Clinical Outcomes Between Completion and Abandonment of Radical Hysterectomy in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer Patients with Lymph Nodal Involvement Identified During Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

ObjectiveThis study aimed to summarize the clinical outcomes of early-stage cervical cancer patients with lymph node metastasis found during surgery who completed radical hysterectomy, or abandoned surgery and switched to chemoradiotherapy, in hopes of providing evidence for clinical treatment.MethodsThe PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP), and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched from inception to 20 November 2023. The analysis was conducted using STATA 16.0.ResultsA total of eight studies with 2105 early-stage cervical cancer patients were included in this review. Meta-analysis found no significant difference between the completing radical hysterectomy surgery (CRS) group and the abandoning radical surgery (ARS) group regarding overall survival (OS; hazard ratio [HR] 1.35, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.93-1.97; I2 = 27.2%, p = 0.221), progression-free survival (PFS; HR 0.39, 95% CI 0.14-1.07; I2 = 0.0%, p = 0.625) and disease-free survival (DFS; HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.13-2.84; I2 = 0.0%, p = 0.574). Meta-analysis found the total recurrence (risk ratio [RR] 0.49, 95% CI 0.30-0.79; I2 = 0.0%, p = 0.810) and pelvic recurrence (RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.17-0.91; I2 = 12.4%, p = 0.320) in the CRS group were less than those in the ARS group. Meta-analysis found that compared with the ARS group, the CRS group had fewer grade 3/4 adverse effects (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.41-0.82; I2 = 0.0%, p = 0.591).ConclusionsCurrent evidence suggests that for early-stage cervical cancer patients with positive lymph nodes detected during surgery, CRS and ARS have similar survival outcomes, but completing radical surgery results in a lower incidence of pelvic recurrence.Protocol RegistrationCRD42023480118.