, Yixiao
    Xu, Shuibao
    Yang, Junyang
    Shen, Yinzhong
    Lu, Hongzhou
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2021, 107 : 139 - 144
  • [8] Clinical application and evaluation of metagenomic next-generation sequencing in suspected adult central nervous system infection
    Zhang, Yi
    Cui, Peng
    Zhang, Hao-Cheng
    Wu, Hong-Long
    Ye, Ming-Zhi
    Zhu, Yi-Min
    Ai, Jing-Wen
    Zhang, Wen-Hong
    JOURNAL OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2020, 18 (01)
  • [9] A Seven-Year Evaluation of Viral Central Nervous System Infections
    Varici Balci, Fatma Kamer
    Sayiner, Ayca Arzu
    MIKROBIYOLOJI BULTENI, 2019, 53 (04): : 434 - 441
  • [10] Metagenomic next-generation sequencing of cell-free DNA for the identification of viruses causing central nervous system infections
    Lu, Yuying
    Zhang, Ye
    Lou, Zheng
    He, Xiaomin
    Zhang, Qinghua
    Zhang, Qingxia
    Zhao, Shu
    Chen, Han
    Zhu, Haixia
    Song, Zhi
    Zhang, Ruxu
    Ma, Caiyu
    Liu, Ding
    MICROBIOLOGY SPECTRUM, 2024, 12 (01):