Strategies and evaluation underpinning the implementation of suicide prevention training: a systematic review

被引:2
作者
Putri, Adelia Khrisna [1 ,2 ]
Mcgrath, Martina [1 ]
Batchelor, Rachel [3 ]
Ross, Victoria [4 ]
Krysinska, Karolina [1 ]
Hawgood, Jacinta [4 ]
Kolves, Kairi [4 ]
Reifels, Lennart [1 ]
Pirkis, Jane [1 ]
Andriessen, Karl [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Ctr Mental Hlth & Community Wellbeing, Melbourne Sch Populat & Global Hlth, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Univ Gadjah Mada, Fac Psychol, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
[3] Univ Oxford, Oxford Inst Clin Psychol Training & Res, Oxford, England
[4] Griffith Univ, Australian Inst Suicide Res & Prevent, Sch Appl Psychol, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
关键词
Suicide prevention training; Implementation; Evaluation; Systematic review; HEALTH; INTERVENTION; PERSPECTIVES; KNOWLEDGE; AWARENESS; FIDELITY; PROGRAM; SCIENCE;
D O I
10.1186/s12889-025-21999-8
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
BackgroundSuicide prevention training programs can enhance the capacity for suicide prevention by improving the attitudes and comprehension of individuals regarding suicide and increasing their skills in supporting a suicidal person. However, little is known about how training programs are implemented and how implementation is assessed. Thus, our review aims to identify the strategies and evaluation methods underpinning the implementation of suicide prevention training programs.MethodsThe systematic review adhered to the PRISMA guidelines and involved searches in MEDLINE, Embase, Emcare, PsycINFO, EBM Reviews, Scopus, and a forward and backward citation search following the full-text screening. Eligible studies (n = 28) reported the implementation strategy or implementation evaluation of a suicide prevention training program (PROSPERO #CRD42021288621).ResultsThe implementation strategies varied among three categories of training programs. Gatekeeper training predominantly utilized a train-the-trainer format and collaborations with stakeholders. Professional development training focused more on establishing supportive organizational infrastructure and extended post-training supervision. School-based curriculum training programs emphasized the distribution of educational materials and role-play activities. Surveys were the primary evaluation method, often complemented by interviews, observations, progress tracking, or focus groups. Evaluations primarily assessed acceptability, fidelity, and feasibility.ConclusionWhile certain training categories tend to employ specific strategies and evaluation measures more frequently than others, stakeholder collaboration, assessing content relevance, and follow-up supervision could be valuable across training programs. Tailored strategies may cater for groups with varying levels of knowledge and training in suicide prevention to enhance acceptability and feasibility. Future research should evaluate approaches that facilitate adoption and sustainability of suicide prevention training programs.
引用
收藏
页数:34
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Coroners' records on suicide mortality in Montreal: limitations and implications in suicide prevention strategies [J].
Houle, J. ;
Guillou-Ouellette, C. .
CHRONIC DISEASES AND INJURIES IN CANADA, 2014, 34 (01) :23-29
[42]   What is known about suicide prevention gatekeeper training and directions for future research [J].
Spafford, Sarah G. ;
Silverman, Morton M. ;
Gutierrez, Peter M. .
SUICIDE AND LIFE-THREATENING BEHAVIOR, 2025, 55 (01)
[43]   Preventing adolescent suicide: A systematic review of the effectiveness and change mechanisms of suicide prevention gatekeeping training programs for teachers and parents [J].
Torok, M. ;
Calear, A. L. ;
Smart, A. ;
Nicolopoulos, A. ;
Wong, Q. .
JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENCE, 2019, 73 :100-112
[44]   School-based gatekeeper training programmes in enhancing gatekeepers' cognitions and behaviours for adolescent suicide prevention: a systematic review [J].
Mo, Phoenix K. H. ;
Ko, Ting Ting ;
Xin, Mei Qi .
CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY AND MENTAL HEALTH, 2018, 12
[45]   Caring Contacts for Suicide Prevention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [J].
Skopp, Nancy A. ;
Smolenski, Derek J. ;
Bush, Nigel E. ;
Beech, Erin H. ;
Workman, Don E. ;
Edwards-Stewart, Amanda ;
Belsher, Bradley E. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SERVICES, 2023, 20 (01) :74-83
[46]   The impact of suicide prevention education programmes for nursing students: A systematic review [J].
Ferguson, Monika ;
Reis, Julie ;
Rabbetts, Lyn ;
McCracken, Tara ;
Loughhead, Mark ;
Rhodes, Kate ;
Wepa, Dianne ;
Procter, Nicholas .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH NURSING, 2020, 29 (05) :756-771
[47]   Effectiveness of suicide prevention interventions: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Hofstra, Emma ;
van Nieuwenhuizen, Chijs ;
Bakker, Marjan ;
Ozgul, Dilana ;
Elfeddali, Iman ;
de Jong, Sjakko J. ;
van der Feltz-Cornelis, Christina M. .
GENERAL HOSPITAL PSYCHIATRY, 2020, 63 :127-140
[48]   A Systematic Review of Evaluated Suicide Prevention Programs Targeting Indigenous Youth [J].
Harlow, Alyssa F. ;
Bohanna, India ;
Clough, Alan .
CRISIS-THE JOURNAL OF CRISIS INTERVENTION AND SUICIDE PREVENTION, 2014, 35 (05) :310-321
[49]   Evaluation of an online advanced suicide prevention training for pharmacists [J].
Pilbrow, Samantha ;
Staniland, Lexy ;
Uren, Hannah V. ;
Shand, Fiona ;
McGoldrick, Janey ;
Thorp, Emily ;
MacKrill, Monique ;
Moullin, Joanna C. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 2023, 45 (05) :1203-1211
[50]   Gatekeeper training for friends and family of individuals at risk of suicide: A systematic review [J].
Morton, Michael ;
Wang, Shijing ;
Tse, Kristen ;
Chung, Carolyn ;
Bergmans, Yvonne ;
Ceniti, Amanda ;
Flam, Shelley ;
Johannes, Robb ;
Schade, Kathryn ;
Terah, Flora ;
Rizvi, Sakina .
JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 49 (06) :1838-1871