The effect of response inhibition on the aftereffects of completed prospective memory

被引:0
|
作者
Gan, Jiaqun [1 ]
Guo, Yunfei [1 ]
Wang, Enguo [1 ]
机构
[1] Henan Univ, Henan Prov Key Lab Psychol & Behav, Kaifeng, Peoples R China
来源
PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH-PSYCHOLOGISCHE FORSCHUNG | 2025年 / 89卷 / 02期
关键词
SPONTANEOUS RETRIEVAL; COMMISSION ERRORS; DEACTIVATION; REMEMBER;
D O I
10.1007/s00426-025-02088-2
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The aftereffects of completed prospective memory (PM) refer to the phenomenon that, after PM task completion, it interferes with the subsequent task or results in the repetition of the previous intended behavior. Inhibition processing and monitoring processing are two important theoretical perspectives to explain the emergence of the aftereffects of PM. The present study aimed at exploring the processing mechanisms of PM aftereffects. In experiment 1, the response delay time was manipulated during the intention response to assess the role of response inhibition in the aftereffects of PM. In experiment 2, the convenience of response was manipulated by changing different response keys during task response phase, to further examine the effect of response inhibition. The results of Experiment 1 showed that the response speed of the ongoing tasks in the experimental group was slower than that in the control group under the non-delay condition. The results of Experiment 2 also showed that both convenient response group and inconvenient response group had slower response speed than control group. The results of Experiment 1 showed that more commission errors were generated under the delay condition. The results of the ongoing tasks indicate that PM aftereffects involve a controlled processing in both experiments. The results of commission errors in Experiment 1 indicate that the controlled processing involved in PM aftereffects is inhibition rather than monitoring, which supports the inhibition view.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Whoops, I Did It Again: Commission Errors in Prospective Memory
    Scullin, Michael K.
    Bugg, Julie M.
    McDaniel, Mark A.
    PSYCHOLOGY AND AGING, 2012, 27 (01) : 46 - 53
  • [32] Forming a new prospective memory intention can reduce prospective memory commission errors
    Guo, Yunfei
    Gan, Jiaqun
    Li, Yongxin
    HUMANITIES & SOCIAL SCIENCES COMMUNICATIONS, 2024, 11 (01):
  • [33] Memory Complaints and Prospective Memory Performance across the Lifespan
    Zoellig, Jacqueline
    Sutter, Christine
    Mattli, Florentina
    Eschen, Anne
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR NEUROPSYCHOLOGIE, 2011, 22 (01) : 33 - 45
  • [34] The effect and mechanisms of implementation intentions on prospective memory in individuals with and without schizotypal personality features
    Chen, Xing-jie
    Wang, Ya
    Liu, Lu-lu
    Shi, Hai-song
    Wang, Jing
    Cui, Ji-fang
    Shum, David H. K.
    Chan, Raymond C. K.
    MEMORY, 2014, 22 (04) : 349 - 359
  • [35] Target Context Specification Can Reduce Costs in Nonfocal Prospective Memory
    Lourenco, Joana S.
    White, Katherine
    Maylor, Elizabeth A.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2013, 39 (06) : 1757 - 1764
  • [36] Spontaneous retrieval reveals right-ear advantage in prospective memory
    Rothen, Nicolas
    Meier, Beat
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 71 (04) : 940 - 948
  • [37] Toward an Ecological Approach to Prospective Memory? The Impact of Neisser's Seminal Talk on Prospective Memory Research
    Meier, Beat
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 10
  • [38] Habitual Prospective Memory in HIV Disease
    Doyle, Katie L.
    Weber, Erica
    Morgan, Erin E.
    Loft, Shayne
    Cushman, Clint
    Villalobos, Javier
    Johnston, Elaine
    Woods, Steven Paul
    NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 29 (06) : 909 - 918
  • [39] Habitual prospective memory in preschool children
    Kelly, Andrew J.
    Camden, Abigail A.
    Williams, Melany C.
    Beran, Michael J.
    Perdue, Bonnie M.
    PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (10):
  • [40] Improving prospective memory with contextual cueing
    Bowden, Vanessa K.
    Smith, Rebekah E.
    Loft, Shayne
    MEMORY & COGNITION, 2021, 49 (04) : 692 - 711