The effect of response inhibition on the aftereffects of completed prospective memory

被引:0
|
作者
Gan, Jiaqun [1 ]
Guo, Yunfei [1 ]
Wang, Enguo [1 ]
机构
[1] Henan Univ, Henan Prov Key Lab Psychol & Behav, Kaifeng, Peoples R China
来源
PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH-PSYCHOLOGISCHE FORSCHUNG | 2025年 / 89卷 / 02期
关键词
SPONTANEOUS RETRIEVAL; COMMISSION ERRORS; DEACTIVATION; REMEMBER;
D O I
10.1007/s00426-025-02088-2
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The aftereffects of completed prospective memory (PM) refer to the phenomenon that, after PM task completion, it interferes with the subsequent task or results in the repetition of the previous intended behavior. Inhibition processing and monitoring processing are two important theoretical perspectives to explain the emergence of the aftereffects of PM. The present study aimed at exploring the processing mechanisms of PM aftereffects. In experiment 1, the response delay time was manipulated during the intention response to assess the role of response inhibition in the aftereffects of PM. In experiment 2, the convenience of response was manipulated by changing different response keys during task response phase, to further examine the effect of response inhibition. The results of Experiment 1 showed that the response speed of the ongoing tasks in the experimental group was slower than that in the control group under the non-delay condition. The results of Experiment 2 also showed that both convenient response group and inconvenient response group had slower response speed than control group. The results of Experiment 1 showed that more commission errors were generated under the delay condition. The results of the ongoing tasks indicate that PM aftereffects involve a controlled processing in both experiments. The results of commission errors in Experiment 1 indicate that the controlled processing involved in PM aftereffects is inhibition rather than monitoring, which supports the inhibition view.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Aging and strategic prospective memory monitoring
    Ball, B. Hunter
    Li, Y. Peeta
    Bugg, Julie M.
    MEMORY & COGNITION, 2020, 48 (03) : 370 - 389
  • [42] Prospective memory: Multiple retrieval processes
    Einstein, GO
    McDaniel, MA
    CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2005, 14 (06) : 286 - 290
  • [43] Varying the Complexity of the Prospective Memory Decision Process in an Air Traffic Control Simulation
    Loft, Shayne
    Pearcy, Ben
    Remington, Roger W.
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PSYCHOLOGIE-JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 219 (02): : 77 - 84
  • [44] How Does Performing Demanding Activities Influence Prospective Memory? A Systematic Review
    Matos, Patricia
    Pereira, Diana R.
    Albuquerque, Pedro B.
    Santos, Flavia H.
    ADVANCES IN COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 16 (03) : 268 - 290
  • [45] The role of cue salience in prospective memory commission errors in nonperformed nonfocal tasks
    Mello, Beatriz
    Matos, Patricia
    Albuquerque, Pedro B.
    COGNITIVE PROCESSING, 2024, 25 (03) : 395 - 402
  • [46] Prospective Memory in Adolescents with Autism: A Preliminary Study of the Impact of Memory Load
    Desaunay, Pierre
    Postel, Charlotte
    Bensaber, Farah
    Gonneaud, Julie
    Baleyte, Jean-Marc
    Anger, Marine
    Guenole, Fabian
    Malvy, Joelle
    Bonnet-Brilhault, Frederique
    Eustache, Francis
    Desgranges, Beatrice
    Guillery-Girard, Berengere
    DEVELOPMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 44 (08) : 543 - 553
  • [47] Prospective memory and working memory in comparison. New experimental paradigms
    Fronda, Giulia
    Monti, Cecilia
    Sozzi, Matteo
    Corbo, Massimo
    Balconi, Michela
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2020, 130 (08) : 834 - 840
  • [48] What Supports the Development of Children's Prospective Memory? Examining the Relation between Children's Prospective Memory, Memory Strategy Use, and Parent Scaffolding
    Mazachowsky, Tessa R.
    Hamilton, Colin
    Mahy, Caitlin E., V
    JOURNAL OF COGNITION AND DEVELOPMENT, 2021, 22 (05) : 721 - 743
  • [49] Characterising monitoring processes in event-based prospective memory: Evidence from pupillometry
    Moyes, Joseph
    Sari-Sarraf, Nadia
    Gilbert, Sam J.
    COGNITION, 2019, 184 : 83 - 95
  • [50] Strengthening encoding via implementation intention formation increases prospective memory commission errors
    Bugg, Julie M.
    Scullin, Michael K.
    McDaniel, Mark A.
    PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2013, 20 (03) : 522 - 527